Untitled

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ContentsPreface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .List of abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I. The framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2. Strict CV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3. Boundary markers in phonological theory . . . . . . . .3.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3.2. Disjunctive context and the rise of coda . . . . . . . .3.3. Phonological domains . . . . . . . . . . . .3.3.1. Domain final empty nuclei . . . . . . . . .4. Shortcomings of the Sonority Sequencing Principle . . . . . .4.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.2. Some unanswered questions in English and Polish phonotactics .5. Consonantal interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . .5.1. Infrasegmental Government . . . . . . . . . .5.2. Initial empty CV unit . . . . . . . . . . . .6. Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .II. The phonological nature of the beginning of the word . .1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2. Left margin in Polish . . . . . . . . . . . . .2.1. Prefixation and the consonant clusters . . . . . . . .2.2. /m/ as a potential governee . . . . . . . . . . .2.3. #RT sequences revisited . . . . . . . . . . .3. Three-consonant sequences . . . . . . . . . . . .3.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3.2. #RTR and #TTR sequences . . . . . . . . . . .711131314181819202226262831333741434344475358616162
6 Contents3.3. Trapped consonants and transparency to voice assimilation . .3.4. Syllabic vs. trapped consonants . . . . . . . . . .3.5. Trapped consonants and prefixation . . . . . . . .3.6. Towards a solution . . . . . . . . . . . . .4. On the development of soft labials in northern Poland . . . . .4.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.2. Soft labials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.2.1. Phonological status of soft labials . . . . . . .4.2.2. The realisation of soft labials in the north-eastern dialects .4.3. The Coda Mirror (Ségéral and Scheer 1999) . . . . .4.4. Two-segment analysis of soft labials in the Kurp dialect . . . .4.5. Yod fortition in Gallo-Romance . . . . . . . . . .5. Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .III. Bogus clusters, syllabic consonants and vowel syncope andwhat they have in common . . . . . . . . . .1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2. Syllabic consonants . . . . . . . . . . . . .2.1. Some English facts . . . . . . . . . . . . .2.2. Syllabic consonants in German . . . . . . . . . .3. Bogus clusters and vowel syncope . . . . . . . . . .3.1. English case . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3.2. German case . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3.2.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . .3.2.2. Bogus clusters in German . . . . . . . . .4. Sonorant conspiracy . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.2. Partial geminates in German (Scheer 2003) . . . . .4.3. English syllabic consonants . . . . . . . . . . .4.3.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.3.2. In search of a unified context for syllabic consonants . . .4.3.3. Vowel-syncope . . . . . . . . . . . .4.4. Bogus clusters revisited . . . . . . . . . . .5. Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Author index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Streszczenie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Zusammenfassung . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .65727579838385858789939597100100101103106110110116116117123123124132132132139143149151153163165166
Page 2 and 3: Polish and EnglishConsonantal Clust
Page 4 and 5: Artur KijakPolish and EnglishConson
Page 8 and 9: PrefaceThe phonotactic peculiaritie
Page 10 and 11: Preface92000), Ploch (1999), van de
Page 12: List of abbreviationsBrODIdim.FODge
Page 15 and 16: 14 The frameworkemploying the simpl
Page 17 and 18: 16 The frameworksion in section 3 b
Page 19 and 20: 18 The frameworkmodel is able to ha
Page 21 and 22: 20 The frameworkhanan 1986). Thus,
Page 23 and 24: 22 The frameworkare not derived at
Page 25 and 26: 24 The frameworkWhat is interesting
Page 27 and 28: 26 The frameworklateral relations,
Page 29 and 30: 28 The frameworkIn general, we can
Page 31 and 32: 30 The frameworkobstruents followed
Page 33 and 34: 32 The frameworkLet us look more de
Page 35 and 36: 34 The framework(7) PGO N O N O N O
Page 37 and 38: 36 The frameworkby all sounds. Thus
Page 39 and 40: 38 The frameworkexist. What is a Br
Page 41 and 42: 40The frameworkLowenstamm’s (1999
Page 43 and 44: 42 The frameworksky and Halle’s (
Page 45 and 46: 44 The phonological nature of the b
Page 57 and 58:
56 The phonological nature of the b
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
III. Bogus clusters, syllabic conso
Page 103 and 104:
102 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
152 Conclusionnisms available in th
Page 155 and 156:
154 ReferencesBotma, B. (2004) Phon
Page 157 and 158:
156 ReferencesGussmann, E. (1998) D
Page 159 and 160:
158 ReferencesPawelec, P. (1989) Cy
Page 161 and 162:
160 ReferencesScheer, T. (1997) Vow
Page 164 and 165:
Author indexAbercrombie, David 103A
Page 166 and 167:
Artur KijakGrupy spó³g³oskowe w
Page 168 and 169:
Zusammenfassung167für alle anderen
show all

Untitled

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?