30.07.2015 Views

Proceedings in pdf format. - Sociotechnical Systems Engineering ...

Proceedings in pdf format. - Sociotechnical Systems Engineering ...

Proceedings in pdf format. - Sociotechnical Systems Engineering ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

learn<strong>in</strong>g skills and attentional parameters and (2)material’s type characterized by <strong>in</strong>teractivity parameters(game-like material, read<strong>in</strong>g/view<strong>in</strong>g material, etc.).E-Gestures and Good Content IndicatorsGood electronic learn<strong>in</strong>g materials have (1) goodcontent and (2) good content organization (navigation,design style guides, etc.).Strategies of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g good content are very differentfor each learner. Learners have different knowledge,different skills, different learn<strong>in</strong>g objectives, differentlearn<strong>in</strong>g paths, and different positions with<strong>in</strong> theparticular learn<strong>in</strong>g path. All this must lead to vary<strong>in</strong>gperception of what a good content (1) for a specificstudent (2) at a specific time actually mean?As the victory march of smart and fast Internet searcheng<strong>in</strong>es has shown, the most commonly used techniqueof f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g good content is us<strong>in</strong>g keywords. Therefore,keywords are probably the today’s top ranked GoodContent Indicators. But as presumably every googler hasnoticed not every GCI po<strong>in</strong>ts to a really valuable content.Table 1 shows how EDUSA’s <strong>in</strong>terpreter processesuser’s e-gestures.DecisionSlot Nr.Table 1. Interpretation of e-gestures.e-GestureDescription of impliedUser actions1 Brows<strong>in</strong>g 1. User has entered a newLearn<strong>in</strong>g Screen (LS -page, slide, w<strong>in</strong>dow scrollregion, etc.)2. User browses the LS forGood Content Indicators(GCI)3. User f<strong>in</strong>ds no GCI4. User leaves the LS2 Discover<strong>in</strong>g 3. User f<strong>in</strong>ds GCI4. User evaluates GCI’s ifthere is really good contentbeh<strong>in</strong>d them5. User f<strong>in</strong>ds no goodcontent beh<strong>in</strong>d the GCI6. User leaves the LS3 Learn<strong>in</strong>g 5. User f<strong>in</strong>ds good contentbeh<strong>in</strong>d the GCI6. User consumes goodcontent = learns (readstext, views image or video,explores diagram, etc.)7. After learn<strong>in</strong>g userleaves the LS4 Logged off 7. After learn<strong>in</strong>g user doesnot leave the LS (gone fora coffee break?)EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS OF E-COURSEEVALUATION USING EDUSAFigure 5 shows the experimental data and calculatedrelative probability of participation <strong>in</strong>tervals <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>teractive multimedia e-course SQL Fundamentals us<strong>in</strong>gEDUSA method: 1 – Learn<strong>in</strong>g curve, 2 – Discoverycurve, 3 – Additive curve (Discovery curve + Learn<strong>in</strong>gcurve).Figure 5. EDUSA measurement of e-course delivery -relative probability of observation <strong>in</strong>tervals <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractivemultimedia e-course SQL Fundamentals.Log file data for the subsequent measurements wererecorded dur<strong>in</strong>g the test<strong>in</strong>g session <strong>in</strong> Liepaja Academyof Pedagogy/Latvia with 25 participants.The subject for tests was SQL Fundamentals e-coursedeveloped at Riga Technical University DistanceEducation Study Centre.Participants explored units 1 to 6 from altogether 14course units. Brows<strong>in</strong>g the web, read<strong>in</strong>g e-mails, chatt<strong>in</strong>gand similar multi-task<strong>in</strong>g activities were explicitlypermitted.Measurements were calculated us<strong>in</strong>g time <strong>in</strong>tervals of250ms. In order to <strong>in</strong>terpret the results, user participationevents (<strong>in</strong>teractivities with computer: mouse clicks,mouse move events, key press events, etc.) wereevaluated.Experimental data shows the presence of twoprobability distributions. Participation events with<strong>in</strong>shorter time <strong>in</strong>tervals, approx. 3 to 8s, were <strong>in</strong>terpreted asDiscover<strong>in</strong>g events (see: Discover<strong>in</strong>g curve, Figure 5),participation events with longer time <strong>in</strong>tervals, approx. 8to 25s, were <strong>in</strong>terpreted as Learn<strong>in</strong>g events (see:Learn<strong>in</strong>g curve, Figure 5).Additive curve was calculated to assess the selected 2-components model of multi-task<strong>in</strong>g evaluation accord<strong>in</strong>gto the recorded data. Both components were described asnormal distribution curves that allowed good<strong>in</strong>terpretation of the results of experiment.Annual <strong>Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs</strong> of Vidzeme University College “ICTE <strong>in</strong> Regional Development”, 200634

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!