ICON S Conference 17 – 19 June 2016 Humboldt University Berlin
160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME
160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Klaas Hendrik Eller: The Transpacific Partnership<br />
Agreement Through the Lens of Global Value<br />
Chains<br />
The TPP shifts the conventional paradigm of<br />
inter-state trade to a growing focus on Global Value<br />
Chains (GVC) as organizational form of contemporary<br />
production. The regional differentiation of trade<br />
and investment regimes is both a reaction to the<br />
existing fragmentation of production networks and<br />
a vital factor in expanding this trend. While GVCs remain<br />
highly sensitive to their regulatory environment,<br />
they are also a proper source of governance patterns<br />
which reflect the systemic nature of chain-wide<br />
coordination. This paper discusses how the novel<br />
administrative law architecture created by the TPP<br />
interacts with the private and hybrid infrastructure<br />
of contracts, standards and certification. Providing<br />
for mutual recognition of national standards, the TPP<br />
further blurs regulatory boundaries to create a space<br />
that is eminently preconfigured by chain governance<br />
instruments. Their justification becomes increasingly<br />
pressing, from the perspective of chain actors and<br />
third parties alike.<br />
economy and beyond. Spill-over effects seem likely<br />
due to the economies of scale generated by interoperability<br />
in the digital ream. The United States are likely<br />
to push for similar rules in the Transatlantic Trade and<br />
Investment Partnership (TTIP) with the EU to combat<br />
what it perceives as the current state of digital protectionism.<br />
Helen Churchman: The Limitations of Regulatory<br />
Convergence within Free-Trade Agreements<br />
This paper explores whether megaregional free<br />
trade agreements (FTAs) are a legitimate vehicle to<br />
achieve regulatory convergence or whether targeted<br />
multilateral negotiations would result in a more balanced<br />
outcome. I argue that this mechanism prevents<br />
substantive participation in the negotiation of new<br />
standards and regulations that will have a significant<br />
impact on countries and people across the globe, not<br />
just on TPP parties; that power dynamics and imbalances<br />
are more pronounced within smaller plurilateral<br />
negotiations, which can have a dramatic effect on the<br />
outcomes; and that trade offs that are made in other<br />
areas of the FTA negotiations may also affect the quality<br />
of the standards and regulations that form part of<br />
the final agreement. I also outline some of the practical<br />
limitations of regulatory convergence within FTAs,<br />
arguing that from a technical perspective, effective<br />
regulatory convergence can be hard to achieve within<br />
this framework.<br />
Thomas Streinz: The Trans-Pacific Partnership’s<br />
Innovative Framework for the Digital Economy<br />
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) reacts to the<br />
digital revolution and its implications for the global<br />
economy in the 21st century. Across the chapters on<br />
telecommunications, electronic commerce, and intellectual<br />
property, the TPP features innovative provisions<br />
on important and controversial issues such as<br />
Internet access, free data flows, data privacy, server<br />
location requirements, source code protection, domain-name<br />
dispute settlement, and the liability of<br />
intermediaries. Taken together, these provisions provide<br />
the basic framework for the TPP-area’s digital<br />
Concurring panels 100