04.12.2012 Views

LIBRO-CONGRESO-CITRUS

LIBRO-CONGRESO-CITRUS

LIBRO-CONGRESO-CITRUS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S20P09<br />

Dissipation and residue of 2,4-D in citrus fruits<br />

Chen W. J. 1 , Su X. S. 2 , Zhao Q. Y. 1 , and Jiao B. N. 1<br />

1 Citrus Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China; and 2 School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering,<br />

Southwest University, China. bljiao@tom.com<br />

The dissipation and residue of 2,4-D in citrus fruits under field conditions were studied. The field trial was<br />

conducted in three provinces of China. An analytical method using QuEChERS cleanup and ultra performance<br />

liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) was successfully applied to analyze 2,4-D<br />

in citrus fruits. The recoveries were in the range of 85.0-%-107.8-% at three spike levels with relative standard<br />

deviations of 1.0-%-4.6-%. The results showed that the dissipation kinetics of 2,4-D in citrus fruits did not<br />

follow with the first-degree reaction pattern. The degradation rate of 2,4-D in citrus at 65 days (2010) and 75<br />

days (2011) were 42.7-77.3% and 31.2-59.1%. The terminal residues in pulp peel and whole fruits were all<br />

bellow the maximum residue limit (MRL) value set by European Union (EU) (1 mg/kg). Two supervised trials<br />

on the post-harvest use of 2,4-D on orange and ‘Ponkan’ mandarin were also conducted. The residues of 2,4-<br />

D at day 0 in orange samples treated with the 200 mg ai/L 2,4-D solution and in ‘Ponkan’ samples treated with<br />

the 250 mg ai/L 2,4-D solution were 0.122 mg/kg and 0.265 mg/kg, respectively, both bellow the MRL set<br />

by EU. The degradation rate of 2,4-D in orange and ‘Ponkan’ fruit after 96 days and 93 days were 55.6% and<br />

76.5%. Hence it was safe for the use of 2,4-D and the results could give a reference for MRL setting of 2,4-D<br />

in citrus fruits in China.<br />

S20P10<br />

Effect of pesticide spray volumes and doses on the production of marketable lemons in Tucumán,<br />

Argentina<br />

Salas López H. 1 , Mansilla C. 2 , Figueroa D. 1 , Carrizo B. 1 , Rojas A. 1 , Campos A. 1 , and Goane L. 1<br />

1 Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC), Fruticultura, Argentina; and 2 <strong>CITRUS</strong>VIL, Argentina.<br />

hsalas@eeaoc.org.ar<br />

Current management of lemon trees includes different pesticide volumes and doses. Field trials were<br />

conducted in lemon orchards located in two climatically and ecologically different regions throughout<br />

three years to evaluate the impact of three spray volumes (10000, 5000 and 2000 L/ha) and three doses of<br />

pesticides (high, medium and low) on lemon fruit health. The highest pesticide dose consisted of 15 kg/ha<br />

of a commercial product of copper hydroxide (53.8%), 100 L/ha of mineral oil and 2 L/ha of a commercial<br />

product of abamectin (1.8%); medium and lowest doses had the same components, but different quantities:<br />

the medium 7.5 kg, 50 L and 1 L, respectively, and the lowest 3 kg, 20 L and 0.4 L per hectare respectively.<br />

Trials were conducted in a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Healthy fruit percentage<br />

was estimated at harvest from approximately 2.000 fruits per plot. Damaged fruits were separately analyzed<br />

to discriminate the main cause for rejection: wind, pests or diseases. Independently of doses, healthy fruit<br />

proportion was significantly higher in plots sprayed with high and medium pesticide volume. Such treatments<br />

were more efficient for controlling pests (mealybugs, mites and thrips) mainly, although they resulted in a<br />

higher proportion of fruit damaged by wind. The study demonstrated that a reduction of pesticide spray<br />

volume (to 5000 L/ha) and doses is possible without affecting fruit quality.<br />

XII INTERNATIONAL <strong>CITRUS</strong> CONGRESS 2012 - 349<br />

S20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!