13.07.2015 Views

Money and Markets: Essays in Honor of Leland B. Yeager

Money and Markets: Essays in Honor of Leland B. Yeager

Money and Markets: Essays in Honor of Leland B. Yeager

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Reflections on reswitch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> roundaboutness 191sett<strong>in</strong>g the present value equal to zero would allow for the calculation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternalrate <strong>of</strong> return.With little or no ground<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> economics, the students could easily see that if apresent-value equation took the form <strong>of</strong> a polynomial <strong>of</strong> second-degree (or <strong>of</strong> somehigher degree), there was the dist<strong>in</strong>ct possibility <strong>of</strong> multiple <strong>in</strong>ternal rates <strong>of</strong> return.Further, it turns out that if a s<strong>in</strong>gle project whose break-even po<strong>in</strong>t (zero presentvalue) corresponds to more than one <strong>in</strong>terest rate, that project’s outlays <strong>and</strong> revenuescan be decomposed mathematically <strong>in</strong>to two outlay-<strong>and</strong>-revenue sequences torepresent two projects that exhibit the supposedly troublesome phenomenon <strong>of</strong>reswitch<strong>in</strong>g.The illustrative examples I <strong>of</strong>fer below differ from Samuelson’s <strong>in</strong> three respects.(1) I deal first with a s<strong>in</strong>gle project that entails multiple rates <strong>of</strong> return. (2) I workwith numbers that constitute plausible <strong>in</strong>terest rates: r = 2 percent <strong>and</strong> r = 8 percent.(Samuelson worked with 50 percent <strong>and</strong> 100 percent.) And (3) I start with themultiple rates <strong>and</strong> work backward to see what temporal characteristics the projectmust have. Then, hav<strong>in</strong>g identified a temporal sequence <strong>of</strong> revenues <strong>and</strong> outlays, Idecompose the sequence <strong>in</strong>to two projects that will exhibit switch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> reswitch<strong>in</strong>g,the switch po<strong>in</strong>ts occurr<strong>in</strong>g at those same two rates <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest, i.e., r = 2 percent<strong>and</strong> r = 8 percent.Multiple rates <strong>of</strong> returnIf a present-value reckon<strong>in</strong>g yields two solutions for the <strong>in</strong>ternal rate <strong>of</strong> return, say r= 2 percent <strong>and</strong> r = 8 percent, then that reckon<strong>in</strong>g must ultimately resolve itself <strong>in</strong>tothe equation(r – 0.02)(r – 0.08) = 0 (1)or r 2 – 0.10r + 0.0016 = 0 (2)Rewrit<strong>in</strong>g to express this equation <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> the discount factor (1 + r), we get[(1 + r) 2 – 2r – 1] – 0.10r + 0.0016 = 0 (3)(1 + r) 2 – 2.10r – 0.9984 = 0 (4)(1 + r) 2 – [2.10(1 + r) – 2.10] – 0.9984 = 0 (5)(1 + r) 2 – 2.10(1 + r) + 1.1016 = 0 (6)Divid<strong>in</strong>g by the highest power <strong>of</strong> the discount factor (1 + r) 2 puts the present-valueequation <strong>in</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard form:1 – 2.10/(1 + r) + 1.1016/(1 + r) 2 = 0 (7)F<strong>in</strong>ally, we can scale equation (7) by 100 so as to avoid fractions <strong>of</strong> pennies.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!