Untitled

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References159Rodgers, J. (1998) Vowel devoicing in English. Ph.D. dissertation. Universityof Cambridge.Rowicka, G. (1999a) On ghost vowels: a strict CV approach. Ph.D. dissertation.University of Leiden.Rowicka, G. (1999b) On trochaic Proper Government. In J. Rennison andK. Kühnhammer (eds.), 273—288.Rowicka, G. (1999c) Prosodic optimality and prefixation in Polish. In R. K a -g e r, H. van der Hulst and W. Zonneveld (eds.) The prosody-morphologyinterface, 367—389. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Rowicka, G. (2001) How far can you go? Vowelless roots and clusters in Polish.In G. Zybatow, U. Junghans, G. Mehlhorn and L. Szucsi c h (eds.) Current issues in formal Slavic linguistics, 15—24. Frankfurtam Main: Lang.Rowicka, G. (2003) /r/ syllabicity: Polish versus Bulgarian and Serbo-Croatian.In S. Ploch (ed.) Living on the edge. 28 Papers in Honour of JonathanKaye, 511—526. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Rubach, J. (1974) Syllabic consonants in Polish. Journal of Phonetics 2, 109—116.Rubach, J. (1984) Cyclic and lexical phonology: the structure of Polish.Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Rubach, J. (1986) Abstract vowels in three dimensional phonology: the yers.The Linguistic Review 5, 247—280.Rubach, J. (1990) Final devoicing and cyclic syllabification in German. LinguisticInquiry 21, 79—94.Rubach, J. (1993) The lexical phonology of Slovak. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Rubach, J. (1996) Nonsyllabic analysis of voice assimilation in Polish. LinguisticInquiry 27, 69—110.Rubach, J. (1997a) Extrasyllabic consonants in Polish: Derivational OptimalityTheory. In I. Roca (ed.) Derivations and constraints in phonology, 551—582. New York: Oxford University Press.Rubach, J. (1997b) Polish voice assimilation in Optimality Theory. Rivista diLinguistica 9, 291—342.Rubach, J. and G. Booij (1984) Morphological and prosodic domains in LexicalPhonology. Phonology 1, 1—27.Rubach, J. and G. B o o i j (1987) Postcyclic versus postlexical rules in LexicalPhonology. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 1—44.Rubach, J. and G. Booij (1990a) Syllable structure assignment in Polish.Phonology 7, 121—158.Rubach, J. and G. Booij (1990b) Edge of constituent effects in Polish. NaturalLanguage and Linguistic Theory 8, 427—463.Sawicka, I. (1995) Fonologia. In H. Wróbel (ed.) Gramatyka wspó³czesnajêzyka polskiego. Vol. Fonetyka i fonologia, 107—198. Kraków: Instytut JêzykaPolskiego PAN.Scheer, T. (1996) Une théorie de l’interaction directe entre consonnes. Ph.D.dissertation. Paris: University of Paris 7.
160 ReferencesScheer, T. (1997) Vowel-zero alternations and their support for a theory ofconsonantal interaction. In P.M. Bertinetto, L. Gaeta, G. Jetchevand D. Michaels (eds.) Certamen Phonologicum III, 67—88. Torino: Rosenbergand Sellier.Scheer, T. (1998a) A unified model of Proper Government. The Linguistic Review15, 41—67.Scheer, T. (1998b) Governing domains are head-final. In E. Cyran (ed.),261—285.Scheer, T. (1999a) A theory of consonantal interaction. Folia Linguistica 32,201—237.Scheer, T. (1999b) On constraints vs. non-circular approaches to word-initialclusters. In J. Rennison and K. Kühnhammer (eds.), 289—304.Scheer, T. (2003) What sonorants do in positional plight. Paper presented atthe 11 th Manchester Phonology Meeting, Manchester.Scheer, T. (2004) A lateral theory of phonology. Vol. 1: What is CVCV, and whyshould it be? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Scheer, T. (forth) How yers made Lightner, Rubach, Gussmann, Spencer & Coinvent CVCV. In P. Bañski and B. £ukaszewicz (eds.) Phonology inPoland. München: Lincom.Scheer, T. and Ph. Ségéral (2001) Les séquences consonne + yod en galloroman.Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 30, 87—120.Schein, B. and D. Steriade (1986) On geminates. Linguistic Inquiry 17,691—744.Ségéral, Ph. and T. Scheer (1999) Is the Coda Mirror a phonological object?Paper presented at the First Annual Meeting of the GDR 1954 “Phonologie”on Lenition and Fortition, Nice.Selkirk, E. (1982) The syllable. In H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (eds.)The structure of phonological representations, Part II, 337—383. Dordrecht:Foris Publications.Selkirk, E. (1984) On the major class features and syllable theory. In M. Aronoffand R.T. Oehrle (eds.) Language sound structure: studies in phonologypresented to Morris Halle by his teacher and students, 107—136.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Siegel, D. (1979) Topics in English Morphology. New York and London: Garland.Spencer, A. (1986) A nonlinear analysis of vowel-zero alternations in Polish.Journal of Linguistics 22, 249—280.Stanley, R. (1973) Boundaries in phonology. In S. Anderson and P. K i -parsky (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 185—206. New York.Stieber, Z. (1973) A historical phonology of the Polish language. Heidelberg:Carl Winter, Universitätsverlag.Stieber, Z. (1979) Zarys gramatyki porównawczej jêzyków s³owiañskich. Warszawa:PWN.Szigetvári, P. (1999) VC Phonology: a theory of consonant lenition and phonotactics.Ph.D. dissertation. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University.
Page 2 and 3:
Polish and EnglishConsonantal Clust
Page 4 and 5:
Artur KijakPolish and EnglishConson
Page 6 and 7:
ContentsPreface . . . . . . . . . .
Page 8 and 9:
PrefaceThe phonotactic peculiaritie
Page 10 and 11:
Preface92000), Ploch (1999), van de
Page 12:
List of abbreviationsBrODIdim.FODge
Page 15 and 16:
14 The frameworkemploying the simpl
Page 17 and 18:
16 The frameworksion in section 3 b
Page 19 and 20:
18 The frameworkmodel is able to ha
Page 21 and 22:
20 The frameworkhanan 1986). Thus,
Page 23 and 24:
22 The frameworkare not derived at
Page 25 and 26:
24 The frameworkWhat is interesting
Page 27 and 28:
26 The frameworklateral relations,
Page 29 and 30:
28 The frameworkIn general, we can
Page 31 and 32:
30 The frameworkobstruents followed
Page 33 and 34:
32 The frameworkLet us look more de
Page 35 and 36:
34 The framework(7) PGO N O N O N O
Page 37 and 38:
36 The frameworkby all sounds. Thus
Page 39 and 40:
38 The frameworkexist. What is a Br
Page 41 and 42:
40The frameworkLowenstamm’s (1999
Page 43 and 44:
42 The frameworksky and Halle’s (
Page 45 and 46:
44 The phonological nature of the b
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
III. Bogus clusters, syllabic conso
Page 103 and 104:
102 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110: 108 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
Page 153 and 154: 152 Conclusionnisms available in th
Page 155 and 156: 154 ReferencesBotma, B. (2004) Phon
Page 157 and 158: 156 ReferencesGussmann, E. (1998) D
Page 159: 158 ReferencesPawelec, P. (1989) Cy
Page 164 and 165: Author indexAbercrombie, David 103A
Page 166 and 167: Artur KijakGrupy spó³g³oskowe w
Page 168 and 169: Zusammenfassung167für alle anderen
show all

Untitled

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?