Bogus clusters and vowel syncope119segments are not permitted nor are segments which share more than oneelement (see section 3 above). Since [tl], [dl] clusters do have more thanone element in common this solution is, like the previous one, doomed tofailure and hence must be abandoned. 10 According to Brockhaus (1995)the latter ban is responsible for the absence of the word-initial [tl], [dl],[tn], [dn] clusters not only in English but also in German. Ruling out bothcoda-onset and branching onset representations, she is left with the thirdsolution, i.e. bogus clusters. Recall from the previous section that such clustersare represented as two onsets separated by the empty nucleus. Brockhaus(1995:191) justifies her choice by indicating that this empty nuclearposition is actually a vowel-zero alternation site (12).(12)RodelEdelbesiedelnhandelnPendelOrdentlich[ ® roÉd«l][ ® /eÉd«l][b« ® ziÉd«ln][ ® hand«ln][ ® pEnd«l][ ® /OŒ8d«ntlI]® ‘toboggan’‘noble’‘settle’‘act’‘pendulum’‘tidy’Brockhaus (1995:191) explains in a footnote that the examples in(12) illustrate careful pronunciation and that in rapid and/or casualspeech the schwa is not usually realised but the following sonorant becomessyllabic instead. Thus, the conclusion that can be drawn from the dataabove is that in German, just as in English, word-medial [tl]/[dl] and [tn]/[dn] sequences are separated by the empty nucleus. In short, they arebogus clusters. Brockhaus (1995) extends this solution to cover theremaining clusters in (11), that is, [bn]/[pn], [bl]/[pl] and [gn]/[kn], [gl]/[kl]. Note that the GP model points to the possibility of grantinga branching onset status to the [p/bl] and [g/kl] clusters. This solution,however, is once again ruled out by Brockhaus (1995), who points outthat in (11) such clusters are spurious. This is especially true in the caseof [kl] sequences. Very briefly, the realisation of the word-medial [kl] clustersin (11) has two variants, i.e., it can be realised as [k] plus the sonorantor the obstruent is weakened to the fricative [], [x] before [l]. Whatis crucial here is the fact that the latter change never appears in theword-initial position. She concludes that [kl] clusters are ambiguous inGerman. In other words, they constitute a branching onset word-initial-10Brockhaus (1995) works in a slightly different model of segmental representation.In her version nodes have to be taken into account for working out the complexityof an expression. This is not, however, essential to the present discussion.
120 Bogus clusters, syllabic consonants and vowel syncope. . .ly but a sequence of onsets separated by the empty nucleus word-internally.In order to prove her point, i.e. that the forms in (11) are bogusclusters, Brockhaus (1995:194) provides additional examples of thevowel-zero alternations (13).(13)BibelZwiebelKübelübelbügelnregeln[ ® bi:b«l][ ® tsviÉb«l][ ® kyÉb«l][ ® /yÉb«l][ ® byÉg«ln][ ® reÉg«ln]‘Bible’‘onion’‘vat’‘bad’‘iron’‘regulate’ebenSegenRegeneigenschmuggelnKugel[ ® /eÉb«n][ ® zeÉg«n][ ® reÉg«n][ ® /aIg«n][ ® SmUg«ln][ ® kuÉg«l]‘level’ (adj.)‘blessing’‘rain’‘own’‘smuggle’‘ball’The conclusion at which she arrives, therefore, is that word-medial obstruentplus sonorant clusters in (11) are separated by the alternatingvowel which surfaces in related forms (13). In other words, the underivedforms of the stems in (13) indicate that all the clusters in (11) aboveare in fact bogus clusters — they are separated by the empty nuclear position.Moreover, Brockhaus (1995) captures the difference betweenthe dialects in (11) by claiming that in NSG both final and medialempty nuclei can trigger obstruent devoicing, while in Hochlautung onlyfinal empty nuclei are able to devoice the preceding obstruent. Since ourmain concern in this chapter is the representation of bogus clusters andnot FOD, we shall refer to the latter phenomenon only sporadically. Forthe analysis of FOD in German see Rubach (1990), W iese (1991),Hall (1992), Brockhaus (1995). Finally, it should be noted that in(13), just as in (12) above, the schwa can be replaced by the syllabic consonantin rapid speech. Another problem Brockhaus (1995) addressesin her analysis and which is of particular interest to us is the appearanceof obstruent plus nasal clusters word-initially. To put it differently,if such combinations are claimed to be bogus clusters word-internally,what is then the representation of the same clusters in the wordinitialposition (14). 1111The list in (14) is quoted after Brockhaus (1995:194) who additionally incorporatesword-initial [pn] and [sl] clusters into this set.
- Page 2 and 3:
Polish and EnglishConsonantal Clust
- Page 4 and 5:
Artur KijakPolish and EnglishConson
- Page 6 and 7:
ContentsPreface . . . . . . . . . .
- Page 8 and 9:
PrefaceThe phonotactic peculiaritie
- Page 10 and 11:
Preface92000), Ploch (1999), van de
- Page 12:
List of abbreviationsBrODIdim.FODge
- Page 15 and 16:
14 The frameworkemploying the simpl
- Page 17 and 18:
16 The frameworksion in section 3 b
- Page 19 and 20:
18 The frameworkmodel is able to ha
- Page 21 and 22:
20 The frameworkhanan 1986). Thus,
- Page 23 and 24:
22 The frameworkare not derived at
- Page 25 and 26:
24 The frameworkWhat is interesting
- Page 27 and 28:
26 The frameworklateral relations,
- Page 29 and 30:
28 The frameworkIn general, we can
- Page 31 and 32:
30 The frameworkobstruents followed
- Page 33 and 34:
32 The frameworkLet us look more de
- Page 35 and 36:
34 The framework(7) PGO N O N O N O
- Page 37 and 38:
36 The frameworkby all sounds. Thus
- Page 39 and 40:
38 The frameworkexist. What is a Br
- Page 41 and 42:
40The frameworkLowenstamm’s (1999
- Page 43 and 44:
42 The frameworksky and Halle’s (
- Page 45 and 46:
44 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 47 and 48:
46 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 49 and 50:
48 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 51 and 52:
50 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 53 and 54:
52 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 55 and 56:
54 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 57 and 58:
56 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 59 and 60:
58 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 61 and 62:
60 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 63 and 64:
62 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 65 and 66:
64 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 67 and 68:
66 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 69 and 70: 68 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 71 and 72: 70 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 73 and 74: 72 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 75 and 76: 74 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 77 and 78: 76 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 79 and 80: 78 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 81 and 82: 80 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 83 and 84: 82 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 85 and 86: 84 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 87 and 88: 86 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 89 and 90: 88 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 91 and 92: 90 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 93 and 94: 92 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 95 and 96: 94 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 97 and 98: 96 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 99 and 100: 98 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 101 and 102: III. Bogus clusters, syllabic conso
- Page 103 and 104: 102 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 105 and 106: 104 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 107 and 108: 106 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 109 and 110: 108 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 111 and 112: 110 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 113 and 114: 112 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 115 and 116: 114 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 117 and 118: 116 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 119: 118 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 123 and 124: 122 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 125 and 126: 124 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 127 and 128: 126 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 129 and 130: 128 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 131 and 132: 130 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 133 and 134: 132 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 135 and 136: 134 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 137 and 138: 136 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 139 and 140: 138 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 141 and 142: 140 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 143 and 144: 142 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 145 and 146: 144 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 147 and 148: 146 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 149 and 150: 148 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 151 and 152: 150 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 153 and 154: 152 Conclusionnisms available in th
- Page 155 and 156: 154 ReferencesBotma, B. (2004) Phon
- Page 157 and 158: 156 ReferencesGussmann, E. (1998) D
- Page 159 and 160: 158 ReferencesPawelec, P. (1989) Cy
- Page 161 and 162: 160 ReferencesScheer, T. (1997) Vow
- Page 164 and 165: Author indexAbercrombie, David 103A
- Page 166 and 167: Artur KijakGrupy spó³g³oskowe w
- Page 168 and 169: Zusammenfassung167für alle anderen