–9–enabled them to be discharged over the parapet with a wide field of fire.Other guns were mounted to fire through embrasures in the east, northand west parapets, three to each side. The fort was entered by a bridgeover a dry moat and then through an octagonal Gothic guard tower.Similarly embellished towerletssprouted from the east and west extremitiesof the counterscarp. Amagazine capable of holding 350barrels of gunpowder was built intothe base of the tower and accommodationfor an officer and twelve menwas located in the upper part (Ellis,104).Most military observers regarded thefort as an ornamental and archaictoy. They were alarmed by the factthat its terreplein was only 22 feetabove high water, thus unnecessarilyexposing the gunners to enemy fire.They also objected to the towerwhich would become a source of flyingsplinters under bombardment. In1836 the newly-arrived commanding royal engineer, George Barney,reported that both Dawes Point battery and Fort Macquarie were‘totally inadequate to the defence of <strong>Sydney</strong> Cove’ (WO 55.852, f.75–77).The subsequent life of the fort attests to the comparative soundness ofits construction, but the process had been a painful one. At the timeGreenway had a massive task of designing and supervising a range ofpublic works in trying circumstances and each delay made his clientmore exigent. The artisan in charge of Fort Macquarie complained thatGreenway had never given him a proper <strong>plan</strong> to follow and tended tochange details while construction was underway (Kerr & Broadbent, 43).Greenway for his part became increasingly paranoid about the theft ofhis ideas and misuse of his <strong>plan</strong>s by others and increasingly proceededon a day-to-day ‘need to know’ basis (Havard, 168, quoting Bigge). It infuriatedhis builders. Despite the problems the fort was sufficientlycompleted to fire its first salute on the departure of Mr CommissionerBigge in February 1821.The arguments which occupied the next third of a century over thedefence of <strong>Sydney</strong> and its harbour had little impact on Fort Macquarieand it continued to be used for drills and saluting, although withoutregular professional gunners. It was not until the Crimean war that FortMacquarie was seriously reconsidered as a part of a defensive program.The imperial authorities had passed the title of the <strong>Sydney</strong> fortificationsover to the colonial administration in 1851 (Kerr, Fort Denison, 18) largelyto avoid the cost of long-overdue development. In 1856, however, thecolony had a new (more or less) responsible government with a treasuryswollen by the gold rushes, an active and pushful Barney incharge of harbour defence and a decisive royal engineer governorgeneral, William Denison (ibid, 19–20). Works at Fort Denison, MrsMacquarie’s Point, Kirribilli Point, Dawes Point and Fort Macquariewere undertaken (LA, V&P, 1856–57, Vol.III, EC minute 56–60).8. Fort Macquarie after theconstruction of the upperbattery, sea wall and es<strong>plan</strong>adein the early 1860s. Unknownphotographer about 1870.Private collection.For an account of harbour defencesin the period see J.S. Kerr, FortDenison, 16–21.
–10–In 1861 a five-gun (42-pounder?) battery was completed on the easternescarpment of Bennelong Point above and immediately adjacent toFort Macquarie (fig.8). The date is confirmed by the returns ofmounted and serviceable guns at the fort.31 Dec’r 42pr 24prcarronade12pr 6pr Notes1860 - 11 1 65 dismounted 42prbrought in1861 4 - - - -1862 5 4 1 - -(Statistical returns, NSW.)It was also at this time that an es<strong>plan</strong>ade was created round the fort byerecting an encircling sea wall and filling the area formerly covered byhigh tides (fig.8). Later in the 1860s the fort was upgraded by the additionof 32-pounder shot and 10-inch and 8-inch shell guns, probablyfor training purposes.In 1854 Fort Macquarie had become the drill ground of the colonialvolunteer artillery, formed hastily to repel the Russian bear (fig.9). Itwas also used by elements of 7 battalion, royal artillery, who hadarrived in October 1856 and had their headquarters at the Dawes Pointbattery, although much of theirstrength was despatched in 1858and 1861 to fight in the Maoriwars (Kerr, Fort Denison, 37). Late inthe century the fort was occupiedas a volunteer naval brigadedepôt and lecture rooms and adrill shed were erected south ofthe guard tower (fig.10). Thebrigade and its more portablebuildings were removed toRushcutters Bay in 1900–1901 tomake way for a tram depôt (PWD,AR, 1901).9. Drill of the ArtilleryVolunteers at Fort Macquarie,From the Illustrated <strong>Sydney</strong>News, 30.9.1854, p.264.Two other nineteenth centuryuses of the point are of interest.On 3 June 1858 the fort commencedfiring a noon-day gunon the drop of the time ball atthe new observatory. On 1 September it was altered to one o’clock andthereafter the government astronomer guaranteed that the timing wassufficiently accurate for the rating of ships’ chronometers (Gov t Gazette,1.6.1858 & 24.8.1858).Two years later a Milsons Point vehicular steam ferry was establishedfrom the west side of Bennelong Point near the dry moat (Stephenson &Kennedy, 137). The double-fronted vessel with a central smoke stack canbe seen in Halsted’s 1863 watercolour (fig.6). The ferry landing wasdemolished in 1889, presumably to make way for the completion ofmajor longshore wool, mail and passenger wharves which, during the
- Page 7: (vi)
- Page 10 and 11: -3-Early defence works and visitors
- Page 13 and 14: -6-5. Detail from a Charles Bayliss
- Page 15: -8-domain’ denies ‘facilities f
- Page 19 and 20: 12. Site boundary for aproposed Nat
- Page 23 and 24: -16-held, as an article of faith, t
- Page 25 and 26: -18-form of the corridors were dete
- Page 27 and 28: -20-In addition to this generally a
- Page 29 and 30: -22-to be a multi-purpose hall. To
- Page 31 and 32: -24-1. exterior and external works;
- Page 33 and 34: -26-The second was the long-overdue
- Page 35 and 36: -28-Redesign of catering facilities
- Page 37 and 38: -30and approving proposals for wo
- Page 39 and 40: -32-ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCEThe g
- Page 41 and 42: -34-Schedule of levels of significa
- Page 43 and 44: -36-• folded beams throughout the
- Page 45 and 46: -38-• Coburn’s Curtain of the S
- Page 47 and 48: -40-Awards for excellenceThe follow
- Page 49 and 50: -42-The area covered by this conser
- Page 51 and 52: -44-inadequate for present use. Thi
- Page 53 and 54: -46-where a ‘higher standard of f
- Page 55 and 56: -48-32. Unacceptable ‘temporary
- Page 57 and 58: -50-above. However, any determinati
- Page 59 and 60: -52-• colour, texture, reflectivi
- Page 61 and 62: -54-glass design and manufacture me
- Page 63 and 64: -56-planters and limited transparen
- Page 65 and 66: -58-Policy 18.3 of the 1993 conserv
- Page 67 and 68:
-60-seating, signs, drinking founta
- Page 69 and 70:
-62-Both approaches (via the exteri
- Page 71 and 72:
-64-the same angle as the existing
- Page 73 and 74:
-66-Policy 21.1 Any adaptation or d
- Page 75 and 76:
-68-Interior lighting policiesThe a
- Page 77 and 78:
-70-The seating in both Concert Hal
- Page 79 and 80:
-72-As it is now proposed to open t
- Page 81 and 82:
-74-SPACES ABOVE PODIUM LEVELSConce
- Page 83 and 84:
-76-scheme of the major hall (Utzon
- Page 85 and 86:
-78-Policy 31.1 The Reception Hall
- Page 87 and 88:
-80-Because of its height, volume,
- Page 89 and 90:
-82-60. Newly extended western foye
- Page 91 and 92:
-84-cost-effective, the least intru
- Page 93 and 94:
-86-relevant material (stone, ceram
- Page 95 and 96:
-88-and the early work was beset wi
- Page 97 and 98:
-90-Management and staff commitment
- Page 99 and 100:
-92-are now partly missing while ot
- Page 101 and 102:
-94-Policy 51.1 The more significan
- Page 103 and 104:
-96-The process should be given cer
- Page 105 and 106:
-98-• four eminent government and
- Page 107 and 108:
-100-• the actual periods in whic
- Page 109 and 110:
-104-Advertising, visual material,
- Page 111 and 112:
-106-James Semple KerrDr Jim Kerr h
- Page 113:
-102-Kerr, E.J., Designing a coloni