ICON S Conference 17 – 19 June 2016 Humboldt University Berlin
160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME
160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
101 THE BLURRED BORDERS<br />
BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE<br />
Panel formed with individual proposals.<br />
Participants<br />
Name of Chair<br />
Room<br />
Barbara Boschetti<br />
Elisa D’Alterio<br />
Valbona Metaj<br />
Marko Turudić<br />
Ximena Sierra Camargo<br />
Jun Shimizu<br />
Elisa D’Alterio<br />
UL6 2249a<br />
Barbara Boschetti: Social clauses in public<br />
procurement and international agreements.<br />
New borders or just a more inclusive EU market?<br />
Barriers are raised anytime Member States’ authorities<br />
lay down special requirements/conditions into<br />
public procurement procedures aimed at ensuring the<br />
compliance with obligations in the different fields of<br />
environmental, social and labor law. Special clauses<br />
set barriers to market entry. The non-compliance with<br />
relevant obligations gives grounds for exclusion from<br />
the awarding procedure. When mirrored in contract<br />
clauses, the non- compliance could be considered to<br />
be grave misconduct on the part of the economic operator<br />
concerned. In recent decisions (ex multis, Regio-<br />
Post), the CJEU has minimized previous controversial<br />
judgments (Rüffert), allowing for a broader imposition<br />
of special conditions in public procurement covered<br />
by the EU rules. Special conditions find now new and<br />
wider legal basis, after the recent reform of EU Public<br />
Procurement law. Do public contracts contribute to a<br />
more inclusive society? Are special conditions in line<br />
with a EU without borders?<br />
Elisa D’Alterio: When the Uncertain Borders of<br />
the Public Sector Cause Inequalities: the Case<br />
of Hybrid Entities<br />
Over the past decade, we have witnessed an exponential<br />
growth of hybrid entities in all OECD countries,<br />
and even at the global level. At the same time, the<br />
mixed nature and the peculiarities of these entities may<br />
undermine the integrity of their governance, by facilitating<br />
the emergence of misbehaviors and conflicts of<br />
interest. This phenomenon is even more serious when<br />
we consider that many of these organizations deliver<br />
important public services, thus causing inequalities<br />
in the community damaged by the inefficiency of the<br />
“hybrid provider”. The main aim of this paper is to analyze<br />
how the “mixed legal regime” of hybrid entities can<br />
hinder or, more generally, affect the applicability of administrative<br />
guarantees (as transparency, participatory<br />
rights, publicity, non-discrimination, etc.). The analysis<br />
will consider not only domestic hybrid entities but also<br />
global bodies, in order to identify possible differences<br />
between the national and global levels.<br />
Valbona Metaj: Public-Private Partnership (PPP):<br />
Comparative Analysis of the Legal Framework in<br />
Albania and Italy<br />
The Public-Private Partnership (PPP) is becoming a<br />
successful factor in achieving economic development<br />
and good governance, by impacting positively both<br />
sectors. This paper will focus on a comparative review<br />
of the legal framework of the PPP’s and their use in<br />
practice, by analyzing the differences regarding governmental<br />
openness to those projects. The countries<br />
chosen for comparison are Albania as a “developing”<br />
country, for which the PPP’s constitutes an important<br />
link to the European integration, and Italy as a European<br />
country. In conclusion of this comparative analysis, it<br />
will be interesting to find out which one from these two<br />
countries with very different economic development is<br />
more favorable towards these partnerships.<br />
Marko Turudić: Public procurement-a tool for<br />
social integration and sustainable development?<br />
Public procurement procedures make up to 20 percent<br />
of GDP in the EU Member States, making the state<br />
perhaps the most important economic entity. However,<br />
the scope of public procurement may go beyond the<br />
economic benefits. The state, as the arguably largest<br />
economic entity in the country, has the right and<br />
responsibility to use its economic power to achieve<br />
additional social and environmental goals. Through<br />
public procurement, it is possible to encourage the employment<br />
of vulnerable and minority groups, to demand<br />
better working conditions for employees, but also to<br />
improve the environmental standards of a country. The<br />
last few public procurement regulatory frameworks<br />
of the European Union have been developing in this<br />
direction, mainly the regulatory framework of 2014. The<br />
subject of this paper is the analysis of public procurement<br />
procedures as a tool for achieving social and<br />
environmental objectives within the legal framework<br />
of the Republic of Croatia and the European Union.<br />
Ximena Sierra Camargo: Sovereignty, State and<br />
Global Governance: the transnational regulation<br />
of gold mining and the role of the Colombian<br />
Constitutional State<br />
In the context of a (neo) extractivism model, which<br />
has been reintroduced in last twenty years in several<br />
countries in Latin America, there is a growing presence<br />
of transnational mining companies, which have<br />
exercised their power through constitutional states,<br />
with the key collaboration of local governments.<br />
Namely in Colombia these actors have enacted and<br />
supported a large-scale gold mining regulation that<br />
reproduces a hegemonic discourse of development<br />
and which is mainly oriented to an economic growth<br />
but that ignores different views of development and<br />
ways of life. From a decolonial perspective this regulation<br />
is an expression of ‘coloniality of power’ because<br />
it maintains colonial hierarchies and reproduces some<br />
colonial legacies. In this way, I am discussing how the<br />
Concurring panels 147