ICON S Conference 17 – 19 June 2016 Humboldt University Berlin
160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME
160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ights theories which are at stake in international migration:<br />
(1) how rights relate to duties; (2) how the concept<br />
of a right depends upon its exercise; and (3) if certain<br />
rights entail other rights. This paper problematises<br />
the asymmetry and argues that one of the pioneering<br />
instantiations of individual rights in international law <strong>–</strong><br />
the ius emigrandi, enshrined in the treaties of Westphalia<br />
of 1648 <strong>–</strong> indeed suggests a correlation between<br />
the right to emigrate and a right to stay that has been<br />
forgotten. Although unexplored, this historical case<br />
seems to point to a practical, and hence theoretical,<br />
co-dependency between what I refer to as ‘twin rights’.<br />
Hence, I ask if this is a case of rights symmetry that has<br />
withered away with time.<br />
26 BUILDING BRIDGES: TOWARDS<br />
COHESION THROUGH A EUROPEAN<br />
UNIVERSITY SYSTEM<br />
<strong>University</strong> suggests the idea of an oasis of intellectual<br />
discovery or of learning laboratories that are welcoming<br />
and inclusive without borders. In U.S. there is a great<br />
debate about the role of <strong>University</strong> in forming a common<br />
identity: the panel will develop those suggestions<br />
in the European context. How much the administration<br />
and the law are allowed to intervene in the functioning<br />
of Universities to reach those goals of cohesion and<br />
international orientation?<br />
Participants Monica Delsignore<br />
Luca Galli<br />
Beatrice Rabai<br />
Antonia Baraggia<br />
Silvia Mirate<br />
Name of Chair Auretta Benedetti<br />
Room DOR24 1.502<br />
Concurring panels 56<br />
Monica Delsignore: At the borders of Universities:<br />
is there a global community?<br />
Universities have only begun to base admission<br />
on “merit” during the last 50 years. For most of their<br />
histories, they were exclusive, based on race, class<br />
and ethnicity. The exclusionary of the past left space<br />
to the inclusionary of the present, ensuring that each<br />
individual will have equal standing as a member of<br />
the <strong>University</strong> community. Nowadays Universities are<br />
international: they are linked across borders through a<br />
knowledge network, communicating worldwide. In the<br />
global framework, Universities should be in such a condition<br />
to develop their international orientation in a way<br />
that goes beyond the specificities of the State where<br />
they have been established. Indeed, each educational<br />
system is conceived in ideal connection to a presumed<br />
collectivity’s identity, which the public authority may<br />
wish to enhance or even to forge. This paper will reason<br />
on the role played by European and National law in the<br />
<strong>University</strong> system in building or demolishing borders.<br />
Luca Galli: The Erasmus Programme<br />
Border crossing, mobility, equality (but also diversity<br />
as a positive factor) are fundamental aspects of Erasmus<br />
Programme. Crafted by the EEC Council in <strong>19</strong>87,<br />
it has allowed more than 3 million students to spend<br />
an exchange period abroad, obtaining full recognition<br />
of the credits earned there, but also shaping a new<br />
kind of international mentality. The success of Erasmus<br />
is showed by the subsequent broader Erasmus Plus<br />
Programme, started in 2014, addressed not only to<br />
<strong>University</strong> students and not only to European countries.<br />
Public law plays a primary role for the mentioned success.<br />
How may Erasmus encourage States to adopt all<br />
the appropriate measures to remove legal obstacles<br />
to the Programme? Which is the role played by Uni-