09.06.2016 Views

ICON S Conference 17 – 19 June 2016 Humboldt University Berlin

160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME

160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

101 THE BLURRED BORDERS<br />

BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE<br />

Panel formed with individual proposals.<br />

Participants<br />

Name of Chair<br />

Room<br />

Barbara Boschetti<br />

Elisa D’Alterio<br />

Valbona Metaj<br />

Marko Turudić<br />

Ximena Sierra Camargo<br />

Jun Shimizu<br />

Elisa D’Alterio<br />

UL6 2249a<br />

Barbara Boschetti: Social clauses in public<br />

procurement and international agreements.<br />

New borders or just a more inclusive EU market?<br />

Barriers are raised anytime Member States’ authorities<br />

lay down special requirements/conditions into<br />

public procurement procedures aimed at ensuring the<br />

compliance with obligations in the different fields of<br />

environmental, social and labor law. Special clauses<br />

set barriers to market entry. The non-compliance with<br />

relevant obligations gives grounds for exclusion from<br />

the awarding procedure. When mirrored in contract<br />

clauses, the non- compliance could be considered to<br />

be grave misconduct on the part of the economic operator<br />

concerned. In recent decisions (ex multis, Regio-<br />

Post), the CJEU has minimized previous controversial<br />

judgments (Rüffert), allowing for a broader imposition<br />

of special conditions in public procurement covered<br />

by the EU rules. Special conditions find now new and<br />

wider legal basis, after the recent reform of EU Public<br />

Procurement law. Do public contracts contribute to a<br />

more inclusive society? Are special conditions in line<br />

with a EU without borders?<br />

Elisa D’Alterio: When the Uncertain Borders of<br />

the Public Sector Cause Inequalities: the Case<br />

of Hybrid Entities<br />

Over the past decade, we have witnessed an exponential<br />

growth of hybrid entities in all OECD countries,<br />

and even at the global level. At the same time, the<br />

mixed nature and the peculiarities of these entities may<br />

undermine the integrity of their governance, by facilitating<br />

the emergence of misbehaviors and conflicts of<br />

interest. This phenomenon is even more serious when<br />

we consider that many of these organizations deliver<br />

important public services, thus causing inequalities<br />

in the community damaged by the inefficiency of the<br />

“hybrid provider”. The main aim of this paper is to analyze<br />

how the “mixed legal regime” of hybrid entities can<br />

hinder or, more generally, affect the applicability of administrative<br />

guarantees (as transparency, participatory<br />

rights, publicity, non-discrimination, etc.). The analysis<br />

will consider not only domestic hybrid entities but also<br />

global bodies, in order to identify possible differences<br />

between the national and global levels.<br />

Valbona Metaj: Public-Private Partnership (PPP):<br />

Comparative Analysis of the Legal Framework in<br />

Albania and Italy<br />

The Public-Private Partnership (PPP) is becoming a<br />

successful factor in achieving economic development<br />

and good governance, by impacting positively both<br />

sectors. This paper will focus on a comparative review<br />

of the legal framework of the PPP’s and their use in<br />

practice, by analyzing the differences regarding governmental<br />

openness to those projects. The countries<br />

chosen for comparison are Albania as a “developing”<br />

country, for which the PPP’s constitutes an important<br />

link to the European integration, and Italy as a European<br />

country. In conclusion of this comparative analysis, it<br />

will be interesting to find out which one from these two<br />

countries with very different economic development is<br />

more favorable towards these partnerships.<br />

Marko Turudić: Public procurement-a tool for<br />

social integration and sustainable development?<br />

Public procurement procedures make up to 20 percent<br />

of GDP in the EU Member States, making the state<br />

perhaps the most important economic entity. However,<br />

the scope of public procurement may go beyond the<br />

economic benefits. The state, as the arguably largest<br />

economic entity in the country, has the right and<br />

responsibility to use its economic power to achieve<br />

additional social and environmental goals. Through<br />

public procurement, it is possible to encourage the employment<br />

of vulnerable and minority groups, to demand<br />

better working conditions for employees, but also to<br />

improve the environmental standards of a country. The<br />

last few public procurement regulatory frameworks<br />

of the European Union have been developing in this<br />

direction, mainly the regulatory framework of 2014. The<br />

subject of this paper is the analysis of public procurement<br />

procedures as a tool for achieving social and<br />

environmental objectives within the legal framework<br />

of the Republic of Croatia and the European Union.<br />

Ximena Sierra Camargo: Sovereignty, State and<br />

Global Governance: the transnational regulation<br />

of gold mining and the role of the Colombian<br />

Constitutional State<br />

In the context of a (neo) extractivism model, which<br />

has been reintroduced in last twenty years in several<br />

countries in Latin America, there is a growing presence<br />

of transnational mining companies, which have<br />

exercised their power through constitutional states,<br />

with the key collaboration of local governments.<br />

Namely in Colombia these actors have enacted and<br />

supported a large-scale gold mining regulation that<br />

reproduces a hegemonic discourse of development<br />

and which is mainly oriented to an economic growth<br />

but that ignores different views of development and<br />

ways of life. From a decolonial perspective this regulation<br />

is an expression of ‘coloniality of power’ because<br />

it maintains colonial hierarchies and reproduces some<br />

colonial legacies. In this way, I am discussing how the<br />

Concurring panels 147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!