13.07.2015 Views

Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, 1983 - Bureau of Justice ...

Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, 1983 - Bureau of Justice ...

Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, 1983 - Bureau of Justice ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Criminal</strong> <strong>Justice</strong> SystemsCharacteristics <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Criminal</strong> <strong>Justice</strong> SystemsTable 1.73 State and Federal privacy statutes, by type <strong>of</strong> information regulated and jurisdiction, as <strong>of</strong> 1982Table 1.72 Statutory provisions for parole eligibilityMay 1981--CantinuedStateWyomingProvisions for parole eligibilitySpecialGeneralprovisionsAnytime withinthe discretion<strong>of</strong> the paroleboardand sentence reduction, by State, as <strong>of</strong>provisions for sentence reductionsGood timeDiscretionaryaccording toparole board--noautomaticstatutory goodtimeOtherN::lTE: This Information was compiled from a survey <strong>of</strong> State and Federallaws. All States have constitutionai provisions similar to the first andfourth arrendments to the U.S. Constitution. Although only a few havewritten into their State constitutions specific language protecting theri ght to privacy, many hove statutes protecting one or mare specificareas <strong>of</strong> privacy."Privacy statutes" refers to statutes or sections <strong>of</strong> a State'sconstitution indicating a general or specific right to privacy.''Privileged cOTTmunication" refers to information that is private because<strong>of</strong> a particular relationship (e.g., corrmunication between a person anda psychologist or clergyman). Because <strong>of</strong> the univel'sal nature <strong>of</strong>lawyer-client and husband-wife privilege, these statutes have not beenincluded in the section on privilege.Type <strong>of</strong> information regulated-II d Sh on Larson Judicial and Executive Discretion inSource: Caroline S. Caope.r, ~e~~a tKer:, el~n~nCodearProvisians '(Washington, D.C.: The kOerlcanthe Sentencing Process; AnaIXSI\~ dO ~ debY SQ...RCEBOOs-.:.:t:co '"YYYYYYYY(c)YYYy(c)(c)YYa>.~t,.,s­ a>::IU.EoUYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY h(a)y- (a,b)yY (a)YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY(a)V IY(a)(a)Y(a,b)YY(a)(a)Y(a)YYYYYYYyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYy'iYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyYYYbFair Information Practices A#s.Locoi ordinance within the State.CSignificant court decision affecting privacy.,~~rr.~~~~,r..;~:'=::~~~~~~~2.....!1~9!!.!.81(Washington, D.C.: Privacy Journal, 1981), p. 2; and data

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!