STRUCTURES OF VIOLENCE
4cONo1kTN
4cONo1kTN
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
303| Structures of Violence<br />
provided that the case was transferred to Crime<br />
Branch, Jammu in 1995, “where from reportedly the<br />
case has been sent to Home Department for<br />
government sanction for launching prosecution<br />
against the accused”. Further, it was stated that a<br />
communication dated 25 April 2014 had been sent<br />
from Deputy Superintendent of Police [DSP],<br />
Kishtwar, to Senior Superintendent of Police [SSP],<br />
Crime Branch, Jammu, to furnish the case diary and<br />
chargesheet. On the issue of the present status of<br />
the case, it was stated that SSP, Crime Branch,<br />
Jammu by communication dated 25 April 2014 had<br />
intimated that the sanction was still awaited. By<br />
communication dated 6 february 2015 the status is<br />
the same – the le is lying with the Crime Branch.<br />
The Ministry of Defence, in its afdavit before the High<br />
Court of Jammu and Kashmir in 2009 on sanctions for<br />
prosecution under the Armed Forces (Jammu and<br />
Kashmir) Special Powers Act, 1990 [AFSPA], stated<br />
in relation to this case that the case was under<br />
consideration for the alleged perpetrators.<br />
The Government of Jammu and Kashmir, in response<br />
to information sought through the Jammu and<br />
Kashmir Right to Information Act, 2009 [RTI] on<br />
sanctions for prosecutions under AFSPA, stated on 6<br />
September 2011 in relation to this case that sanction<br />
was sought on 1 April 2010 and was awaited for the<br />
alleged perpetrators.<br />
It is noteworthy that it took the Jammu and Kashmir<br />
Police and Government of Jammu and Kashmir 17<br />
years to investigate and process the case for<br />
acquiring sanction for prosecution under AFSPA<br />
which apparently helped the perpetrators in evading<br />
justice.<br />
Further, for over two years, the Ministry of Defence<br />
has failed to take a decision on whether to grant<br />
sanction for prosecution under AFSPA for the<br />
alleged perpetrators. The available documents do<br />
not suggest that even a court-martial was<br />
conducted in this case by the army.<br />
Case No. 33<br />
Victim Details<br />
Reyaz Ahmad Bhat [Abduction, Torture and Extra-<br />
Judicial Killing (Custodial Killing)]<br />
Age: 21<br />
nd<br />
Occupation: 2 year Bachelor of Sciences student /<br />
Assistant at a private clinic for 29 days prior to being<br />
killed<br />
Son of: Mohammad Rajab Bhat<br />
Resident of: Iqbal Colony, Baramulla Town<br />
Alleged Perpetrators<br />
1. Major D.P.Singh [Operational name: Tiger],<br />
15 Punjab Regiment, Army, Camp Filtration<br />
Plant, Bagh-e-Islam<br />
Case Information<br />
On 24 November 1993 at around 1:00 pm Reyaz<br />
Ahmad Bhat was picked up by Major D.P.Singh<br />
travelling in a jeep with some other soldiers. Reyaz<br />
Ahmad Bhat was then taken to the Filtration Plant<br />
Camp, Bagh-e-Islam.<br />
On the following day, the father of Reyaz Ahmad Bhat<br />
went to the camp, police station and the ofce of the<br />
Deputy Commissioner [DC], Baramulla. This was<br />
because people in the area had heard cries of torture<br />
from the camp on the night of 24November 1993.<br />
On 25 November 1993, the head of the locality had<br />
met Major D.P.Singh who denied Reyaz Ahmad Bhat<br />
was with him.<br />
Reyaz Ahmad Bhat was killed during torture and his<br />
clothes had been found at a stream close to the<br />
Filtration Plant Camp. The family states that the DC,<br />
Baramulla persuaded the army to hand over the body<br />
to the Baramulla Police Station. The family of Reyaz<br />
Ahmad Bhat received the body on 26 November<br />
1993. The body bore severe torture marks. The<br />
stomach of the victim had been opened, lled with<br />
grass, and then stitched back.<br />
Four days after the killing of Reyaz Ahmad Bhat,<br />
Major D.P.Singh, an unidentied Colonel and others<br />
came to offer money to the family of the victim but this<br />
was refused.<br />
The family received Rs. 1,00,000 in ex-gratia<br />
government relief and compassionate employment<br />
under SRO-43 [Statutory Rules and Orders].<br />
The family of Reyaz Ahmad Bhat gave a statement to<br />
the IPTK on 30 December 2011.<br />
First Information Report [FIR] no. 361/1993 u/s 302<br />
[Murder], 342 [Wrongfully conning person] Ranbir<br />
Penal Code, 1989 [RPC] was led at the Baramulla<br />
Police Station. The 22 May 2012 communication from<br />
the Jammu and Kashmir Police stated that the case<br />
was under investigation. A separate RTI was led<br />
regarding all FIRs against State forces in Jammu and<br />
Kashmir. By communication dated 25 December<br />
2013 from the Jammu and Kashmir Police a copy of<br />
the FIR was provided and information that sanction for<br />
prosecution was awaited.<br />
A letter dated 24 June 1997 to the DC, Baramulla from<br />
the Senior Superintendent of Police [SSP],<br />
Baramulla, conrms that Reyaz Ahmad Bhat was not<br />
involved in any subversive activities. Previous to this<br />
communication, a letter dated 30 April 1997 from the<br />
SSP, Baramulla to the DC, Baramulla, refers to Reyaz<br />
Ahmad Bhat as “innocent” and strongly recommends<br />
that compassionate employment under SRO-43<br />
[Statutory Rules and Orders] be provided to his family.