Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
asia policy<br />
to Southeast Asia and engaged there because the challenge to peace in the<br />
South China Sea is also a challenge to three key U.S. interests.<br />
The first and foremost reason the United States will remain invested<br />
in the peace and stability of Pacific Asia is economic. In 2014, U.S. exports<br />
to Asia had a total value of $650.5 billion, while imports from Asia were<br />
worth $1.06 trillion, accounting for a respective 27.7% and 37.2% of total<br />
U.S. exports and imports. 1 Further, investment by American entrepreneurs<br />
in Asian economies gives the United States a stake in the regular and<br />
uninterrupted conduct of intrastate and intraregional trade and in<br />
predictable and inclusive growth. A second national interest is the security<br />
of allies and friends. The pursuit of peace beyond U.S. shores is, in turn,<br />
the most effective guarantee that the continental homeland will never itself<br />
become a battlefield.<br />
Third, both of these core interests—prosperity and security—are<br />
underpinned by the traditional rights of states to sail unimpeded on the<br />
high seas and, without impairing the peace or security of coastal states,<br />
travel through territorial waters without prior permission. From its earliest<br />
days, the law of the sea has protected trading nations’ access to foreign<br />
ports. In the modern global economy, all nations are traders and enjoy<br />
in common the benefits of open access. Further, maritime power, which<br />
is reliant on mobility at sea, plays a unique and irreplaceable role in U.S.<br />
power-projection strategies, being both flexible and visible. U.S. fleets<br />
make neighbors of our distant allies, assuring them of the United States’<br />
commitment to their security. 2<br />
The U.S. Freedom of Navigation Program was established in response<br />
to the gradual erosion of traditional rights at sea. Rather than an attempt<br />
by the United States to claim special privileges, it was created in reaction<br />
to new claims to territorial zones that threatened to enclose the littoral<br />
space within a jumble of overlapping jurisdictions. 3 Announced in 1979<br />
by President Jimmy Carter and endorsed by President Ronald Reagan<br />
in the 1983 U.S. Oceans Policy, the Freedom of Navigation Program has<br />
provided the auspices for U.S. Navy vessels to sail and operate in waters<br />
1 “International Data: Table 2.3. U.S. International Trade in Goods by Area and Country, Not<br />
Seasonally Adjusted Detail,” Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce,<br />
September 17, 2015; and “International Data: Table 2.3. U.S. Trade in Services, by Country or<br />
Affiliation and by Type of Service,” Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce,<br />
October 15, 2015. Both sets of data are available at http://www.bea.gov/itable.<br />
2 Hedley Bull, “Sea Power and Political Influence,” Adelphi Papers 16, no. 122 (1976): 6.<br />
3 Elliot L. Richardson, “Power, Mobility and the Law of the Sea,” Foreign Affairs 58, no. 4 (1980): 904.<br />
[ 60 ]