On the development of soft labials...89b. internal clusterso[f‚]arapara[f‚]azdro[vó]ew g³o[vó]eru[m]anekpa[m]êtamo[‚]arapara[‚]azdro[ó]ew g³o[ó]eru[]anekpa[]êtam‘victim’‘parish’‘health’‘in the head’‘camomile’‘I remember’Summing up, the data presented in this section lead to two immediateobservations. Firstly, what we are faced with here must be a fortitionprocess, i.e. the front glide [j] is strengthened either to the palatal fricative[p ® j]asek > [pX ® ]asek or the prepalatal fricative/nasal, e.g. [p ® j]asek >[p‚]asek, [m ® j]asto > [m]asto, ‘sand’, ‘city’, respectively. Secondly, the glideis strengthened only in the post-consonantal position and never wordinitially,intervocalically or in the preconsonantal position, e.g. jab³ko‘apple’, nawijaæ ‘to wind’ and stajnia ‘stable’ respectively. Note that insuch contexts the glide never reacts in either of the dialects mentionedabove. Furthermore, if we are dealing here with a fortition phenomenon,it means that the glide appendix /j/ must be assigned the status of a separatesegment, at least in those dialects. This conclusion allies us withthe supporters of the two-segment analysis. However, before we proposea solution to the problem outlined in this section, we should first introducethe theory of lenition called The Coda Mirror (Ségéral and Scheer 1999). This theory is presented in the following section.4.3. The Coda Mirror (Ségéral and Scheer 1999)The Coda Mirror put forward by Ségéral and Scheer (1999) isa theory of consonant lenition that operates on the strict CV skeleton. Inthis theory the melodic structure of segments is modified depending onthe particular position they occupy in the string. The authors predictfive crucial positions in which consonants may appear and which exertan influence on them, that is, word initial #_, after a heterosyllabic consonantC._, intervocalically V_V, before a heterosyllabic consonant _.C and word finally _#. The main idea behind the Coda Mirror, however,is to identify the disjunctive context C._ and #_ which stands in oppositionto the coda position, i.e. _.C and _#. A word of clarification is in orderhere. It may seem alluring to state that since the latter two positions are
90 The phonological nature of the beginning of the wordusually ascribed to coda, the former ones should belong to onset. Itis generally accepted that consonants in codas undergo lenition whilethose in onsets are protected from this fate. However, the traditionalsyllabification procedures are of no use here. Note that in GovernmentPhonology the coda as a constituent does not resemble the traditionalcoda whatsoever. In this model the coda is reduced to a post-nuclearrhymal complement which may exist only when followed by an onset(Kaye 1990, Harris and Gussmann 1998, 2002). Thus, inGP word-final consonants are never codas. Furthermore, in the StrictCV model codas as constituents do not gain formal status; they are simplyabsent from the theory. As for the Coda Mirror context, i.e. #_and C._, it is again not possible to associate this disjunctivity with thetraditional onset. This is so because there is another context whichis traditionally recognised as onset, the intervocalic position, but this,unlike the former two, is affected by the lenition rather than the fortitionphenomena. It is generally prone to lenition and hence weak butthe lenition effects it shows are different in kind from those observedin the traditional coda. It follows that the intervocalic position cannotbe an onset (as it is weak) and it cannot be a coda either (different effects).The conclusion drawn from the discussion above is that any theoryof lenition should recognise at least five relevant positions, which arerepresented in (44) below. The diagram is taken from Scheer(2004:116).(44)Position in the stringstrong positionweak positiontraditional coda intervocalic#_ C._ _.C _# V_VSégéral and Scheer (1999) point out that the disjunctive definitionof both the strong and weak contexts can be given a uniform explanationif the strict CV skeleton and Lowenstamm’s (1999) proposalto exchange the boundary marker with the empty CV unit are accepted.Consider first the representation of both the strong (45) and the weakcontext (46), where the relevant positions are underlined.
- Page 2 and 3:
Polish and EnglishConsonantal Clust
- Page 4 and 5:
Artur KijakPolish and EnglishConson
- Page 6 and 7:
ContentsPreface . . . . . . . . . .
- Page 8 and 9:
PrefaceThe phonotactic peculiaritie
- Page 10 and 11:
Preface92000), Ploch (1999), van de
- Page 12:
List of abbreviationsBrODIdim.FODge
- Page 15 and 16:
14 The frameworkemploying the simpl
- Page 17 and 18:
16 The frameworksion in section 3 b
- Page 19 and 20:
18 The frameworkmodel is able to ha
- Page 21 and 22:
20 The frameworkhanan 1986). Thus,
- Page 23 and 24:
22 The frameworkare not derived at
- Page 25 and 26:
24 The frameworkWhat is interesting
- Page 27 and 28:
26 The frameworklateral relations,
- Page 29 and 30:
28 The frameworkIn general, we can
- Page 31 and 32:
30 The frameworkobstruents followed
- Page 33 and 34:
32 The frameworkLet us look more de
- Page 35 and 36:
34 The framework(7) PGO N O N O N O
- Page 37 and 38:
36 The frameworkby all sounds. Thus
- Page 39 and 40: 38 The frameworkexist. What is a Br
- Page 41 and 42: 40The frameworkLowenstamm’s (1999
- Page 43 and 44: 42 The frameworksky and Halle’s (
- Page 45 and 46: 44 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 47 and 48: 46 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 49 and 50: 48 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 51 and 52: 50 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 53 and 54: 52 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 55 and 56: 54 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 57 and 58: 56 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 59 and 60: 58 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 61 and 62: 60 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 63 and 64: 62 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 65 and 66: 64 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 67 and 68: 66 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 69 and 70: 68 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 71 and 72: 70 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 73 and 74: 72 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 75 and 76: 74 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 77 and 78: 76 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 79 and 80: 78 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 81 and 82: 80 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 83 and 84: 82 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 85 and 86: 84 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 87 and 88: 86 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 89: 88 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 93 and 94: 92 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 95 and 96: 94 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 97 and 98: 96 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 99 and 100: 98 The phonological nature of the b
- Page 101 and 102: III. Bogus clusters, syllabic conso
- Page 103 and 104: 102 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 105 and 106: 104 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 107 and 108: 106 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 109 and 110: 108 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 111 and 112: 110 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 113 and 114: 112 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 115 and 116: 114 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 117 and 118: 116 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 119 and 120: 118 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 121 and 122: 120 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 123 and 124: 122 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 125 and 126: 124 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 127 and 128: 126 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 129 and 130: 128 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 131 and 132: 130 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 133 and 134: 132 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 135 and 136: 134 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 137 and 138: 136 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 139 and 140: 138 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 141 and 142:
140 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 143 and 144:
142 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 145 and 146:
144 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 147 and 148:
146 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 149 and 150:
148 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 151 and 152:
150 Bogus clusters, syllabic conson
- Page 153 and 154:
152 Conclusionnisms available in th
- Page 155 and 156:
154 ReferencesBotma, B. (2004) Phon
- Page 157 and 158:
156 ReferencesGussmann, E. (1998) D
- Page 159 and 160:
158 ReferencesPawelec, P. (1989) Cy
- Page 161 and 162:
160 ReferencesScheer, T. (1997) Vow
- Page 164 and 165:
Author indexAbercrombie, David 103A
- Page 166 and 167:
Artur KijakGrupy spó³g³oskowe w
- Page 168 and 169:
Zusammenfassung167für alle anderen