13.07.2015 Views

Download the Tutorial

Download the Tutorial

Download the Tutorial

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.0 The MARXAN AlgorithmOne of <strong>the</strong> more popular algorithms implemented in Marxan is <strong>the</strong> ‘simulated annealing’site optimization algorithm. In order to design an optimal reserve network, each planningunit is examined for <strong>the</strong> values it contains. The features within one planning unit may bevaluable alone but may not be <strong>the</strong> best choice overall—depending on <strong>the</strong> distribution andreplication of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r features in <strong>the</strong> wider planning area.During <strong>the</strong> simulated annealing procedure, an initial portfolio of planning units isselected. Planning units are <strong>the</strong>n added and removed in an attempt to improve <strong>the</strong>efficiency of <strong>the</strong> portfolio. Early in <strong>the</strong> procedure, changes in <strong>the</strong> portfolio that do notimprove efficiency can be made in order to allow <strong>the</strong> possibility of finding a moreefficient overall portfolio. The requirement to accept only those changes that improveefficiency becomes stricter as <strong>the</strong> algorithm progresses through a set of iterations. Notethat for any set of conservation targets and goals, <strong>the</strong>re may be many efficient andrepresentative portfolios that meet all conservation goals, but most of <strong>the</strong>se networkswould have a number of planning units in common. Many runs of <strong>the</strong> algorithm are usedto find <strong>the</strong> most efficient portfolio and to calculate a measure of irreplaceability (usedhere to indicate <strong>the</strong> number of times a particular unit is chosen). In some cases,conservation targets are only found in limited sites – areas of high irreplaceability that arealways chosen in any representative portfolio. Additionally, areas of high irreplaceabilityalso include planning units, whose exclusion would require a proportionally largerconservation area network to achieve <strong>the</strong> same level of representation, resulting in a lossof portfolio efficiency.The algorithm attempts to minimize portfoliototal ‘cost’ whilst meeting conservation goalsin a spatially compact network of sites. Thisset of objectives constitutes <strong>the</strong> ‘objective costfunction’ and is made up of three user-defined‘costs’:Total Cost = ∑Unit Cost + ∑SpeciesPenalties + ∑Boundary Lengthwhere ‘Total Cost’ is <strong>the</strong> objective (to beminimized), ‘Unit Cost’ is a cost assigned toeach planning unit, ‘Species Penalties’ arecosts imposed for failing to meet biodiversitytarget goals, and ‘Boundary Length’ is a costdetermined by <strong>the</strong> total outer boundary lengthof <strong>the</strong> portfolio.Attempts are made to minimize <strong>the</strong> totalportfolio cost by selecting <strong>the</strong> fewest planningunits with <strong>the</strong> lowest total unit cost needed toTNC Protected Area Tools (PAT) Version 3.0The Nature Conservancy, August 200943

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!