13.07.2015 Views

Money and Markets: Essays in Honor of Leland B. Yeager

Money and Markets: Essays in Honor of Leland B. Yeager

Money and Markets: Essays in Honor of Leland B. Yeager

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8 Lel<strong>and</strong>’s favorite economists *Jürgen G. BackhausIn a private conversation, when I <strong>in</strong>vited Lel<strong>and</strong> to come to Maastricht <strong>and</strong> give alecture on Walter Eucken on the occasion <strong>of</strong> his 100th birthday, Lel<strong>and</strong> agreedimmediately because, as he said, Walter Eucken was his favorite economist. 1Although Walter Eucken (1891–1950) kept a strong <strong>in</strong>fluence on post-World WarII German economics literature, this <strong>in</strong>fluence was tongue-tied <strong>and</strong> almost exclusivelyrestricted to the German language area, <strong>in</strong> both scholarship <strong>and</strong> policy application.This is despite the fact that some <strong>of</strong> his work has been available <strong>in</strong> English(Eucken 1950, 1951). Ten years ago, however, a first book-length appreciation<strong>of</strong> Eucken’s work appeared <strong>in</strong> English as a special issue <strong>of</strong> the Journal <strong>of</strong> EconomicStudies <strong>and</strong>, 50 years after his death, at least three books <strong>in</strong> German have appeared<strong>in</strong> appreciation <strong>of</strong> Walter Eucken’s work.This essay essentially makes three contributions. First, the recent literature onWalter Eucken is briefly reviewed. Second, Eucken’s constitutive pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong>market economy, a central focus <strong>of</strong> his work, are discussed from the po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong>their philosophical orig<strong>in</strong>. Third, the issue <strong>of</strong> hedonic price <strong>in</strong>dices is discussedfrom the po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g price-stability, Eucken’s central concern.In this sense, I try to respond to some <strong>of</strong> Lel<strong>and</strong>’s most fundamental concerns <strong>in</strong>scholarship. These are the orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> concepts <strong>in</strong> economics <strong>and</strong> theprecision <strong>of</strong> language. Hence, section II emphasizes the orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g, whilesection III focuses on the precision with which economic phenomena are to beexpressed.I Recent appreciation <strong>of</strong> Eucken’s workThe first <strong>of</strong> the four publications reviewed here appeared <strong>in</strong> 1994 <strong>in</strong> the Journal <strong>of</strong>Economic Studies (21:4) under the guest-editorship <strong>of</strong> Gerrit Meijer. The title <strong>of</strong> thisvolume is appropriately: The Intellectual Roots <strong>of</strong> Market Economies: Walter Eucken’sContribution to Economics. This volume has six essays <strong>in</strong> addition to the guest editor’s<strong>in</strong>troduction focus<strong>in</strong>g on the <strong>in</strong>tellectual roots <strong>of</strong> the market economy notable <strong>in</strong>Walter Eucken’s work. He<strong>in</strong>z Grossekettler has an extremely thorough article “OnDesign<strong>in</strong>g an Institutional Infrastructure for Economies: The Freiburg LegacyAfter 50 Years.” S<strong>in</strong>ce the article was presented at a conference <strong>in</strong> Maastricht <strong>in</strong>1991, it could still have had an <strong>in</strong>fluence on theory construction with respect to all

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!