13.07.2015 Views

Download the Tutorial

Download the Tutorial

Download the Tutorial

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.0.1 Intensity ValueHaving identified <strong>the</strong> risk elements, experts <strong>the</strong>n rank each element in relation to eacho<strong>the</strong>r and assign an intensity value in terms of degree of risk to <strong>the</strong> focal habitat/species.For example, certain types on mining, such as bauxite, may have more damaging effecton freshwater systems and thus assigned a higher intensity value, compared to limestoneexcavation which may have less damaging effect. Intensity values and influence distancesfor each risk element can be defined using information from existing literature and/orexpert opinion regarding <strong>the</strong> impacts of <strong>the</strong>se activities or features on ecosystems.Separate intensity values can be assigned relative to <strong>the</strong>ir impact on terrestrial, freshwateror marine biodiversity. The intensities should be normalized based on a relative scale(e.g. 0.0 – 1.0 or 0 - 100) so that <strong>the</strong>y are comparable across all risk elements and classes(i.e. different types of roads). The normalized intensity scores are not a representation of<strong>the</strong> absolute measure of <strong>the</strong> impact of activities on biodiversity. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>se normalizedvalues should be a relative degree to which biodiversity is more likely to survive in oneplace over ano<strong>the</strong>r based on <strong>the</strong> presence of a given activity in comparison to ano<strong>the</strong>ractivity. Examples of intensity values used in a conservation assessment for Jamaica canbe found in McPherson et al, 2008.1.0.2 Influence DistanceAfter <strong>the</strong> intensity values have been assigned, <strong>the</strong> next step is to determine <strong>the</strong> influencedistance of each risk element. The influence distance is <strong>the</strong> spatial extent or footprint of<strong>the</strong> activity and represents <strong>the</strong> maximum distance <strong>the</strong> feature has a negative impact on abiodiversity. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, as <strong>the</strong>distance of <strong>the</strong> buffer increases awayfrom <strong>the</strong> center (point, line orpolygon) where <strong>the</strong> activity is takingplace, <strong>the</strong> intensity values of <strong>the</strong> cellswithin <strong>the</strong> buffers diminishprogressively (distance decay) and<strong>the</strong> risk to <strong>the</strong> habitat is lessened.Some features may have high riskactivities that extend a long distancefrom <strong>the</strong> center, while o<strong>the</strong>rs have alower risk with more constrictedboundaries. It is best to set up a riskelement table that indicates <strong>the</strong>intensity and influence distance ofeach risk element. This will beexplained in more detail in <strong>the</strong> nextsection.1.0.3 Distance Decay TypesEcologists have documented that depending on <strong>the</strong> ecosystem, some risk elements mayhave a different impact than on o<strong>the</strong>r risk elements (Ervin and Parish 2006, TheobaldTNC Protected Area Tools (PAT) Version 3.0The Nature Conservancy, August 200912

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!