04.10.2015 Views

STRUCTURES OF VIOLENCE

4cONo1kTN

4cONo1kTN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

176 | Structures of Violence<br />

before the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir [HC<br />

no.181/1992, a habaes corpus petition].<br />

Notices were issued but the parties, including the<br />

Union of India could not show the authority under<br />

which the victim had been arrested. Therefore, the<br />

High Court, disposed off the petition on 1 September<br />

1992 by holding the arrest of the victim as illegal. On<br />

the continued connement of the victim, the family<br />

led a contempt petition [no.15/1992]. The BSF<br />

denied having arrested the victim. The High Court, on<br />

8 October 1993 ordered an enquiry. This enquiry was<br />

concluded by the District Judge, Bank cases<br />

Commissioner, Srinagar, on 28 July 1994.<br />

The witnesses on behalf of the petitioner conrmed<br />

that the victim had been abducted by BSF personnel.<br />

Further, the mother of Sajad Ahmad Bazaz stated that<br />

she saw that the BSF personnel were accompanied<br />

by “Azad Ganai Alias Asgar”. The father of Sajad<br />

Ahmad Bazaz identied the BSF personnel<br />

responsible for the abduction as “Vinod Kumar”. The<br />

enquiry report found that there was “voluminous, unimpeachable,<br />

impartial and sufcient evidence on<br />

record to show that Sajad Ahmad has been arrested<br />

th<br />

by 30 BN BSF on 12 February 1992.” The enquiry<br />

report notes in particular the written statement of 26<br />

April 1994 by Mahmood-ur-Rehman, Additional Chief<br />

Secretary, Home Department which was submitted<br />

during the enquiry. This statement admits the arrest of<br />

th<br />

the victim by the personnel of the 30 Battalion BSF.<br />

Further, that a chargesheet had been completed<br />

against Deputy Commandant D.S. Rathore and Azad<br />

Ahmad Mir and sanction for prosecution was<br />

submitted to the Government on 25 September 1993<br />

[but, also on record is a letter dated 4 January 1994<br />

from the Government of Jammu and Kashmir seeking<br />

sanction for prosecution from the Ministry of Home<br />

Affairs].<br />

The Jammu and Kashmir Police submitted a progress<br />

report before the High Court on 2 July 1996 wherein it<br />

was stated that Deputy Commandant D.S.Rathore<br />

had been interrogated. Further, that Head Constable<br />

Kartar Chand Raina and Head Constable Shoni Lal<br />

had accompanied the Deputy Commandant when<br />

arresting the victim.<br />

It appears that the contempt petition was dismissed in<br />

July 2004 as being infructuous as a chargesheet had<br />

been led against Azad Ahmad Mir. But, on 21 May<br />

2002, the Ministry of Home Affairs declined sanction<br />

for prosecution purely on the basis that a parallel<br />

court-martial process by the BSF had acquitted<br />

Deputy Commandant D.S. Rathore.<br />

On 20 November 1999, the family of the victim were<br />

awarded Rs.2,00,000 as compensation based on a<br />

suit led before the District Judge, Srinagar against<br />

the Union of India. The family of the victim appealed<br />

this order before the High Court as they had sought<br />

compensation of Rs. 40,00,000.<br />

It is noteworthy that the Government of Jammu and<br />

Kashmir took 11 years to investigate and process the<br />

case for acquiring sanction for prosecution under<br />

AFSPA, which apparently helped the perpetrators in<br />

evading justice.<br />

Even after the conrmation of the arrest and detention<br />

of Sajad Ahmad Bazaz by the judicial enquiry, and<br />

despite the passage of twenty years, no ofcial<br />

information exists on the alleged perpetrators being<br />

brought to justice. Further, it needs to be ascertained<br />

why all the alleged perpetrators were not proceeded<br />

against before a court, as it appears proceedings<br />

were only considered against Deputy Commandant<br />

D.S. Rathore and Azad Ahmad Mir.<br />

Finally, the manner in which the BSF used the courtmartial<br />

proceedings to subvert any hope of justice in<br />

this case is consistent with the all pervasive<br />

impunity in Jammu and Kashmir.<br />

Case No. 18<br />

Victim Details<br />

Ghulam Nabi Bhat [Enforced Disappearance]<br />

Age: 20<br />

Occupation: Tailor<br />

Son of: Ghulam Ahmad Bhat<br />

Resident of: Islamia Colony, Kani Dewar, Hawal,<br />

Srinagar<br />

Alleged Perpetrators<br />

Case No. 18<br />

Victim Details<br />

Ghulam Nabi Bhat [Enforced Disappearance]<br />

Age: 20<br />

Occupation: Tailor<br />

Son of: Ghulam Ahmad Bhat<br />

Resident of: Islamia Colony, Kani Dewar, Hawal,<br />

Srinagar<br />

Alleged Perpetrators<br />

th<br />

1. Constable Labhour Singh, 107 Battalion,<br />

Border Security Force [BSF], Camp Hawal<br />

26 th<br />

2. Guard Commander N.K. Raina , 107<br />

Battalion, Border Security Force [BSF],<br />

Camp Hawal<br />

Case Information<br />

On 8 June 1992, Ghulam Nabi Bhat was picked up by<br />

a BSF party at about 10:30 am. Mohammad Sharief<br />

Malik, a shopkeeper, was a witness to this abduction.<br />

26 Both the alleged perpetrators were reported killed subsequently in militancy related activity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!