Histopathology of Seed-Borne Infections - Applied Research Center ...

Recommendations

Info

Physiogenic or Nonpathogenic Seed Disorders 253than 150 samples of pea seed from England, Hungary, the Netherlands, New Zealand,and the United States. and reported that hollow heart is a common disorder ofwrinkle-seeded peas. Singh (1974), who tested seeds from Argentina, Czechoslovakia,Denmark, India, Lesotho, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Romania, Scotland,Turkey, and the United States, also concluded that the wrinkle-seeded cultivars havea moderate to heavy incidence of hollow heart whereas the smooth-seeded cultivarsshow either no or a very low incidence. Perry and Howell (1965) also observed thatcultivar Alaska, a round-seeded pea, consistently had the least hollow heart.Jain and Singh (1985) examined 304 chickpea seed samples belonging to 297cultivars (254 cultivars desigram and 43 cultivars kabuligram) from India for hollowheart. A total of 156 cultivars (61%) of desigram and 37 cultivars (86%) of kabuligramshowed hollow heart incidence of 0.5 to 20% and 0.5 to 62%, respectively.The cavities on the adaxial surface of cotyledons were usually identical and rarelydissimilar or on one cotyledon only.Hollow heart in pea may be due to too quick drying of immature seed. Perryand Harrison (1973) experimentally showed that predisposition to hollow heart maybe caused by high ambient temperature during maturation of seeds on plants, andby drying them when immature. Hollow heart increased with increasing temperaturefrom 35 to 45°C and decreased as seed maturity advanced.Hollow heart has also been reported in Vicia faba and Phaseolus vulgaris (Perryand Howell, 1965) and Tropaeolum majus (Heit and Crosier, 1961).9.2.1.1.1 Hollow Heart and Shape and Size of SeedsGane and Biddle (1973) observed the relationship between shape of seed and incidenceof hollow heart in seed samples of cultivars Lincoln and Kelvedon Wonder.In the former, triangular seeds showed a higher incidence of hollow heart, whereasthis occurred in only two of the five samples of Kelvedon Wonder. Singh (1974)examined samples of four cultivars having seeds with three distinct shapes, namely,(1) squarish seeds with depression on two faces; (2) conical seeds with basal depression;and (3) irregular seeds. Squarish seeds formed the bulk in the samples. Nopositive correlation in the incidence of hollow heart and seed shape squarish, conicaland irregular was found.Seed samples of cultivar 4.12.01 7d Turkey had 44% large and heavy and 56%small and light seeds. The hollow heart incidence in small seeds was slightly higher(52%) than in the large seeds (42%) (Singh, 1974).9.2.1.1.2 HistologyThe histology of affected cotyledons has been examined in pea (Perry and Howell,1965; Singh, 1974) and chickpea (Jain, 1984). Anatomically, asymptomatic cotyledonsin wrinkle-seeded pea varieties consist of parenchyma cells as described undermarsh spot (Figure 9.3B). But the starch grains are compound (Figure 9.3B, C) andthe protoplasmic contents are evenly distributed in the cell.In symptomatic cotyledons, the anatomical symptoms are prominent in the cellsof mesophyll on the adaxial face, i.e., in the region of cavitation. The cells are loosewith large air spaces. The protoplasmic contents are poor and aggregated in thecenter as if plasmolyzed (Figure 9.3D, E). However, the cells on the abaxial face
254 Histopathology of Seed-Borne InfectionsABCDEFIGURE 9.3 Morphology and histology of normal and hollow-hearted cotyledons of peacultivar Dark Skin Perfection (Scotland). A, Cotyledon showing adaxial surface from watersoakedsplit seeds of hollow heart (right) and normal (left). B, C, Ts part of normal cotyledonfrom adaxial side. D, E, Ts from concavity in hollow-hearted cotyledons showing poor cellcontents. (From Singh, D. 1974. Seed Sci. Technol. 2: 443–456. With permission.)
Page 2 and 3:
Histopathology ofSeed-Borne Infecti
Page 4:
PrefaceThe book deals with only one
Page 8 and 9:
The AuthorsDalbir Singh, Ph.D., for
Page 10 and 11:
ContentsChapter 1 Introduction ....
Page 12 and 13:
4.3.2 Routes for Infection from Ova
Page 14:
8.4 Survival in Seed ..............
Page 17 and 18:
2 Histopathology of Seed-Borne Infe
Page 19 and 20:
4 Histopathology of Seed-Borne Infe
Page 22 and 23:
2Reproductive Structuresand Seed Fo
Page 24 and 25:
Reproductive Structures and Seed Fo
Page 26:
Page 29 and 30:
14 Histopathology of Seed-Borne Inf
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
3Structure of SeedsThe seed habit i
Page 64 and 65:
Structure of Seeds 49(1971) of usin
Page 66 and 67:
Structure of Seeds 51is found in as
Page 68 and 69:
Structure of Seeds 53dry seed of Ly
Page 70 and 71:
Structure of Seeds 553.3.2 SEED COA
Page 72 and 73:
Structure of Seeds 57Endosperm: One
Page 74 and 75:
Structure of Seeds 59scendembepsmuA
Page 76 and 77:
Structure of Seeds 61Endosperm: Sca
Page 78 and 79:
Structure of Seeds 63Chalaza simple
Page 80 and 81:
Structure of Seeds 65stystypmerA Bc
Page 82 and 83:
Structure of Seeds 67epsent endCADB
Page 84 and 85:
Structure of Seeds 69perhscendembpe
Page 86 and 87:
Structure of Seeds 71eposgepi′epo
Page 88 and 89:
Structure of Seeds 73(Zea and Sorgh
Page 90 and 91:
Structure of Seeds 75Baker, D.M. an
Page 92 and 93:
Structure of Seeds 77Maheshwari Dev
Page 94:
Structure of Seeds 79Vries, M.A. de
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
100 Histopathology of Seed-Borne In
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
TABLE 5.6Location of Mycelium of St
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 214 and 215:
7Seed Infection by VirusesViruses a
Page 216 and 217:
Seed Infection by Viruses 201TABLE
Page 218 and 219: Seed Infection by Viruses 203TABLE
Page 220 and 221: Seed Infection by Viruses 205Unlike
Page 222 and 223: Seed Infection by Viruses 2073. The
Page 224 and 225: Seed Infection by Viruses 209Wilcox
Page 226 and 227: Seed Infection by Viruses 211TABLE
Page 228 and 229: Seed Infection by Viruses 213floret
Page 230 and 231: Seed Infection by Viruses 215ptowvv
Page 232 and 233: Seed Infection by Viruses 2177.4.2
Page 234 and 235: Seed Infection by Viruses 219seed(s
Page 236 and 237: Seed Infection by Viruses 221AMV fo
Page 238 and 239: Seed Infection by Viruses 223REFERE
Page 240 and 241: Seed Infection by Viruses 225Hunter
Page 242: Seed Infection by Viruses 227Wolf,
Page 245 and 246: 230 Histopathology of Seed-Borne In
Page 267: 252 Histopathology of Seed-Borne In
Page 297: 282 Histopathology of Seed-Borne In
show all

Histopathology of Seed-Borne Infections - Applied Research Center ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?