Histopathology of Seed-Borne Infections - Applied Research Center ...

Recommendations

Info

Physiogenic or Nonpathogenic Seed Disorders 259Don, R., Bustamente, L., Rennie, W.J., and Seddon, M.G. 1984. Hollow heart of pea (Pisumsativum). Seed Sci. Technol. 12: 707–721.Eickstein, O., Bruno, A., and Turrentine, J.W. 1937. Kennzeichen des Kalimangels. ZweiteAuflage. Verlag Gesellschaft für Ackerbau, Berlin.Evans, L.S. 1984. Acidic precipitation effects on terrestrial vegetation. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol.22: 397–420.Finley, A.M. 1959. Drought spot of lettuce cotyledons. Plant Dis. Rep. 43: 629–632.Gane, A.J. and Biddle, A.J. 1973. Hollow heart of pea (Pisum sativum). Ann. Appl. Biol. 74:239–247.Gupta, M., Pandey, N., and Sharma, C.P. 1994. Zinc deficiency on seed coat topography ofVicia faba Linn. Phytomorphology 44: 135–138.Harris, H.C. and Gilman, R.L. 1957. Effect of boron on peanuts. Soil Sci. 84: 233–242.Heintze, S.G. 1938. Readily soluble manganese of soils and marsh spot of peas. J. Agric. Sci.Camb., 28: 175–186.Heintze, S.G. 1956. The effects of various soil treatments on the occurrence of marsh spotin pea and on manganese uptake and yield of oats and timothy. Plant Soil 7: 218–252.Heit, C.E. and Crosier, W.F. 1961. Nasturtium seed germination as affected by abnormal seeddevelopment. Proc. Assoc. Off. Seed Analysts N. Am. 51: 78–81.Harrison, J.G. and Perry, D.A. 1973. Effect of hollow heart on growth of peas. Ann. Appl.Biol. 73: 103–109.Hoffman, I.C. 1933. Potash starvation in the greenhouse. Better Crops with Plant Food 18: 10.Jacobson, J.S., and Hill, A.C. Eds. 1970. Recognition of Air Pollution Injury to Vegetation:A Pictorial Atlas. Air Pollution Control Association, Pittsburgh, PA.Jain, S.K. 1984. Physical, Physiological and Pathological Disorders of Chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.). Ph.D. thesis, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.Jain, S.K. and Singh, D. 1985. Hollow heart in chickpea seed. ICN 12: 30–31.Jamalainen, E.A. 1936. Herneen Siementen sisainen urmeltuminen. [Internal necrosis of peaseeds.] Valtion Maatalousk Julk. 79: 1–8.Jørgensen, J. 1967 . Nogle undersøgelser over årsagerne til grafarvningen of frø af gul sennep(Sinapsis alba). In Statsfrokontrollen Kobenhaven. Beretning for det 96. arbejdsarfra 1. juli 1966 til 30 juni. 1967: 78–97.Kietreiber, M. 1969. Abnormale Saprossentwicklung bei Bohnenkeimlingen. Jahrbuch 1968der Bundesanstalt für Planzenbau und Samenprufüng in Wien: 38–45.Lacasse, N.L. and Treshow, M., Eds. 1976. Diagnosing Vegetation Injury Caused by AirPollution. Applied Science Associates, Inc., Washington, D.C.Lacey, M.S. 1934. Studies in bacteriosis. XXI. An investigation of marsh spot of peas. Ann.Appl. Bbiol. 21: 621–640.Lawrence, J.A. and Weinstein, L.H. 1981. Effects of air pollutants on plant productivity. Ann.Rev. Phytopathol. 19: 257–271.Levitt, J. 1972. Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses. Academic Press, New York.Lohnis, M.P. 1936. Wat veroorgaakt kwade harten in erwten. Tijdschr. Plziekt. 42: 159–167.Mansholt, J.H. 1894. Antwoord op vraag in no. 4 van dit blad. [About a disorder in pea.]Nederlandsch Landbouw, Weekblad 7: 2–3.Mattusch, von P. 1973. Die Hohlberzigkeit, eine physiologische Störung von Samen derGemuseerbse (Pisum sativum L.) Nachrichtenbl. Dtsch. Pflanzenschutzdienst, Braunschweig35: 179–182.McCollum, J.P. 1953. Factors affecting cotyledonary cracking during the germination of beans(Phaseolus vulgaris). Plant Physiol. 28: 267–274.McMurtrey, J.E, Jr. 1953. Environmental nonparasitic injuries. Yearbook Agriculture, U.S.Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., pp. 94–100.
260 Histopathology of Seed-Borne InfectionsMoore, R.P. 1964. Garden pea cotyledon cavities. Newsl. Assoc. Off. Seed Analysts N. Am.38: 12–13.Myers, A. 1947. “Hollow heart”: an abnormal condition of the cotyledons of Pisum sativumL. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 13: 76.Myers, A. 1948. “Hollow heart”: an abnormal condition of the cotyledons of Pisum sativumL. Proc. Int. Seed Test Assoc. 14: 35–37.Neergaard, P. 1945. Danish Species of Alternaria and Stemphylium. Einar Munksgaard,Copenhagen.Neergaard, P. 1979. Seed Pathology. Vols. 1 and 2. Macmillan Press, London.Noble, M. 1960. Marsh spot and hollow heart in peas. Proc. Int. Seed Test Assoc. 25: 536–538.Pell, E.J. 1979. How air pollutants induce disease. In Plant Disease: An Advanced Treatise.Horsfall, J.G. and Cowling, E.B., Eds. Academic Press, New York. Vol. 4,pp. 273–292.Perry, D.A. 1967. Seed vigour and field establishments of peas. Proc. Int. Seed. Test. Assoc.32: 3–12.Perry, D.A. and Harrison, J.G. 1973. Causes and development of hollow heart in pea seed.Ann. Appl. Biol. 73: 95–101.Perry, D.A. and Howell, P.J. 1965. Symptoms and nature of hollow heart in pea seed. PlantPathol. 14: 111–116.Pethybridge, G.H. 1936. Marsh spot in pea seed: is it a deficiency disease? J. Min. Agric.Fish. 43: 55–58.Pirson, H. 1966. Über Trockenschäden an Bohnen und Erbsen. Saatgutwirtschaft 18: 240:242–243.Pollock, B.M., Roos, E.E., and Manalo, J.R. 1969. Vigor of garden bean seeds and seedlingsinfluenced by initial seed moisture, substrate oxygen and imbibition temperature.J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 94: 577–584.Rogers, C.B.W. 1953. Report of the subcommittee on the evaluation of lettuce seedlings.Proc. Assoc. Off. Seed Analysts N. Am. 43: 35.Scaife, A. and Turner, M. 1984. Diagnosis of Mineral Disorders in Plants. Vols. 1 and 2.Chemical Publishing, New York.Singh, D. 1974. Occurrence and histology of hollow heart and marsh spot in peas. Seed Sci.Technol. 2: 443–456.Singh, D. and Mathur, R. 1992. Comparative anatomy and ultrastructure of normal and marshspot affected cotyledons of pea. Phytomorphology 42: 145–150.Smith, M.T. 1978. Cytological changes in artificially aged seeds during imbibition. Proc.Electron Microsc. Soc. Southern Africa 8: 105–106.Smith, M.T. 1989. The ultrastructure of physiological necrosis in cotyledons of lettuce seeds(Lactuca sativa L.). Seed Sci. Technol. 17: 453–462.Stapel, C. and Bovein, P. 1943. Mark frøafrødernes Sygdomme og Skadedyr. Det Kgl. DanskeLandhusholdnings Selskab, Copenhagen.Villiers, T.A. 1973. Ageing and longevity of seed in field conditions. In Seed Ecology.Heydecker, W. Ed. Butterworths, London, pp. 265–288.Wallace, T. 1951. The Diagnosis of Mineral Deficiencies in Plants by Visual Symptoms. HisMajesty’s Stationery Office, London.
Page 2 and 3:
Histopathology ofSeed-Borne Infecti
Page 4:
PrefaceThe book deals with only one
Page 8 and 9:
The AuthorsDalbir Singh, Ph.D., for
Page 10 and 11:
ContentsChapter 1 Introduction ....
Page 12 and 13:
4.3.2 Routes for Infection from Ova
Page 14:
8.4 Survival in Seed ..............
Page 17 and 18:
2 Histopathology of Seed-Borne Infe
Page 19 and 20:
4 Histopathology of Seed-Borne Infe
Page 22 and 23:
2Reproductive Structuresand Seed Fo
Page 24 and 25:
Reproductive Structures and Seed Fo
Page 26:
Page 29 and 30:
14 Histopathology of Seed-Borne Inf
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
3Structure of SeedsThe seed habit i
Page 64 and 65:
Structure of Seeds 49(1971) of usin
Page 66 and 67:
Structure of Seeds 51is found in as
Page 68 and 69:
Structure of Seeds 53dry seed of Ly
Page 70 and 71:
Structure of Seeds 553.3.2 SEED COA
Page 72 and 73:
Structure of Seeds 57Endosperm: One
Page 74 and 75:
Structure of Seeds 59scendembepsmuA
Page 76 and 77:
Structure of Seeds 61Endosperm: Sca
Page 78 and 79:
Structure of Seeds 63Chalaza simple
Page 80 and 81:
Structure of Seeds 65stystypmerA Bc
Page 82 and 83:
Structure of Seeds 67epsent endCADB
Page 84 and 85:
Structure of Seeds 69perhscendembpe
Page 86 and 87:
Structure of Seeds 71eposgepi′epo
Page 88 and 89:
Structure of Seeds 73(Zea and Sorgh
Page 90 and 91:
Structure of Seeds 75Baker, D.M. an
Page 92 and 93:
Structure of Seeds 77Maheshwari Dev
Page 94:
Structure of Seeds 79Vries, M.A. de
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
100 Histopathology of Seed-Borne In
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
TABLE 5.6Location of Mycelium of St
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 214 and 215:
7Seed Infection by VirusesViruses a
Page 216 and 217:
Seed Infection by Viruses 201TABLE
Page 218 and 219:
Seed Infection by Viruses 203TABLE
Page 220 and 221:
Seed Infection by Viruses 205Unlike
Page 222 and 223:
Seed Infection by Viruses 2073. The
Page 224 and 225: Seed Infection by Viruses 209Wilcox
Page 226 and 227: Seed Infection by Viruses 211TABLE
Page 228 and 229: Seed Infection by Viruses 213floret
Page 230 and 231: Seed Infection by Viruses 215ptowvv
Page 232 and 233: Seed Infection by Viruses 2177.4.2
Page 234 and 235: Seed Infection by Viruses 219seed(s
Page 236 and 237: Seed Infection by Viruses 221AMV fo
Page 238 and 239: Seed Infection by Viruses 223REFERE
Page 240 and 241: Seed Infection by Viruses 225Hunter
Page 242: Seed Infection by Viruses 227Wolf,
Page 245 and 246: 230 Histopathology of Seed-Borne In
Page 273: 258 Histopathology of Seed-Borne In
Page 297: 282 Histopathology of Seed-Borne In
show all

Histopathology of Seed-Borne Infections - Applied Research Center ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?