03.12.2012 Views

Review and Critical Analysis of International UHI Studies

Review and Critical Analysis of International UHI Studies

Review and Critical Analysis of International UHI Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

� Costs associated with the generation, collation <strong>and</strong> presentation <strong>of</strong> the information.<br />

5.5.4.3 Technological Barriers/Catalyst<br />

The five A’s are now examined to identify the barriers associated with the <strong>UHI</strong> technologies.<br />

Availability: this examines the status, existence <strong>and</strong> level <strong>of</strong> maturity <strong>of</strong> <strong>UHI</strong> technology<br />

including whether it has been fully tested <strong>and</strong> developed. This should also consider whether all<br />

the required materials <strong>and</strong> tools are available for the mass manufacture <strong>of</strong> the technology. The<br />

key technologies being discussed were: green ro<strong>of</strong>s, shade trees, cool ro<strong>of</strong>s <strong>and</strong> cool pavements.<br />

The literature indicates that all (apart from cool pavements) technologies had reached maturity<br />

<strong>and</strong> thus were readily available. Cool pavements, however, were demonstrated to still require<br />

further research <strong>and</strong> development to overcome technical issues highlighted in chapter 4.4.2.<br />

Awareness: this component examines the key stakeholders’ knowledge <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UHI</strong> technology,<br />

performance benefits <strong>and</strong> what issues may prevent them from becoming informed. For example<br />

the labeling <strong>of</strong> ro<strong>of</strong>ing materials <strong>and</strong> cool paints. The literature demonstrates that there is a<br />

general awareness <strong>of</strong> technology existence however, when the stakeholders make decisions it is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten difficult to know what <strong>UHI</strong> sensitive alternatives exist <strong>and</strong> clearer labeling was mentioned<br />

to help differentiate their relative benefits <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten justify the higher initial purchase cost over<br />

traditional alternatives.<br />

Accessibility: it is important that once stakeholders are aware <strong>of</strong> the key <strong>UHI</strong> technologies <strong>and</strong><br />

their existence that they have access to the source <strong>of</strong> suppliers <strong>of</strong> <strong>UHI</strong> mitigating technologies <strong>and</strong><br />

materials across the entire supply chain. For example, if a state intends to launch a mass retr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

<strong>of</strong> ro<strong>of</strong>s on public buildings it must have access the appropriate materials to undertake the task.<br />

The literature didn’t comment on any supply chain issues; however, in any mass scale up it is<br />

important that the materials <strong>and</strong> equipment used can be sourced locally to avoid supply chain<br />

bottlenecks.<br />

Affordability: the price <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UHI</strong> technology is a vital component for the mass uptake <strong>of</strong> <strong>UHI</strong><br />

technologies. The literature indicated the importance <strong>of</strong> examining the life‐cycle costs <strong>and</strong> in<br />

quantifying the benefits resulting from <strong>UHI</strong> technologies that would <strong>of</strong>ten help outweigh the<br />

high initial costs. The price component was indicated to be dependent upon the performance<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the <strong>UHI</strong> technology as well as if the technology was to be retr<strong>of</strong>itted or installed in new<br />

developments. Moreover, it was indicated that the residential sector would be more sensitive to<br />

the first cost element whereas the commercial sectors were more focused on long‐term issues<br />

such as life‐cycle costs <strong>and</strong> the payback periods. The cool ro<strong>of</strong> technology was indicated not to<br />

suffer from first cost issues due to similar prices to traditional technologies they sought to replace<br />

whereas cool pavements were demonstrated to be costly <strong>and</strong> life‐cycle benefits unproven.<br />

Acceptance: the acceptability <strong>of</strong> <strong>UHI</strong> technologies depends upon the balance <strong>of</strong> drawbacks <strong>and</strong><br />

benefits, the level <strong>of</strong> benefits attributed to the <strong>UHI</strong> technology, price <strong>and</strong> availability. The<br />

literature for cool ro<strong>of</strong>s reported that their competitive pricing, range <strong>of</strong> alternatives, <strong>and</strong> ease <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Review</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Critical</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>UHI</strong> <strong>Studies</strong><br />

Page 103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!