09.06.2016 Views

ICON S Conference 17 – 19 June 2016 Humboldt University Berlin

160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME

160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Klaas Hendrik Eller: The Transpacific Partnership<br />

Agreement Through the Lens of Global Value<br />

Chains<br />

The TPP shifts the conventional paradigm of<br />

inter-state trade to a growing focus on Global Value<br />

Chains (GVC) as organizational form of contemporary<br />

production. The regional differentiation of trade<br />

and investment regimes is both a reaction to the<br />

existing fragmentation of production networks and<br />

a vital factor in expanding this trend. While GVCs remain<br />

highly sensitive to their regulatory environment,<br />

they are also a proper source of governance patterns<br />

which reflect the systemic nature of chain-wide<br />

coordination. This paper discusses how the novel<br />

administrative law architecture created by the TPP<br />

interacts with the private and hybrid infrastructure<br />

of contracts, standards and certification. Providing<br />

for mutual recognition of national standards, the TPP<br />

further blurs regulatory boundaries to create a space<br />

that is eminently preconfigured by chain governance<br />

instruments. Their justification becomes increasingly<br />

pressing, from the perspective of chain actors and<br />

third parties alike.<br />

economy and beyond. Spill-over effects seem likely<br />

due to the economies of scale generated by interoperability<br />

in the digital ream. The United States are likely<br />

to push for similar rules in the Transatlantic Trade and<br />

Investment Partnership (TTIP) with the EU to combat<br />

what it perceives as the current state of digital protectionism.<br />

Helen Churchman: The Limitations of Regulatory<br />

Convergence within Free-Trade Agreements<br />

This paper explores whether megaregional free<br />

trade agreements (FTAs) are a legitimate vehicle to<br />

achieve regulatory convergence or whether targeted<br />

multilateral negotiations would result in a more balanced<br />

outcome. I argue that this mechanism prevents<br />

substantive participation in the negotiation of new<br />

standards and regulations that will have a significant<br />

impact on countries and people across the globe, not<br />

just on TPP parties; that power dynamics and imbalances<br />

are more pronounced within smaller plurilateral<br />

negotiations, which can have a dramatic effect on the<br />

outcomes; and that trade offs that are made in other<br />

areas of the FTA negotiations may also affect the quality<br />

of the standards and regulations that form part of<br />

the final agreement. I also outline some of the practical<br />

limitations of regulatory convergence within FTAs,<br />

arguing that from a technical perspective, effective<br />

regulatory convergence can be hard to achieve within<br />

this framework.<br />

Thomas Streinz: The Trans-Pacific Partnership’s<br />

Innovative Framework for the Digital Economy<br />

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) reacts to the<br />

digital revolution and its implications for the global<br />

economy in the 21st century. Across the chapters on<br />

telecommunications, electronic commerce, and intellectual<br />

property, the TPP features innovative provisions<br />

on important and controversial issues such as<br />

Internet access, free data flows, data privacy, server<br />

location requirements, source code protection, domain-name<br />

dispute settlement, and the liability of<br />

intermediaries. Taken together, these provisions provide<br />

the basic framework for the TPP-area’s digital<br />

Concurring panels 100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!