The Great Controversy - Righteousness is Love

528AND THE DIVIDING OF TIME" (DANIEL 7:25), THE "FORTY ANDTWO MONTHS" (REVELATION 11:2; 13:5), AND THE "THOUSANDTWO HUNDRED AND THREESCORE DAYS" (REVELATION 11:3;12:6).ORIGINAL TEXT PAGE 56. FORGED WRITINGS.--AMONG THEDOCUMENTS THAT AT THE PRESENT TIME ARE GENERALLYADMITTED TO BE FORGERIES, THE DONATION OFCONSTANTINE AND THE PSEUDO-ISIDORIAN DECRETALS AREOF PRIMARY IMPORTANCE. "THE 'DONATION OF CONSTANTINE'IS THE NAME TRADITIONALLY APPLIED, SINCE THE LATERMIDDLE AGES, TO A DOCUMENT PURPORTING TO HAVE BEENADDRESSED BY CONSTANTINE THE GREAT TO POPESYLVESTER I, WHICH IS FOUND FIRST IN A PARISIANMANUSCRIPT (CODEX LAT. 2777) OF PROBABLY THE BEGINNINGOF THE NINTH CENTURY. SINCE THE ELEVENTH CENTURY ITHAS BEEN USED AS A POWERFUL ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF THEPAPAL CLAIMS, AND CONSEQUENTLY SINCE THE TWELFTH ITHAS BEEN THE SUBJECT OF A VIGOROUS CONTROVERSY. ATTHE SAME TIME, BY RENDERING IT POSSIBLE TO REGARD THEPAPACY AS A MIDDLE TERM BETWEEN THE ORIGINAL AND THEMEDIEVAL ROMAN EMPIRE, AND THUS TO FORM ATHEORETICAL BASIS OF CONTINUITY FOR THE RECEPTION OFTHE ROMAN LAW IN THE MIDDLE AGES, IT HAS HAD NO SMALLINFLUENCE UPON SECULAR HISTORY."—THE NEW SCHAFF-HERZOG ENCYCLOPEDIA OF RELIGIOUS KNOWLEDGE, VOL. 3,ART. "DONATION OF CONSTANTINE," PP. 484, 485.THE HISTORICAL THEORY DEVELOPED IN THE "DONATION" ISFULLY DISCUSSED IN HENRY E. CARDINAL MANNING'S THETEMPORAL POWER OF THE VICAR OF JESUS CHRIST, LONDON,1862. THE ARGUMENTS OF THE "DONATION" WERE OF ASCHOLASTIC TYPE, AND THE POSSIBILITY OF A FORGERY WASNOT MENTIONED UNTIL THE RISE OF HISTORICAL CRITICISM INTHE FIFTEENTH CENTURY. NICHOLAS OF CUSA WAS AMONGTHE FIRST TO CONCLUDE THAT CONSTANTINE NEVER MADEANY SUCH DONATION. LORENZA VALLA IN ITALY GAVE ABRILLIANT DEMONSTRATION OF ITS SPURIOUSNESS IN 1450.SEE CHRISTOPHER B. COLEMAN'S TREATISE OF LORENZO VALLAON THE DONATION OF CONSTANTINE (NEW YORK, 1927). FOR A