13.07.2015 Views

Note on this edition: this is an electronic version of the 1999 book ...

Note on this edition: this is an electronic version of the 1999 book ...

Note on this edition: this is an electronic version of the 1999 book ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

182Dem<strong>on</strong>ic Texts <strong>an</strong>d Textual Dem<strong>on</strong>sfor example, that good <strong>an</strong>d evil are hum<strong>an</strong> creati<strong>on</strong>s; that “Sat<strong>an</strong>ic” <strong>is</strong> just <strong>an</strong>ame hum<strong>an</strong>s have given to such behaviour that d<strong>is</strong>rupts <strong>the</strong>ir c<strong>on</strong>cepti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>orderly ex<strong>is</strong>tence. 46 Nature itself <strong>is</strong> described as amoral, more pr<strong>on</strong>e to beesteemed by aes<strong>the</strong>tic criteria th<strong>an</strong> by ethical <strong>on</strong>es. The dem<strong>on</strong>ic elements in<strong>the</strong> series are c<strong>on</strong>nected to <strong>an</strong> ideological structure, which emphas<strong>is</strong>es <strong>the</strong>ex<strong>is</strong>tence <strong>of</strong> destructive <strong>an</strong>d chaotic potentials as parts <strong>of</strong> nature. The centralmetaphor <strong>is</strong> that <strong>of</strong> a “Savage Garden.”If “our c<strong>on</strong>versati<strong>on</strong>” [between Lestat <strong>an</strong>d h<strong>is</strong> mortal friend, Nicolas]could <strong>on</strong>ly c<strong>on</strong>tinue.Beauty wasn’t <strong>the</strong> treachery he imagined it to be, ra<strong>the</strong>r it was <strong>an</strong> unchartedl<strong>an</strong>d where <strong>on</strong>e could make a thous<strong>an</strong>d fatal errors, a wild <strong>an</strong>d indifferentparad<strong>is</strong>e without signposts <strong>of</strong> evil or good.In spite <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> refinements <strong>of</strong> civilizati<strong>on</strong> that c<strong>on</strong>spired to make art– <strong>the</strong> dizzying perfecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> string quartet or <strong>the</strong> sprawling gr<strong>an</strong>deur<strong>of</strong> Frag<strong>on</strong>ard’s c<strong>an</strong>vases – beauty was savage. It was as d<strong>an</strong>gerous <strong>an</strong>d lawlessas <strong>the</strong> earth had been e<strong>on</strong>s before m<strong>an</strong> had <strong>on</strong>e single coherentthought in h<strong>is</strong> head or wrote codes <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>duct <strong>on</strong> tablets <strong>of</strong> clay. Beautywas a Savage Garden. [...]Good <strong>an</strong>d evil, those are c<strong>on</strong>cepts m<strong>an</strong> has made. And m<strong>an</strong> <strong>is</strong> better,really, th<strong>an</strong> <strong>the</strong> Savage Garden. 47It <strong>is</strong> “<strong>on</strong>ly as <strong>an</strong> aes<strong>the</strong>tic phenomen<strong>on</strong> that ex<strong>is</strong>tence <strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong> world areeternally justified,” <strong>is</strong> <strong>the</strong> way that Nietzsche formulated <strong>th<strong>is</strong></strong> principle. 48Nietzsche’s The Birth <strong>of</strong> Tragedy <strong>is</strong> packed with dem<strong>on</strong>ic metaphors <strong>an</strong>d images,<strong>an</strong>d he <strong>is</strong> very useful in pointing out <strong>the</strong> paradoxes <strong>an</strong>d tensi<strong>on</strong>s thattypically motivate <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m. “Whatever ex<strong>is</strong>ts <strong>is</strong> both just <strong>an</strong>d unjust,<strong>an</strong>d equally justified in both,” was h<strong>is</strong> formulati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tragic c<strong>on</strong>flict. 49 Ihave above (in chapter two) read <strong>the</strong> ambiguity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nietzsche<strong>an</strong> positi<strong>on</strong>,<strong>the</strong> simult<strong>an</strong>eous accept<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>d recogniti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tradictory opposites. Inmorality, <strong>th<strong>is</strong></strong> amounts to <strong>the</strong> necessary recogniti<strong>on</strong> that value-systems arebased <strong>on</strong> hum<strong>an</strong> “myths,” <strong>an</strong>d (simult<strong>an</strong>eously) that such myths are essentialfor our ex<strong>is</strong>tence.The central problem in <strong>the</strong> Vampire Chr<strong>on</strong>icles <strong>is</strong> <strong>an</strong>alogous to <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>epresented by Nietzsche. Rice’s modern vampires like Lestat believe in <strong>the</strong>Savage Garden – a reality without <strong>an</strong>y inherent “me<strong>an</strong>ing” – but <strong>the</strong>y simult<strong>an</strong>eouslyare driven by <strong>the</strong>ir “desire for knowledge” to find some signific<strong>an</strong>tmyth. The endless dialectic <strong>of</strong> new questi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>swers creates a particularversi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Carroll’s “erotetic narrati<strong>on</strong>.” Even if morality <strong>is</strong> just a hum<strong>an</strong> in-46 VL, 334. – The view <strong>of</strong> morality as a c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> <strong>is</strong> linked with Nietzsche’s name;<strong>the</strong> view itself, however, has been comm<strong>on</strong> enough. In H. Rider Haggard’s She(1886/1926, 153) Ayesha p<strong>on</strong>ders: “My life has perch<strong>an</strong>ce been evil – I knew not, forwho c<strong>an</strong> say what <strong>is</strong> evil <strong>an</strong>d what good?” Earlier <strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> narrator had c<strong>on</strong>firmed that <strong>the</strong>morality was “<strong>an</strong> affair <strong>of</strong> latitude <strong>an</strong>d religi<strong>on</strong>, <strong>an</strong>d what <strong>is</strong> right in <strong>on</strong>e place, wr<strong>on</strong>g <strong>an</strong>dimproper in <strong>an</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r” (ibid., 87).47VL, 131.48 Nietzsche 1872/1967, 52 [§ V].49Nietzsche 1872/1990, 65 [§ IX].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!