Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, 1983 - Bureau of Justice ...

-- -- --------------------------------------------------------~------------------.---------------------------------Characteristics of the Criminal Justice SystemsTable 1.66 Number, total funding, budgeted capacity, and utilization rate of drug abuse treatmentunits, by jurisdiction, on Sept. 3D, 1982NJTE: These data WE:re collected through the NationlllDrug and Alcoholism Treatment Utilization Survey{NDATUS}. Prior to 1979, the survey included onlythose facilities involved in the treatment of drugabuse; expansion of the survey to include olcoholismtreatment units reflects a Joint effort between theNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NI DA) and theNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism{NlMA}. Other agencies that cooperate in thesurvey are the Food and Drug Administration, theVeterans Administration, and each of the Stateagencies responsible for drug abuse and alcoholismprograms.A trea1ment unit is defined as a "facilityhaving (I) a formal structured arrangement for drugabuse treatment using drug-specified personnel, (2)a designated portion of the facility (or resources)for treatment services, ond (3) on allocated budgetfor such treatment services." Of the 3,018treatment units, 1,514 provided only drug abusetreatment services, ond 1,504 provided both drugabuse and alcoholism treatment."Budgeted capacity" is defined as the maximumnumber of clients a unit can treat. ''Utilizationrate" is the number of actual clients in treatmentdivided by the budgeted treatment capacity. "Totalfunding" includes all sources of funding for ali units.The funding data are not based on audits and shouldbe considered estimates.This information was provided by the Source.l.JurisdictionNumber ofdrug abusetreatmentunitsTotal Total Utilizationfunding {in budgeted rate (per 100thousands treatment budgetedof dollars)a c02acit~ capacity)Total 3,018$533,631 196,289 88.3Alabama 22Alaska 12Arkonsas 84Arizona 14California 282Colorado 32Connecti!:ut 65Delaware 8District of Columbia 21Florida 94Georgia 73Hawaii 7Idaho 9illinois 70Indiana 33Iowa 43Kansas 43Kentucky 106Louisiana 79Maine 16Maryland 78Massachusetts 78Michigan 106Minnesota 36Mississippi 47Missouri 21Montana 8Nebraska 18Nevada 24New Hampshire 17New Jersey 85New Mexico 29NE:w York 368North Carolina 35North DakOTa 10Ohio 125Oklahoma 22Oregon 27Pen~ylvania 115Rhode Island 13South Carolino 43South Dakota 14Tennessee 68Texas 131Utah 29Vermont 20Virginia 40Washington 52West Virginia 16Wisconsin 112Wyoming 9GJomIPuerto Rico 107Virgin IslandsI1,821 1,068 94.31,046 146 91.87,720 4,236 73.8825 596 61.169,046 24,331 8!i.95,353 1,952 97.012,799 3,158 94.2847 355 95.87,193 3,343 106.315,355 ~ 7,331 79.018,561 3,308 78.21,707 350 90.3300 238 51.314,784 5,599 87.24,313 1,309 77.23,423 795 50.24,623 1,360 63.83,338 1,575 65.37,161 4,833 85.0. 619 270 83.014,612 6,428 96.510,009 3,251 89.620,552 6,935 83.95,477 1,301 77.71,130 985 58.13,578 1,363 98.2708 283 101.81,552 648 90.31,590 783 91.81,895 370 83.218,028 8,252 91.84,226 1,859 89.0151,253 47,383 98.22,791 1,592 68.2357 300 94.020,804 8,103 85.81,501 521 71.82,514 1,130 93.824,595 7,480 100.52,188 896 94.92,583 1,266 94.9573 521 27.35,574 j ,742 68.417 ,997 8,568 84.82,572 '1,121 97.8851 356 79.28,802 2,918 90.56,695 2,491 90.0895 876 71.99,832 2,836 63.4634 494 63.457 30 53.36,237 7,044 79.7133 10 60.0'..,,' w.aDetaii may not add to total due to rounding.Source: Table adapted by saRCEBOa< staff from tables provided by U.S. Department of Health an·iH.nnan Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse.o\149