13.07.2015 Views

Note on this edition: this is an electronic version of the 1999 book ...

Note on this edition: this is an electronic version of the 1999 book ...

Note on this edition: this is an electronic version of the 1999 book ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Unravelling <strong>the</strong> Dem<strong>on</strong>ic Text 105“The Vascular System” (from <strong>the</strong> Encyclopédie; Bar<strong>the</strong>s 1974, endplate).to <strong>the</strong> point <strong>of</strong> fascinati<strong>on</strong> by <strong>the</strong> socialized body, <strong>the</strong> mythological body,<strong>the</strong> artificial body […].” 113 The textual movement that renounces <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong>unified subjectivity, c<strong>an</strong>, <strong>the</strong>refore, simult<strong>an</strong>eously signify a return to <strong>the</strong>plurality <strong>an</strong>d o<strong>the</strong>rness <strong>of</strong> body.The textual network as a site <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tradicti<strong>on</strong> <strong>an</strong>d dynamic identity c<strong>an</strong>already be located in <strong>the</strong> very first writings <strong>of</strong> Rol<strong>an</strong>d Bar<strong>the</strong>s. In h<strong>is</strong> firstpubl<strong>is</strong>hed article, “On Gide <strong>an</strong>d H<strong>is</strong> Journal” (1942), Bar<strong>the</strong>s pays attenti<strong>on</strong>to how André Gide’s journal c<strong>on</strong>s<strong>is</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> “details” without a single great org<strong>an</strong><strong>is</strong>ingprinciple – <strong>the</strong> “Journal <strong>is</strong> not <strong>an</strong> expl<strong>an</strong>atory, <strong>an</strong> external work; it <strong>is</strong>not a chr<strong>on</strong>icle (though actuality <strong>is</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten caught in its web [trame:weft]).” 114 Th<strong>is</strong> becomes a model for Bar<strong>the</strong>s’s critic<strong>is</strong>m <strong>of</strong> Gide, as well:Reluct<strong>an</strong>t to enclose Gide in a system I knew would never c<strong>on</strong>tent me, Iwas vainly trying to find some c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se notes. Finally Idecided it would be better to <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>the</strong>m as such – notes – <strong>an</strong>d not try tod<strong>is</strong>gu<strong>is</strong>e <strong>the</strong>ir lack <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tinuity. Incoherence seems to me preferable to ad<strong>is</strong>torting order. 115113Bar<strong>the</strong>s 1975/1977, 60-61.114 Bar<strong>the</strong>s 1983, 4.115Ibid., 3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!