04.10.2015 Views

STRUCTURES OF VIOLENCE

4cONo1kTN

4cONo1kTN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

210 | Structures of Violence<br />

[Numberdar, de facto revenue authority in the<br />

village], stated that following the Akbar's<br />

arrest in November 1996, he saw the victim at<br />

the Raj Ries army camp at Palhallan,<br />

Pattan. The witness testied that Major Sinah<br />

told him that the victim would be released<br />

provided he handed over a pistol. The<br />

witness than spoke to the victim and asked<br />

him to hand over the pistol. The victim denied<br />

having any pistol with him. The witness than<br />

stated that the army spread a rumour in the<br />

camp that the victim had escaped on 28<br />

November 1996.<br />

- Witness Abdul Gaffar Kochey [his relation to<br />

the victim or his position in general is not<br />

mentioned] stated that Akbar was not<br />

involved in any militancy activities. He<br />

testied that the victim was arrested on 28<br />

November 1996 by the Raj Ries at<br />

Palhallan, Pattan. The witness stated that<br />

Major Sinah permitted them to meet the<br />

victim in the camp in the evening of 28<br />

November 1996. Major Sinah said that had<br />

Akbar handed over the pistol he would have<br />

been released. The victim denied having a<br />

pistol. The victim has not been seen<br />

thereafter.<br />

- Witness Ghulam Mohi-ud-Din stated that in<br />

the evening of 28 November 1996 he was in<br />

the house of the victim. The army surrounded<br />

the house and Major Sinah was the ofcer<br />

who then took away Akbar.<br />

- Witness Mohammad Subhan Rather, father<br />

of Akbar, testied that on 28 November 1996,<br />

Major Sinah took away my son and since then<br />

he has not been seen.<br />

Before considering the conclusions of the Sessions<br />

Judge, a few comments may be made on the above<br />

testimony:<br />

- Witness Kamal-ud-Din's testimony conrmed<br />

th<br />

the arrest of Mohammad Akbar by the 8<br />

Battalion Raj Ries and Major Sinah. The<br />

witness is unclear on the specic date of the<br />

arrest [“November 1996”] and this might<br />

explain his placing the alleged escape of the<br />

victim on the 28 November 1996. The family<br />

of the victim places it on 30 November 1996,<br />

based on rumours they claimed were spread<br />

by the army.<br />

- Witness Abdul Gaffar Kochey's testimony<br />

strongly corroborates the above testimony.<br />

Further, his testimony also corroborates the<br />

family account of Mohammad Akbar that they<br />

met with the victim on the evening of his<br />

arrest.<br />

- Witness Ghulam Mohi-ud-Din's testimony is<br />

crucial as it corroborates Akbar's family<br />

version of events at their house on 28<br />

November 1996, and implicates the Major<br />

Sinah in the arrest of the victim.<br />

No evidence was brought in rebuttal by the<br />

respondents before the inquiry. The Sessions Judge,<br />

based on the above testimony conrmed the role of<br />

Major Sinah in the arrest of the victim and stated that<br />

th<br />

“it is therefore established that 8 Battalion of Raj<br />

Ries which was camped at Palhallan Pattan in<br />

November 1996 has arrested the said Mohammad<br />

th<br />

Akbar Rather and it is the 8 Battalion Raj Ries which<br />

has to account for his disappearance.”<br />

Therefore, in the instant case, the role of the army is<br />

clear. The specic ofcer involved is also clearly<br />

indicted by the inquiry.<br />

What is unfortunate therefore is that thirteen years<br />

following this inquiry, it appears no legal action has<br />

been taken against Major Sinah despite the High<br />

Court order that the investigations were to be<br />

completed in six months.<br />

The available documents do not suggest that even a<br />

Court-Martial was conducted in this case by the army.<br />

A barely legible letter dated 22 June 2009 from the<br />

Station House Ofcer [SHO], Pattan Police Station, to<br />

the Sub-Divisional Police Ofcer, Pattan, is also<br />

available. This letter appears to state that<br />

investigations conrmed the arrest of the victim by the<br />

army, camped at Palhallan, on 28 November 1996.<br />

Further, there appears to be a reference to Major<br />

Sinah as being the in-charge of the camp, but the copy<br />

of the letter available, being illegible, makes it difcult<br />

to be denite. The letter then goes on to state that the<br />

army was not cooperating with the investigation,<br />

which was therefore closed by declaring the<br />

perpetrators as untraced in 2005 but then reopened<br />

once again and is ongoing.<br />

Case No. 41<br />

Victim Details<br />

Muzamil Ahmad Chasoo [Enforced Disappearance]<br />

Age: 16<br />

Occupation: Working in a pharmaceutical agency and<br />

th<br />

a 9 Standard student<br />

Son of: Mohammad Sha Chasoo, Afroza<br />

Resident of: Dabtal Syed, Hamidpora, Nawa Bazar,<br />

Srinagar<br />

Alleged Perpetrators<br />

th<br />

1. Commandant, 9 Battalion Border Security<br />

Force [BSF], Camped at Mamta Hotel [as of<br />

February 1997]<br />

Case Information<br />

Muzamil Ahmad Chasoo was picked up by the<br />

th<br />

Commandant of the 9 Battalion BSF a year prior to<br />

the incident but was then released as there was no<br />

allegation against him.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!