13.07.2015 Views

Guidelines for Complications of Cancer Treatment Vol VIII Part B

Guidelines for Complications of Cancer Treatment Vol VIII Part B

Guidelines for Complications of Cancer Treatment Vol VIII Part B

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Complications</strong> are mainly described according to the radiationportals (e.g focal con<strong>for</strong>mal RT, CSI and WBRT) or grade <strong>of</strong>the tumour (high and low grade). Grade and site <strong>of</strong> disease,age <strong>of</strong> presentation, radiation energy used (cobalt / Linearaccelerator) and also intensity <strong>of</strong> treatment regimen (fractionschedule, total RT dose) have an important role in thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> acute and late complications. Acute toxicitiesare defined as complications occurring within 2 months aftercomplications <strong>of</strong> treatment. Late complications usually occurafter 2-3 years, however may be observed even many yearsafter completion <strong>of</strong> treatment. The incidence and prevalence<strong>of</strong> toxicity also varies with the duration <strong>of</strong> follow up (e.gneuropsychological and neuroendocrine impairment has shownto increase with longer follow up). Few complications likeradiation induced CVA and radiation necrosis(pesudoprogression) have been described only in recentliteratures.In last few years there is a paradigm shift from earlier usedlarger conventional portals to current practice <strong>of</strong> imaging basedplanning and multiple smaller con<strong>for</strong>mal portals. Irradiatednormal tissue and thus complication pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> treatment haschanged in last few decades. The toxicity evaluation tools havealso evolved in recent years. Thus, it is imperative to interpretthe complication rate and severity with respect to the followup data, treatment schedules, toxicity evaluation tools usedand also patient demographic pr<strong>of</strong>ile.Evidences <strong>of</strong> CNS complications afterradiation therapyNeuropsychological functionNeurological function assessment is traditionally being doneby clinical examination, Karn<strong>of</strong>sky per<strong>for</strong>mance status (KPS)and neurological per<strong>for</strong>mance status (NPS). These are simpletests, require minimum expertise and are used to detect any345

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!