08.02.2016 Views

22vPaX

22vPaX

22vPaX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

oundtable • non-claimant perspectives on the south china sea<br />

and operations.” 17 In addition, Indonesia is a target recipient country of the<br />

U.S.-funded Southeast Asia Maritime Security Initiative that was announced<br />

in 2015. Such U.S. assistance could help Indonesia develop its nascent coast<br />

guard agency to better patrol the country’s vast maritime swathes, including<br />

waters around the Natuna Islands. However, this development should not<br />

be interpreted as a sign of Indonesia’s alignment with the United States.<br />

If all things stay the same, Indonesia still wishes to see all major powers,<br />

especially the United States and China, keep each other in check. Thus, its<br />

interests continue to lie in preserving ASEAN unity and centrality against<br />

the domination of a single major power.<br />

Conclusion: Future Instability<br />

Without doubt, the most interesting question is what happens if all<br />

things fail to stay the same. In other words, what if the claimant states—and<br />

interested parties—engage in behaviors that make the South China Sea<br />

less stable and more prone to conflict? From the moment China revealed<br />

its U-shaped line at an Indonesia-facilitated workshop in 1993 until 2010,<br />

Indonesia could simultaneously both cultivate closer cooperation with<br />

China and reject the U-shaped line. This is the status quo Indonesia wishes<br />

to uphold.<br />

The strategic ambiguity that China carefully and masterfully<br />

maintained in the last two decades helped sustain this status quo. By<br />

keeping the U-shaped line from claiming the insular features of the Natuna<br />

Islands, China removed the most sensitive of Indonesia’s sovereignty<br />

concerns. It is becoming clearer, however, that China’s ambiguity is more<br />

declaratory than actual. Despite this vague stance on the potential overlap<br />

between the U-shaped line and Indonesia’s EEZ boundary, China’s behavior<br />

suggests that the line can stretch as far south as Beijing wants. Even if China<br />

were to decide to “compromise” and adjust the southern extremity of the<br />

U-shaped line to align with Indonesia’s EEZ boundary, Jakarta would still<br />

not accept such a move because of the intimidating and coercive nature via<br />

which Beijing enforces its claim vis-à-vis the ASEAN claimants, even apart<br />

from the illegality of the U-shaped line itself under UNCLOS.<br />

17 Kanupriya Kapoor and Randy Fabi, “Indonesia Eyes Regular Navy Exercises with U.S. in<br />

South China Sea,” Reuters, April 13, 2015 u http://in.reuters.com/article/indonesia-ussouthchinasea-idINKBN0N40NT20150413;<br />

and Brian Reynolds, “Submarine Group 7<br />

Strengthens Ties with the Indonesian Submarine Force,” Submarine Force Pacific, April 20,<br />

2015 u http://www.csp.navy.mil/Media/News-Articles/Display-News/Article/633587/<br />

submarine-group-7-strengthens-ties-with-the-indonesian-submarine-force.<br />

[ 27 ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!