13.07.2015 Views

Money and Markets: Essays in Honor of Leland B. Yeager

Money and Markets: Essays in Honor of Leland B. Yeager

Money and Markets: Essays in Honor of Leland B. Yeager

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

104 Jürgen G. Backhauscareful review <strong>of</strong> the sources. For the purpose at h<strong>and</strong>, however, I focus on whereEucken derived his notion <strong>of</strong> an order <strong>in</strong> economic life.In pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, one could th<strong>in</strong>k that Eucken followed Max Weber <strong>and</strong> postulatedan ideal type <strong>of</strong> an economic order. However, as Goldschmidt po<strong>in</strong>ts out, he was atpa<strong>in</strong>s to distance himself from Weber, whose ideal type he considered a Utopia(p. 51). Rather, as Goldschmidt emphasizes <strong>in</strong> Chapter 4, Eucken sought scholarlyunderst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g through (religious) belief (p. 121). In this, he explicitly refers back tohis father Rudolf Eucken. 5 The economic order Eucken sought had to be, at thesame time, an order <strong>in</strong> which one could lead one’s life accord<strong>in</strong>g to ethical pr<strong>in</strong>ciples<strong>and</strong> deeply rooted <strong>in</strong> Christian (Lutheran) belief (p. 121). The Ordo-pr<strong>in</strong>ciples hefound can be represented <strong>in</strong> what looks like a wheel <strong>of</strong> the basic pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> marketeconomy (p. 133). I herewith reproduce an English adaptation <strong>of</strong> the wheel (seeFigure 8.2).The follow<strong>in</strong>g section is devoted to a further discussion <strong>of</strong> the wheel <strong>and</strong> to anattempt to probe its <strong>in</strong>tellectual orig<strong>in</strong>s.It strikes me as surpris<strong>in</strong>g that the cornerstone <strong>of</strong> Ordo-liberalism should begrounded <strong>in</strong> Lutheran-protestant thought. Lel<strong>and</strong> himself, <strong>in</strong> an arcane footnote,refers to Friedrich Nietzsche but does not underp<strong>in</strong> my argument by what he writes(<strong>Yeager</strong> 2001: 229). Is it not really surpris<strong>in</strong>g that Lel<strong>and</strong>, the agnostic, shouldsubscribe to an economic theory ladled out <strong>of</strong> the founta<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> Christianity? Perhapswe are not too <strong>of</strong>f the mark. In logic we learn ex falso quod libet. From a false statementanyth<strong>in</strong>g can be deduced, even truth. We are not talk<strong>in</strong>g about explicitly falsestatements though; the problem is rather that we are confronted with the teach<strong>in</strong>gs<strong>of</strong> an economist who felt that his economic <strong>in</strong>sight had to parallel his religiousbeliefs. Can a Turkish immigrant to the European Union who opens a grocerystore <strong>in</strong> a metropolitan city conform to these pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, although he has never beentaught these protestant <strong>in</strong>sights? 6S<strong>in</strong>ce Eucken’s pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, which make em<strong>in</strong>ent economic sense, have no crediblefoundation <strong>in</strong> empiric evidence, 7 but s<strong>in</strong>ce, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, they make pla<strong>in</strong>Economicpolicy to ensurepropertyPrimacy <strong>of</strong> astable currencyRegulationaga<strong>in</strong>stanti-competitivebehaviorPredictability<strong>of</strong> economicpolicyLiabilityPrimary pr<strong>in</strong>ciple:functional price-basedcompetitionOpenmarketsPrivatepropertyReliableeconomicstatisticsFreedom<strong>of</strong> contractControl <strong>of</strong>monopoliesFigure 8.2 Eucken’s Wheel.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!