13.07.2015 Views

Note on this edition: this is an electronic version of the 1999 book ...

Note on this edition: this is an electronic version of the 1999 book ...

Note on this edition: this is an electronic version of the 1999 book ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. The Dem<strong>on</strong>ic in <strong>the</strong> SelfBut <strong>an</strong>cient Violence l<strong>on</strong>gs to breed,new Violence comeswhen its fatal hour comes, <strong>the</strong> dem<strong>on</strong> comesto take her toll – no war, no force, no prayerc<strong>an</strong> hinder <strong>the</strong> midnight Fury stampedwith parent Fury moving through <strong>the</strong> house.– Aeschylus, Agamemn<strong>on</strong> 1Dem<strong>on</strong>s were chasing me, trying to eat me. They were grotesque, surreal,<strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong>y just kept pursuing me wherever I went. I was fighting <strong>the</strong>m withsome kind <strong>of</strong> sword, hacking <strong>the</strong>m to pieces. But each time I would cut<strong>on</strong>e into small pieces, <strong>an</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r would appear.– A dream <strong>of</strong> a patient;Stephen A. Diam<strong>on</strong>d, Anger, Madness, <strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong> Daim<strong>on</strong>ic 2THE SELFThe self <strong>is</strong> a problem. The l<strong>on</strong>g h<strong>is</strong>tory <strong>of</strong> educated d<strong>is</strong>cussi<strong>on</strong> about <strong>the</strong>hum<strong>an</strong> self has not succeeded in producing a c<strong>on</strong>sensus. Scholars working in<strong>the</strong> same d<strong>is</strong>cipline do not necessarily agree <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> fundamentals when debatinghow a hum<strong>an</strong> being should be understood. Th<strong>is</strong> <strong>is</strong> even truer as wecross d<strong>is</strong>ciplinary boundaries. Some think it <strong>is</strong> not necessary to presume <strong>the</strong>ex<strong>is</strong>tence <strong>of</strong> something like <strong>the</strong> “self,” o<strong>the</strong>rs c<strong>on</strong>sider it more fruitful to approachhum<strong>an</strong> ex<strong>is</strong>tence from different levels <strong>of</strong> observati<strong>on</strong> altoge<strong>the</strong>r. In<strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> literature <strong>an</strong>d literary studies, in psychology, as well as in o<strong>the</strong>rareas where individual experience <strong>is</strong> <strong>of</strong> paramount import<strong>an</strong>ce, <strong>the</strong> self never<strong>the</strong>lessc<strong>on</strong>tinues to ra<strong>is</strong>e interest. Even if <strong>the</strong>oretically d<strong>is</strong>puted as <strong>the</strong> authorialfigure, <strong>the</strong> self <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> autobiography, or <strong>the</strong> selves <strong>of</strong> some specificreaders, are explored as hermeneutic or phenomenological realities. The role<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> self appears no l<strong>on</strong>ger as <strong>the</strong> stable source or centre <strong>of</strong> me<strong>an</strong>ings, butas a complex c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> that <strong>is</strong> open to h<strong>is</strong>tory <strong>an</strong>d reinterpretati<strong>on</strong>. Th<strong>is</strong>ch<strong>an</strong>ge also makes dem<strong>on</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong> dem<strong>on</strong>ic in <strong>the</strong>ir relati<strong>on</strong>ship to self <strong>an</strong>interesting area for research <strong>an</strong>d re-evaluati<strong>on</strong>.The self <strong>is</strong> perhaps best understood as <strong>an</strong> element <strong>of</strong> figurative l<strong>an</strong>guage,a metaphor, as a way <strong>of</strong> interpreting, representing <strong>an</strong>d unifying somethingint<strong>an</strong>gible <strong>an</strong>d heterogeneous. The attitudes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Enlightenment arestill a str<strong>on</strong>g undercurrent in our culture, <strong>an</strong>d myths <strong>an</strong>d metaphors are tooeasily labelled no more th<strong>an</strong> lies or illusi<strong>on</strong>s to be debunked. George Lak<strong>of</strong>f<strong>an</strong>d Mark Johns<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g o<strong>the</strong>rs have studied how metaphors <strong>an</strong>d met<strong>on</strong>y-1 Aeschylus 1979, 131 (Agam. 755-60).2Diam<strong>on</strong>d 1996, 238.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!