13.07.2015 Views

Note on this edition: this is an electronic version of the 1999 book ...

Note on this edition: this is an electronic version of the 1999 book ...

Note on this edition: this is an electronic version of the 1999 book ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Technodem<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Digital Self 207evil. The dual<strong>is</strong>tic oppositi<strong>on</strong> (between ‘us’ <strong>an</strong>d ‘<strong>the</strong>m,’ or ‘good’ <strong>an</strong>d ‘evil’)<strong>is</strong> linked with <strong>the</strong> need to ra<strong>is</strong>e boundaries for identity; <strong>the</strong> questi<strong>on</strong>ing <strong>of</strong><strong>th<strong>is</strong></strong> boundary <strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong> problemat<strong>is</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> self/o<strong>the</strong>r div<strong>is</strong>i<strong>on</strong> <strong>is</strong> its necessarycounterpart. The dem<strong>on</strong>ic features in SF are interesting particularly because<strong>the</strong> rati<strong>on</strong>al emphas<strong>is</strong> associated with <strong>the</strong> genre leads <strong>on</strong>e to expect a differenttreatment <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rness <strong>an</strong>d selfhood in <strong>th<strong>is</strong></strong> “scientific” c<strong>on</strong>text. On acloser look, <strong>the</strong> univocally secular <strong>an</strong>d material<strong>is</strong>t label <strong>of</strong> SF starts to wearout. For example, in <strong>the</strong> popular novels <strong>of</strong> Arthur C. Clarke, <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>world’s best-known science ficti<strong>on</strong> writers, science <strong>an</strong>d technology pursue<strong>an</strong>swers to all hum<strong>an</strong>ity’s questi<strong>on</strong>s – reaching finally also those that havetraditi<strong>on</strong>ally bel<strong>on</strong>ged to religi<strong>on</strong>. In Childhood’s End (1953) <strong>the</strong> first alienshum<strong>an</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>fr<strong>on</strong>t are dem<strong>on</strong>ic in form, but much higher in <strong>the</strong>ir development<strong>of</strong> knowledge, morals <strong>an</strong>d technology. The diabolical appear<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>of</strong>aliens (<strong>the</strong>y are winged <strong>an</strong>d horned like medieval devils) <strong>is</strong> symbolically c<strong>on</strong>nectedwith <strong>the</strong>ir painfully tr<strong>an</strong>sgressive role in <strong>the</strong> evoluti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> our species;<strong>the</strong>y have come to lead hum<strong>an</strong>s into space, but <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>the</strong> children are capable<strong>of</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>ding to <strong>the</strong> call <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tr<strong>an</strong>scendent – <strong>the</strong> older generati<strong>on</strong> <strong>is</strong> boundto earth by <strong>the</strong>ir rigid structures <strong>of</strong> thought. 7 The tensi<strong>on</strong> between <strong>the</strong>young <strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong> old <strong>is</strong> articulated with <strong>the</strong> help <strong>of</strong> dem<strong>on</strong>ic imagery: <strong>the</strong> future<strong>is</strong> in league with <strong>the</strong> “scientific dem<strong>on</strong>s” (whereas <strong>the</strong> old are captives<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own superstitious fears). The evoluti<strong>on</strong>ary leap <strong>is</strong> a central motif inClarke; also 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968; directed by St<strong>an</strong>ley Kubrick,based <strong>on</strong> Clarke’s earlier short story) carries religious res<strong>on</strong><strong>an</strong>ce. The blackm<strong>on</strong>olith that m<strong>an</strong>ipulates <strong>the</strong> early hum<strong>an</strong>s into tool-users <strong>is</strong> a powerfulsymbol <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mythical force that technology exerc<strong>is</strong>es in SF. Th<strong>is</strong> story alsodepicts how m<strong>an</strong> c<strong>an</strong> leave h<strong>is</strong> earlier limitati<strong>on</strong>s by endorsing <strong>the</strong> dark <strong>an</strong>dfrightening powers <strong>of</strong> scientific evoluti<strong>on</strong>, technology, <strong>the</strong> unknown – movingtoward a new, god-like selfhood.Science ficti<strong>on</strong> <strong>is</strong> sensitive <strong>an</strong>d resp<strong>on</strong>sive to <strong>the</strong> prom<strong>is</strong>es <strong>of</strong> scientific<strong>an</strong>d technological progress. Study <strong>of</strong> its mythical subtext reveals that it alsoexpresses <strong>the</strong> <strong>an</strong>xieties inherent in <strong>th<strong>is</strong></strong> process. In a collecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> articles addressing<strong>the</strong> relati<strong>on</strong>ship between religi<strong>on</strong> <strong>an</strong>d SF (The Tr<strong>an</strong>scendent Adventure,1985) Robert Reilly <strong>of</strong>fers <strong>the</strong> explosi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first atomic bomb inHiroshima (1945) as <strong>the</strong> turning point in our relati<strong>on</strong>ship to technology.The deal with technology prom<strong>is</strong>ed free passage into scientific heaven; butafter <strong>th<strong>is</strong></strong> event, darker t<strong>on</strong>es gained increasing prominence. 8 In 2001 <strong>the</strong>ep<strong>is</strong>ode with Hal 9000, <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>-board computer, addresses <strong>the</strong> fears <strong>of</strong> toomuch intimacy between m<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>d machine – “artificial intelligence” <strong>is</strong>, after7 Childhood’s End has a special note attached to it: “The opini<strong>on</strong>s expressed in <strong>th<strong>is</strong></strong><strong>book</strong> are not those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> author.” In h<strong>is</strong> article “Immortal M<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>d Mortal Overlord:The Case for Intertextuality” Stephen Goldm<strong>an</strong> argues that <strong>the</strong> need to make <strong>th<strong>is</strong></strong> ambiguousd<strong>is</strong>m<strong>is</strong>sal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> novel (which opini<strong>on</strong>s? opini<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> characters? or <strong>the</strong> whole<strong>book</strong> if read as a statement?) must have been due to <strong>the</strong> heavy influence that <strong>the</strong> intertextc<strong>on</strong>cerning Sat<strong>an</strong> (especially Milt<strong>on</strong>’s Parad<strong>is</strong>e Lost) has <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> reader’s recepti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> it(Yoke - Hassler 1985, 193-208).8Reilly 1985, 4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!