04.10.2015 Views

STRUCTURES OF VIOLENCE

4cONo1kTN

4cONo1kTN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

203 | Structures of Violence<br />

perhaps listed as “Abdullah Rather”].<br />

The family of the victim did not receive any<br />

relief/compensation. The family heard that Major<br />

Bakali was killed in an encounter in 1997 at Khumriyal,<br />

Lolab.<br />

The family of the victim was also harassed subsequent<br />

to the abduction and disappearance of the victim. In<br />

1997, the victims brother – Ghulam Mohi-ud-din Bhat,<br />

and the victims wife – Saja, were travelling to the High<br />

Court, Srinagar, from Kupwara. The bus they were<br />

travelling in was stopped by the army personnel.<br />

Ghulam Mohi-ud-din was asked to show his identity<br />

card. They were then taken to the Cherkote army<br />

camp. At the camp, a Sikh Major asked Ghulam Mohiud-din<br />

about his brother Bashir and where the<br />

ammunition was. Ghulam Mohi-ud-din responded by<br />

stating that the army had his brother and where could<br />

he get ammunition from. Meanwhile, Saja returned to<br />

the village and informed people about what was<br />

happening. The villagers held a sit in at Cherkote and<br />

demanded Ghulam Mohi-ud-din's release. Then, a<br />

Brigadier from the Cherkote army camp intervened.<br />

He once again asked Ghulam Mohi-ud-din whether he<br />

had any ammunition of his brother. Ghulam Mohi-uddin<br />

stated that when his brother surrendered he<br />

handed over everything to Major Bakali. The Brigadier<br />

then called Major Bakali, who was then at Panzgam<br />

where the headquarters of 12 MLI was. After a<br />

conversation on the phone, Ghulam Mohi-ud-din was<br />

released. He had been detained for the whole day and<br />

only released at 5:00 p.m. Ghulam Mohi-ud-din states<br />

that on that day he was the only one to be arrested<br />

from the bus as he was pursuing the case of his<br />

brother. Ghulam Mohi-ud-din believes that there was a<br />

more sinister intention then just to harm him. He<br />

believes that because of the sit in and because of the<br />

intervention of the Brigadier, the Sikh Major had to<br />

make up a story of ammunition which was<br />

subsequently claried. Three to four months later,<br />

Major Bakali was transferred out of Kuligam camp.<br />

The family of the victim gave a statement to the IPTK<br />

on 13 November 2013.<br />

FIR no.38/1996 u/s 346 [Wrongful connement in<br />

secret] Ranbir Penal Code, 1989 [RPC] was led at the<br />

Lalpora Police Station on 12 March 1996. Information<br />

on this FIR was sought through the Jammu and<br />

Kashmir Right to Information Act, 2009 [RTI] on 15<br />

October 2013. By communication dated 25 April 2014<br />

from the Jammu and Kashmir Police a copy of the FIR<br />

and police correspondence was provided. Further<br />

information sought through RTI dated 14 November<br />

2014. By communication dated 10 December 2014 the<br />

police stated that investigations have not led<br />

anywhere and the case was closed on 13 December<br />

1997.<br />

The family of Bashir Ahmad Bhat led a petition<br />

before the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir<br />

[habeas corpus petition, Section 491 Criminal<br />

49<br />

Procedure Code, 1989 (CrPC) 134/1997] . The<br />

respondents to the petition, the Government of<br />

Jammu and Kashmir, Director General of Police<br />

[DGP], Jammu and Kashmir and Station House<br />

Ofcer [SHO], Lalpora Police Station, denied the<br />

arrest and custody of Bashir Ahmad Bhat. On 7<br />

December 1999 an enquiry was ordered, and was<br />

conducted by the Principal Sessions Judge,<br />

Kupwara. The judicial enquiry was concluded on 15<br />

May 2002. On 10 July 2003, the High Court directed<br />

the Senior Superintendent of Police [SSP], Kupwara<br />

to indicate the progress of investigations. On 28<br />

September 2004, despite the High Court noting that<br />

there had been no substantive progress in the<br />

investigations, the petition was dismissed with an<br />

order that investigations be expedited.<br />

The document on record that may be analysed in the<br />

instant case is the enquiry report of the Principal<br />

Sessions Judge, Kupwara.<br />

The enquiry report begins by stating that the Public<br />

Prosecutor led objections on behalf of the<br />

respondents and the Commanding Ofcer who<br />

headed the 12 MLI Army at the relevant time. It was<br />

stated in these objections that Bashir Ahmad Bhat was<br />

never apprehended by the State agencies or<br />

Commanding Ofcer, 12 MLI. Bashir Ahmad Bhat was<br />

a surrendered militant as per the record maintained by<br />

the Company and he had volunteered to work as a<br />

source for the army and on his instance one pistol with<br />

magazine and six live rounds of cartridge were<br />

recovered. The petitioner [father of Bashir Ahmad<br />

Bhat] in the case produced four witnesses, in addition<br />

to his own testimony. The relevant evidence is<br />

summarized as follows:<br />

- Jabar Khan, Chowkidar of the concerned<br />

area, stated that he saw the armed forces of 12<br />

MLI stationed at Mirgund, Kuligam, Lolab, while<br />

they were taking away Bashir Ahmad Bhat to the<br />

concerned camp. Major S. A. Bakali was incharge<br />

of the camp and his ofce was functioning in a<br />

private house belonging to one Mir Abdullah. On<br />

the following day, the witness accompanied the<br />

petitioner and others to the camp and requested to<br />

see Bashir Ahmad Bhat. They were “rebuffed” and<br />

sent back. Bashir Ahmad Bhat has not been since<br />

then.<br />

- Abdullah Rather, the headman of the village,<br />

stated that he had spotted the armed forces of 12<br />

MLI cordoning the house of the petitioner and then<br />

apprehending Bashir Ahmad Bhat. Bashir Ahmad<br />

Bhat was taken to the “camp located at Kuligam”.<br />

The witness accompanied others to the camp and<br />

asked for reasons of the arrest. They were<br />

directed to visit the camp on the next day. On the<br />

following day, on visiting the camp, they were not<br />

allowed to see Bashir Ahmad Bhat. But, they were<br />

49 Information on the petition number was sought through the Jammu and Kashmir Right to Information Act, 2009 [RTI] on 2 July 2012.<br />

Information was provided.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!