13.07.2015 Views

Guidelines for Complications of Cancer Treatment Vol VIII Part B

Guidelines for Complications of Cancer Treatment Vol VIII Part B

Guidelines for Complications of Cancer Treatment Vol VIII Part B

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9. Saline irrigation <strong>of</strong> the wound contributes to a 12% to56% reduction <strong>of</strong> the wound bacterial counts, andprevents tissue desiccation 4,25 . The addition <strong>of</strong> antibioticsto the irrigation solutions remains controversial 51,52 , butmay be reasonable during orthopedic procedures 4 . Mostcommonly used is a triple antibiotic solution <strong>of</strong>neomycin, polymyxin, and bacitracin, because itprovides the most complete coverage against commonmicroorganisms known to cause infection 51 . Morestudies are needed be<strong>for</strong>e routine implementation <strong>of</strong> thistechnique.10. There is insufficient evidence to support or refute theroutine use <strong>of</strong> closed surgical drainage in implantorthopedic surgery 53 . If used, drain removal should beaccomplished early to prevent retrograde contamination<strong>of</strong> the wound 25 .Antibiotic-impregnated bone cementThe use <strong>of</strong> antibiotic-impregnated cement <strong>for</strong> primary andrevision joint arthroplasty is becoming the standard <strong>of</strong> practicein Europe and Scandinavia 54 . It has been approved by the Foodand Drug Administration in the United States <strong>for</strong> use only ininfected joint arthroplasty. There are no established guidelines<strong>for</strong> use <strong>of</strong> these agents <strong>for</strong> prophylaxis in the United States 9 ,although the antibiotic-impregnated bone cements have beenextensively studied.1. A large prospective multicenter randomized Swedishstudy (1688 consecutive total hip arthroplasties) founda statistically significant difference at 5-year follow-upbetween deep infection rates in patients treated withsystemic antibiotics (1.9%) compared with patients whohad gentamicin-impregnated cement (0.8%). At 10-yearfollow-up the difference between the two groups (1.6%versus 1.1%) was not significant 55 .132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!