ICON S Conference 17 – 19 June 2016 Humboldt University Berlin
160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME
160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 COPING WITH DIVERSITY <strong>–</strong><br />
PUBLIC POLICIES AND THE<br />
INTEGRATION OF INDIVIDUALS<br />
IN PLURALISTIC SOCIETIES<br />
The panel aims to illustrate the problems that face rule<br />
of law in pluralistic societies. Integration policies and<br />
the (moving) line defining the boundary between refugees<br />
and migrants must find their way through education<br />
for democracy and citizenship identity. Furthermore,<br />
the limits of state intervention must somehow<br />
admit autonomy of individuals and question the legitimacy<br />
of the protection of the individual from himself.<br />
Topics to be discussed: i) Faraway so close <strong>–</strong> crossborder<br />
migration in the Euro-region Galicia-North<br />
of Portugal and the unmet expectations of an easy<br />
socio-cultural integration ii) Refugees In, Migrants Out?<br />
iii) Democratic Standards for Education iv) Religious<br />
symbols, paternalism and protection of the individual<br />
from himself.<br />
Participants Patrícia P. Mendes Jerónimo<br />
Andreia Sofia Pinto Oliveira<br />
Benedita F. da Silva Mac Crorie<br />
Maria Luísa Alves da Silva Neto<br />
Teixeira Botelho<br />
Anabela de Fátima da Costa Leão<br />
Name of Chair Patrícia P. Mendes Jerónimo<br />
Room UL6 3071<br />
Maria Luísa Alves da Silva Neto Teixeira Botelho:<br />
Democratic Standards For Education<br />
The article discusses the nowadays importance<br />
of education for democracy and citizenship as a way<br />
of building or reinforcing a sense of belonging in a<br />
democratic and pluralist society. Legitimacy and constitutional<br />
identity are also addressed issues.<br />
Anabela de Fátima da Costa Leão and Benedita<br />
Ferreira da Silva Mac Crorie: Religious Symbols,<br />
Paternalism And Protection Of The Individual<br />
From Himself<br />
Although aiming to safeguard the autonomy of<br />
individuals, many of the bans imposed on the use of<br />
religious symbols in public spaces are based on paternalistic<br />
grounds, since the use of these symbols may<br />
reflect, many times, a deliberate choice. These bans<br />
seem, therefore, hardly compatible with autonomy itself,<br />
since autonomy should include the possibility of<br />
adopting a behavior that appears in the eyes of others<br />
as an option (a free exercise of choice) for inequality<br />
or exclusion. Thus, from an autonomy’s point of view,<br />
we intend to discuss the limits of state intervention<br />
and the legitimacy of the protection of the individual<br />
from himself, concerning the use of religious symbols.<br />
Patrícia Penélope Mendes Jerónimo: Faraway so<br />
close <strong>–</strong> cross-border migration in the euro-region<br />
galicia-north of Portugal and the unmet expectations<br />
of an easy socio-cultural integration<br />
Discussion of the cross-border migration in the<br />
Euro-region Galicia-North of Portugal against the<br />
background provided by a strong narrative of historical,<br />
cultural and linguistic ties, on the one hand, and<br />
the increasing reports of discrimination against Portuguese<br />
workers in Galicia, of their disenfranchisement<br />
in the political field and their exposition to a range<br />
of negative stereotypes that hinder their chances for<br />
integration.<br />
Andreia Sofia Pinto Oliveira and Benedita Ferreira<br />
da Silva Mac Crorie: Refugees In Migrants Out?<br />
The present refugee crisis has a reflex in migratory<br />
management policies. Given the high number of<br />
asylum seekers trying to access Europe, deportation<br />
policies regarding other migrants tend to be more severe.<br />
This is a good opportunity to re-think the concept<br />
of refugee of the Geneva Convention <strong>–</strong> with multiple<br />
interpretations <strong>–</strong> and the (moving) line defining the<br />
boundary between refugees and migrants.<br />
Concurring panels 30