04.10.2015 Views

STRUCTURES OF VIOLENCE

4cONo1kTN

4cONo1kTN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

303| Structures of Violence<br />

provided that the case was transferred to Crime<br />

Branch, Jammu in 1995, “where from reportedly the<br />

case has been sent to Home Department for<br />

government sanction for launching prosecution<br />

against the accused”. Further, it was stated that a<br />

communication dated 25 April 2014 had been sent<br />

from Deputy Superintendent of Police [DSP],<br />

Kishtwar, to Senior Superintendent of Police [SSP],<br />

Crime Branch, Jammu, to furnish the case diary and<br />

chargesheet. On the issue of the present status of<br />

the case, it was stated that SSP, Crime Branch,<br />

Jammu by communication dated 25 April 2014 had<br />

intimated that the sanction was still awaited. By<br />

communication dated 6 february 2015 the status is<br />

the same – the le is lying with the Crime Branch.<br />

The Ministry of Defence, in its afdavit before the High<br />

Court of Jammu and Kashmir in 2009 on sanctions for<br />

prosecution under the Armed Forces (Jammu and<br />

Kashmir) Special Powers Act, 1990 [AFSPA], stated<br />

in relation to this case that the case was under<br />

consideration for the alleged perpetrators.<br />

The Government of Jammu and Kashmir, in response<br />

to information sought through the Jammu and<br />

Kashmir Right to Information Act, 2009 [RTI] on<br />

sanctions for prosecutions under AFSPA, stated on 6<br />

September 2011 in relation to this case that sanction<br />

was sought on 1 April 2010 and was awaited for the<br />

alleged perpetrators.<br />

It is noteworthy that it took the Jammu and Kashmir<br />

Police and Government of Jammu and Kashmir 17<br />

years to investigate and process the case for<br />

acquiring sanction for prosecution under AFSPA<br />

which apparently helped the perpetrators in evading<br />

justice.<br />

Further, for over two years, the Ministry of Defence<br />

has failed to take a decision on whether to grant<br />

sanction for prosecution under AFSPA for the<br />

alleged perpetrators. The available documents do<br />

not suggest that even a court-martial was<br />

conducted in this case by the army.<br />

Case No. 33<br />

Victim Details<br />

Reyaz Ahmad Bhat [Abduction, Torture and Extra-<br />

Judicial Killing (Custodial Killing)]<br />

Age: 21<br />

nd<br />

Occupation: 2 year Bachelor of Sciences student /<br />

Assistant at a private clinic for 29 days prior to being<br />

killed<br />

Son of: Mohammad Rajab Bhat<br />

Resident of: Iqbal Colony, Baramulla Town<br />

Alleged Perpetrators<br />

1. Major D.P.Singh [Operational name: Tiger],<br />

15 Punjab Regiment, Army, Camp Filtration<br />

Plant, Bagh-e-Islam<br />

Case Information<br />

On 24 November 1993 at around 1:00 pm Reyaz<br />

Ahmad Bhat was picked up by Major D.P.Singh<br />

travelling in a jeep with some other soldiers. Reyaz<br />

Ahmad Bhat was then taken to the Filtration Plant<br />

Camp, Bagh-e-Islam.<br />

On the following day, the father of Reyaz Ahmad Bhat<br />

went to the camp, police station and the ofce of the<br />

Deputy Commissioner [DC], Baramulla. This was<br />

because people in the area had heard cries of torture<br />

from the camp on the night of 24November 1993.<br />

On 25 November 1993, the head of the locality had<br />

met Major D.P.Singh who denied Reyaz Ahmad Bhat<br />

was with him.<br />

Reyaz Ahmad Bhat was killed during torture and his<br />

clothes had been found at a stream close to the<br />

Filtration Plant Camp. The family states that the DC,<br />

Baramulla persuaded the army to hand over the body<br />

to the Baramulla Police Station. The family of Reyaz<br />

Ahmad Bhat received the body on 26 November<br />

1993. The body bore severe torture marks. The<br />

stomach of the victim had been opened, lled with<br />

grass, and then stitched back.<br />

Four days after the killing of Reyaz Ahmad Bhat,<br />

Major D.P.Singh, an unidentied Colonel and others<br />

came to offer money to the family of the victim but this<br />

was refused.<br />

The family received Rs. 1,00,000 in ex-gratia<br />

government relief and compassionate employment<br />

under SRO-43 [Statutory Rules and Orders].<br />

The family of Reyaz Ahmad Bhat gave a statement to<br />

the IPTK on 30 December 2011.<br />

First Information Report [FIR] no. 361/1993 u/s 302<br />

[Murder], 342 [Wrongfully conning person] Ranbir<br />

Penal Code, 1989 [RPC] was led at the Baramulla<br />

Police Station. The 22 May 2012 communication from<br />

the Jammu and Kashmir Police stated that the case<br />

was under investigation. A separate RTI was led<br />

regarding all FIRs against State forces in Jammu and<br />

Kashmir. By communication dated 25 December<br />

2013 from the Jammu and Kashmir Police a copy of<br />

the FIR was provided and information that sanction for<br />

prosecution was awaited.<br />

A letter dated 24 June 1997 to the DC, Baramulla from<br />

the Senior Superintendent of Police [SSP],<br />

Baramulla, conrms that Reyaz Ahmad Bhat was not<br />

involved in any subversive activities. Previous to this<br />

communication, a letter dated 30 April 1997 from the<br />

SSP, Baramulla to the DC, Baramulla, refers to Reyaz<br />

Ahmad Bhat as “innocent” and strongly recommends<br />

that compassionate employment under SRO-43<br />

[Statutory Rules and Orders] be provided to his family.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!