Histopathology of Seed-Borne Infections - Applied Research Center ...

Recommendations

Info

Seed Infection by Nematodes 243nnngbgABCgwngwbDcwEcwcapbbparparFGFIGURE 8.6 Comparison of galls containing nematode (A. agrostis) and bacterium R. rathayi(C. rathayi) in L. rigidum. A, Seed gall with wall cut longitudinally to show nematodes.B, Gall colonized by bacteria. C, D, Scanning electron micrographs showing parts of nematodegall, and enlarged part showing the regularly packed infective larvae, respectively. E, Nomarskidifferential interference contrast photograph of a section of a gall colonized by bacteria.F, TEM of a freeze-etched hydrated gall colonized by bacteria. G, A magnified bacteriumshowing bacterial capsule and adherent particles. (Abbreviations: b, bacteria; bg, gall containingbacteria; capb, capsule of bacterium; cw, cell wall; gw, gall wall; n, nematodes; ng,nematode gall; par, particle.) (From Bird, A.F., Stynes, B.A., and Thomason, W.W. 1980.Phytopathology 70: 1104–1109. With permission.)
244 Histopathology of Seed-Borne Infections8.5 CONCLUDING REMARKSCritical morphological and histological studies of nematode infections of seeds,wherever completed, have conclusively shown the path of penetration, the parts ofthe floret forming galls, location in the seed, and the conditions under which nematodesoccur in seed. There are several examples in which close association ofnematodes and seed tissues are known, e.g., D. dipsaci in lucerne, clover, onion,faba bean, and broad bean; D. africanus and P. brachyurus in groundnut; A. besseyiin rice; A. africanus in groundnut; A. ritzembosi and A. blastophorus in Callistephus;Heterodora in bean, pea, and sugarbeet; and Rhadinaphaenchus in coconut. Detailedinformation on the nematode association in the majority of these cases is lacking.Histopathological observations have revealed changes that nematodes undergoduring anhydrobiosis or quiescence, which enables them to survive unfavorableconditions. Information on location and period of survival of nematodes in seed isuseful for seed certification and quarantine, and for developing control strategies.REFERENCESAgarwal, K. 1984. Studies on Seed-Borne Mycoflora and Some Important Seed-Borne Diseasesin Wheat Cultivars Grown in Rajasthan. Ph.D. thesis, University of Rajasthan,Jaipur, India.Basson, S., De Waele, D., and Meyer, A.J. 1993. Survival of Ditylenchus destructor in soil,hulls and seeds of groundnut. Fundam. Appl. Nematol. 16: 79–85.Bird, A.F., Stynes, B.A., and Thomson, W.W. 1980. A comparison of nematode and bacteriacolonized galls induced by Anguina agrostis in Lolium rigidum. Phytopathology 70:1104–1109.Bos, W.S. 1977. Aphelenchoides arachidis n.sp. (Nematoda: Aphelenchoidea), an endoparasiteof the testa of groundnuts in Nigeria. Z. Pflanzenkr. Pflanzenschutz 84: 95–99.Bridge, J., Bos, W.S., Page, L.J., and McDonald, D. 1977. The biology and possible importanceof Aphalenchoides arachidis: a seed-borne endoparasitic nematode of groundnutsfrom northern Nigeria. Nematologica 23: 255–259.Byars, L.P. 1920. The nematode disease of wheat caused by Tylenchus tritici. Bull. U.S. Dept.Agric. 1042: 40.Caubel, G. 1983. Epidemiology and control of seed-borne nematodes. Seed Sci. Technol. 11:989–996.Corbett, D.C.M. 1976. Pratylenchus brachyurus. C.I.H. descriptions of plant-parasitic nematodes.Set 6, No. 89. CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.Courtney, W.D. and Howell, H.B. 1952. Investigation of the bent grass nematode, Anguinaagrostis (Steinbuch, 1799) Filipjev, 1936. Plant Dis. Rep. 36: 75–83.De Waele, D., Jones, B.L., Bolton, C., and Van den Berg, E. 1989. Ditylenchus destructor inhulls and seeds of peanut. J. Nematol. 21: 10–15.Dropkin, V.H. 1969. Cellular reponses of plants to nematode infections. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol.7: 101–122.Dropkin, V.H. 1977. Nematode parasites of plants, their ecology and the process of infection.In Encyclopaedia of Plant Physiology (New Series). Heitefuss, R. and Williams, P.H.,Eds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Vol. 4, pp. 222–242.Fenuwick, D.W. 1957. Red ring disease of coconuts in Trinidad and Tobago. Colonial OfficeReport, London, p. 55.
Page 2 and 3:
Histopathology ofSeed-Borne Infecti
Page 4:
PrefaceThe book deals with only one
Page 8 and 9:
The AuthorsDalbir Singh, Ph.D., for
Page 10 and 11:
ContentsChapter 1 Introduction ....
Page 12 and 13:
4.3.2 Routes for Infection from Ova
Page 14:
8.4 Survival in Seed ..............
Page 17 and 18:
2 Histopathology of Seed-Borne Infe
Page 19 and 20:
4 Histopathology of Seed-Borne Infe
Page 22 and 23:
2Reproductive Structuresand Seed Fo
Page 24 and 25:
Reproductive Structures and Seed Fo
Page 26:
Page 29 and 30:
14 Histopathology of Seed-Borne Inf
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
3Structure of SeedsThe seed habit i
Page 64 and 65:
Structure of Seeds 49(1971) of usin
Page 66 and 67:
Structure of Seeds 51is found in as
Page 68 and 69:
Structure of Seeds 53dry seed of Ly
Page 70 and 71:
Structure of Seeds 553.3.2 SEED COA
Page 72 and 73:
Structure of Seeds 57Endosperm: One
Page 74 and 75:
Structure of Seeds 59scendembepsmuA
Page 76 and 77:
Structure of Seeds 61Endosperm: Sca
Page 78 and 79:
Structure of Seeds 63Chalaza simple
Page 80 and 81:
Structure of Seeds 65stystypmerA Bc
Page 82 and 83:
Structure of Seeds 67epsent endCADB
Page 84 and 85:
Structure of Seeds 69perhscendembpe
Page 86 and 87:
Structure of Seeds 71eposgepi′epo
Page 88 and 89:
Structure of Seeds 73(Zea and Sorgh
Page 90 and 91:
Structure of Seeds 75Baker, D.M. an
Page 92 and 93:
Structure of Seeds 77Maheshwari Dev
Page 94:
Structure of Seeds 79Vries, M.A. de
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
100 Histopathology of Seed-Borne In
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
TABLE 5.6Location of Mycelium of St
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208: 192 Histopathology of Seed-Borne In
Page 214 and 215: 7Seed Infection by VirusesViruses a
Page 216 and 217: Seed Infection by Viruses 201TABLE
Page 220 and 221: Seed Infection by Viruses 205Unlike
Page 222 and 223: Seed Infection by Viruses 2073. The
Page 224 and 225: Seed Infection by Viruses 209Wilcox
Page 228 and 229: Seed Infection by Viruses 213floret
Page 230 and 231: Seed Infection by Viruses 215ptowvv
Page 232 and 233: Seed Infection by Viruses 2177.4.2
Page 234 and 235: Seed Infection by Viruses 219seed(s
Page 236 and 237: Seed Infection by Viruses 221AMV fo
Page 238 and 239: Seed Infection by Viruses 223REFERE
Page 240 and 241: Seed Infection by Viruses 225Hunter
Page 242: Seed Infection by Viruses 227Wolf,
Page 257: 242 Histopathology of Seed-Borne In
Page 297: 282 Histopathology of Seed-Borne In
show all

Histopathology of Seed-Borne Infections - Applied Research Center ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?