08.02.2016 Views

22vPaX

22vPaX

22vPaX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

asia policy<br />

it rebalances to the region. This situation also raises concerns about the future<br />

direction of the U.S.-ROK alliance. More broadly, South Korea’s geostrategic<br />

trajectory could directly affect the balance of power in Asia. Whether South<br />

Korea inclines toward a rising China or stays anchored in the traditional<br />

alliance relationship with the United States, it could become a marker of Asia’s<br />

future direction.<br />

This essay first will examine each of the four dilemmas identified above<br />

and South Korea’s position in them to promote a better understanding of<br />

the current trends in PRC-ROK relations and the principles driving South<br />

Korea’s China strategy. It will then consider alternative arguments before<br />

concluding with a discussion of implications for regional relations and the<br />

U.S.-ROK alliance.<br />

south korea’s four strategic dilemmas<br />

There is a basic puzzle with regard to the South Korean view of China. On<br />

the one hand, South Korea views China as the second most favorable country<br />

among regional powers after the United States. 1 On the other hand, South<br />

Korea also views China as a major threat. These diverging views mark a clear<br />

departure from South Korea’s negative perception of China in the 1950–60s,<br />

when China was largely considered a Communist adversary during the<br />

Korean War and later North Korea’s staunch ally. Yet South Korea’s perception<br />

of China remains complex and ambiguous at best. This complexity is not<br />

just limited to public attitudes and perceptions but is also mirrored in the<br />

government’s foreign policy toward China. Although South Korea pursues<br />

close economic cooperation and a strategic partnership with China, it does<br />

so while hedging, if not balancing, against a rising China. How do we then<br />

unpack this exceedingly complex relationship?<br />

South Korea’s China policy has a tendency to vacillate because the<br />

country’s strategy toward China has been largely a combination of engagement<br />

and hedging. A primary driving force behind Seoul’s engagement with Beijing<br />

has been the need for Chinese cooperation on North Korea, combined with<br />

burgeoning economic ties. By contrast, other political and military issues and<br />

concerns make South Korea hedge against China. Of these considerations, the<br />

most pertinent is the fact that South Korea is a treaty ally of the United States,<br />

which places what one scholar calls “structural and perceptual limits” on its<br />

1 Jiyoon Kim, Karl Friedhoff, Chungku Kang, and Euicheol Lee, “South Korean Attitudes on China,”<br />

Asan Institute for Policy Studies, July 2014.<br />

[ 104 ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!