ICON S Conference 17 – 19 June 2016 Humboldt University Berlin

Recommendations

Info

N Abhayraj Naik Azim Premji University Bangalore 91 Hans-Martien ten Napel Leiden University ○ Giulio Napolitano Roma Tre University 36 Yota Negishi Japan Society for the Promotion of Science / Max Planck Institute for Com parative Public and International Law Heidelberg / Waseda University Tokyo ○ Maddalena Neglia University College of London ○ Jaclyn Ling Chien Neo National University of Singapore 81, 153 Lorne Neudorf Thompson Rivers University Kamloops 83 Janne E. Nijman T.M.C. Asser Institute The Hague / University of Amsterdam 118 Georg Nolte Humboldt University Berlin 38, 135 Colm O’Cinneide University College London 162 Aoife O’Donoghue Durham University 73, 105, 154 O Jed Odermatt European University Institute Florence 35 Phoebe Okowa Queen Mary University of London ○ Zoran Oklopcic Carleton University Ottawa 171 Maria Carolina Olarte 123 Emanuela Orlando University of Sussex ○ Stefano Osella European University Institute Florence 155 Guillermo Otálora Lozano University of los Andes Colombia ○ P Octaviano Padovese de Arruda University of Hamburg 112 Ausra Padskocimaite Uppsala University 50 Tania Pagotto Ca’ Foscari University of Venice 45 Máté Paksy University of Liège 177 Jaana Palander University of Eastern Finland 87 Gianluigi Palombella University of Parma ○ Argyri Panezi European University Institute Florence 148 Marion Panizzon University of Bern 86 Participants Alessandra Paolini Sapienza University of Rome 128 Jonathan Parent Le Moyne College Syracuse 160 Davide Paris Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law Heidelberg 50 Óscar Parra-Vera University of Oxford 170 Reijer Passchier Leiden University 41 Andreas Paulus Justice of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany / University of Göttingen 38 Kyriaki Pavlidou University College London ○ Dejan Pavlović University of Belgrade 125 Mehrdad Payandeh Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf ○ Lucía Payero López University of Oviedo 70 Moria Paz Stanford University 94, 95, 122, 123, Franco Peirone University of Eastern Piedmont / University of Turin ○ Guilherme Peña de Moraes Fluminense Federal University Rio de Janeiro 103 Ricardo Pereira Cardiff University 44 Thomaz Pereira Getúlio Vargas Foundation Rio de Janeiro 80 Mauricio Pérez Externado University of Colombia 124 Ingolf Pernice Alexander von Humboldt-Institute for Internet and Society Berlin ○ Lourdes Peroni Ghent University ○ Almut Peters Humboldt University Berlin 78 Felix Petersen Humboldt University Berlin 93 Niels Petersen University of Münster ○ Bilyana Petkova European University Institute Florence 65, 166 Jan Petrov Masaryk University 49 Enrico Peuker Humboldt University Berlin 161 Gavin Phillipson Durham University 105 Meital Pinto Carmel Academic Center Haifa 47, 108 Andreia Sofia Pinto Oliveira University of Minho 30, 150 Flávia Cristina Piovesan Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo 169 196 Luís Miguel Poiares Pessoa Maduro European University Institute Florence 129 Gabriele Polewka Federal University of Paraná 79 Eszter Polgári Central European University Budapest 54 Oreste Pollicino Bocconi University Milan 130 Monika Polzin University of Augsburg ○ Sieglinde E. Pommer Harvard University 139 Patricia Popelier University of Antwerp 129 Assaf Porat IDC Herzliya 47 Iddo Porat College of Law and Business Tel Aviv 90, 132 Margherita Poto University of Turin 68 Anastasia Poulou European University Institute Florence 36 Catherine Powell Fordham University 146 Zoltán Pozsár-Szentmiklósy Eötvös Loránd University Budapest 145 Athanasios Psygkas University of Bristol 155 Dana Pugach Ono Academic College Tel Aviv 118 R Beatrice Rabai University of Milano-Bicocca 57 Gabriella Margherita Racca University of Turin 88 Danielle Hanna Rached University of São Paulo 172 Timo Rademacher University of Freiburg ○ Arkadiusz Radwan Allerhand Institute Krakow 48 Biancamaria Raganelli University of Rome Tor Vergata 116 Sabrina Ragone Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law Heidelberg 169 Guido Raimondi President of the European Court of Human Rights 14 Gonzalo Andrés Ramírez-Cleves Externado University of Colombia 91 Nicoletta Rangone LUMSA University Rome 58 Siina Raskulla University of Tampere 101 Zane Rasnaca European University Institute Florence 109 Amnon Reichman University of Haifa 102
Tilman Reinhardt Humboldt University Berlin 119 Géraldine Renaudière European University Institute Florence 151 Dominik Rennert Humboldt University Berlin ○ Eduardo Ribeiro Moreira Federal University of Rio de Janeiro 58 Clemens Rieder Lancaster University 163 Michael Riegner Humboldt University Berlin 63 Enrica Rigo Roma Tre University 55 Neliana Ramona Rodean University of Verona 64, 65 Mariana Rodrigues Canotilho University of Coimbra 150 Jorge Roa Roa Externado University of Colombia ○ Isobel Roele Queen Mary University of London 38 Emilia Roig DePaul University Chicago 62 Maria Romaniello IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca 144 Pier Marco Rosa Salva University of Udine 85 Matthias Roßbach Humboldt University Berlin 161 Elisabeth Roy Trudel Concordia University Montreal / University of Western Australia 117, 162 Yaniv Roznai Minerva Center for the Rule of Law under Extreme Conditions Haifa 41, 71, 168 Ruth Rubio-Marín European University Institute Florence 81, 155 Matthias Ruffert Humboldt University Berlin 32 Hélène Ruiz Fabri Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law 11, 40 Margaret M. Russell Santa Clara University ○ Johannes Rux Nomos ○ Emily Ryo University of Southern California 95 S Ilan Saban University of Haifa ○ Yair Sagy University of Haifa 102 Tehila Sagy University of Leicester 108 Elona Saliaj University of Tirana 83 Lorenzo Saltari University of Palermo 88 Participants Nahed Samour Humboldt University Berlin / University of Helsinki 63 Inger Johanne Sand University of Oslo 172 Erzsébet Sándor-Szalay National University of Public Service Budapest / Office of the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights Hungary 53 Philippe Sands University College London 10 Jenna Sapiano University of St Andrews 157 Isabelle Sauriol Bertrand, Deslauriers LLP Montreal 107 Mario Savino Tuscia University 84 Lucia Scaffardi University of Parma 175 Kim Lane Scheppele Princeton University 39, 104 Stephan Schill Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law Heidelberg 32 Stefan Schlegel Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity Göttingen 86, 87 Dana Schmalz Yeshiva University New York 119 Katharina Isabel Schmidt Yale University / Princeton University 124 Bas Schotel University of Amsterdam 115 Alex Schwartz Queen’s University Belfast 75 Angela Schwerdtfeger Humboldt University Berlin 74 Shuki Segev Bar-Ilan University 47 Joshua Segev Netanya Academic College 102, 103, 117 Guy Seidman IDC Herzliya 36, 47 Bianca Selejan-Guţan Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu 93 Nicola Selvaggi Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria 99 Jhuma Sen O.P. Jindal Global University Haryana 120, 121 Ayelet Shachar Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity Göttingen 11 Devendra Kumar Sharma Banaras Hindu University Varanasi 157 Omer Shatz Yale University 128 Jun Shimizu Sojo University Kumamoto 148 197 Yoon Jin Shin WZB Center for Global Constitutionalism 165 Adam Shinar IDC Herzliya 47, 158 Mira Siegelberg Princeton University 123 Ximena Sierra Camargo Del Rosario University Bogota 147 Davi Silva Federal University of Santa Catarina ○ Andrea Simoncini University of Florence 130 Pankaj Sinha Delhi High Court / People’s Action for Change & Empowerment (PACE) New Delhi 174 Fritz Siregar Indonesia Jentera School of Law 74 Alexandru Sitaru Dragos University of Bucharest ○ Izabela Skomerska-Muchowska University of Lodz 53 Lieneke Slingenberg VU University Amsterdam 115 Terry Smith DePaul University Chicago 34 Ülkü Sözen University of Hamburg ○ Ukri Soirila University of Helsinki 76 Iyiola Solanke University of Leeds 137 Ximena Soley Echeverría Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law Heidelberg 169 Hillel Sommer IDC Herzliya ○ Jiewuh Song Seoul National University 165 Anna Södersten Uppsala University 162, 163 Milka Sormunen University of Helsinki 177 Brian Soucek University of California, Davis 166 Giovanna Spanò University of Camerino 159 Aleta Sprague University of California, Los Angeles 136 Elisa Spiller Centre of Studies on Institutions Padova ○ Vladislav Starzhenetskiy National Research University Higher School of Economics Moscow 67 Dominik Steiger Free University Berlin ○ Maximilian Steinbeis Verfassungsblog 144 Talya Steiner Israel Democracy Institute 103 Charlotte Steinorth Central European University Budapest 101 Scott Stephenson University of Melbourne 27
Page 1 and 2:
ICON S Conference 17 - 19 June 201
Page 3 and 4:
ICON S Conference 17 - 19 June 201
Page 5 and 6:
ICON S Inaugural Governance The In
Page 7 and 8:
Saturday 18 June 2016 Sunday 19 Jun
Page 9 and 10:
EVENTs Plenary PLENARY Events 7
Page 11 and 12:
FRIDAY 17 JUNE 2016 → UL6 Audima
Page 13 and 14:
FRIDAY 17 JUNE 2016 → UL6 Audima
Page 15 and 16:
saturday 18 JUNE 2016 → UL6 Audi
Page 17 and 18:
concurring panels Concurring panels
Page 19 and 20:
Panels Session i FRIDAY, 17 JUNE 20
Page 21 and 22:
p. 61 30 RACIAL OTHERNESS IN EUROPE
Page 23 and 24:
p. 94 57 IRREGULAR IMMIGRANTS ACROS
Page 25 and 26:
p. 127 85 OTHERNESS IN PUBLIC LAW J
Page 27 and 28:
p. 160 112 REFUGEE PRIVILEGE OR HUM
Page 29 and 30:
1 CONSTITUTIONALISM AND CONSTITUTIO
Page 31 and 32:
3 FIGHT OVER THE TURKISH CONSTITUTI
Page 33 and 34:
5 REGIONAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL STRUC
Page 35 and 36:
7 COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON THE L
Page 37 and 38:
will demonstrate that OTC derivativ
Page 39 and 40:
conditionality is still driven only
Page 41 and 42:
mechanisms and practices of surveil
Page 43 and 44:
on the income and social benefits o
Page 45 and 46:
SATURDAY 18 JUNE 2016 9:00 - 10:45
Page 47 and 48:
17 WOMEN IN THE LAW Panel formed wi
Page 49 and 50:
19 WHO DRAWS THE BOUNDARIES? The Is
Page 51 and 52:
Constitutional Court, which engages
Page 53 and 54:
22 QUESTIONING HIERARCHICAL BOUNDAR
Page 55 and 56:
The paper strives to present the po
Page 57 and 58:
25 BORDERS & POPULATION DESIGN: TES
Page 59 and 60:
versities? Who are the national aut
Page 61 and 62:
28 COLLECTIVE MEMORY AND PUBLIC LAW
Page 63 and 64:
Germans from the East, large guest
Page 65 and 66:
ertheless, the introduction of this
Page 67 and 68:
Orla Lynskey: The free movement of
Page 69 and 70:
35 CONSTITUTIONALISM IN RUSSIA: COM
Page 71 and 72:
are viewed as “other” by one an
Page 73 and 74:
Matej Avbelj: On the Nature of EU C
Page 75 and 76:
Christopher Alexander Thomas: Avoid
Page 77 and 78:
ench. By so doing, the article atte
Page 79 and 80:
SATURDAY 18 JUNE 2016 11:30 am - 1:
Page 81 and 82:
44 CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION, DIA
Page 83 and 84:
Jaclyn Ling Chien Neo: Secular Cons
Page 85 and 86:
47 COMPARING LAW(S) AND INSTITUTION
Page 87 and 88:
49 SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOP- MENT
Page 89 and 90:
Johannes Eichenhofer: An alternativ
Page 91 and 92:
Stephanie Law: The Constitutionalis
Page 93 and 94:
offer an expansive protection of re
Page 95 and 96:
had inherited from its Socialist pa
Page 97 and 98:
Emily Ryo: Developing Legal Cynicis
Page 99 and 100:
59 HUMAN DIGNITY AND “OTHERNESS
Page 101 and 102:
explore the relation between securi
Page 103 and 104:
62 THE NEXT LEGAL FRONTIERS IN EURO
Page 105 and 106:
ies of government to limit and guid
Page 107 and 108:
Jochen von Bernstorff: Ironic Const
Page 109 and 110:
estricted to women, children and fa
Page 111 and 112:
the court characterizes proportiona
Page 113 and 114:
70 CONSTITUTIONAL IDENTITY IN TIMES
Page 115 and 116:
72 DIFFERENCE DISAGREEMENT AND THE
Page 117 and 118:
most important example is the Europ
Page 119 and 120:
Philipp Kastner and Elisabeth Roy T
Page 121 and 122:
Michèle Finck: The Right to the Ci
Page 123 and 124:
small number of Pakistani belies th
Page 125 and 126:
mark in the annals of international
Page 127 and 128:
ing attention in the constitutional
Page 129 and 130:
sity of private enforcement mechani
Page 131 and 132:
Federico Caporale: Water Grabbing:
Page 133 and 134:
88 THE INCLUSION OF “THE OTHER”
Page 135 and 136:
ment’s purpose in enacting partic
Page 137 and 138:
91 THE INTERNATIONAL RULE OF LAW -
Page 139 and 140:
93 JUDICIAL DIVERSITY: A COMPARATIV
Page 141 and 142:
95 LAW(S) OF REFUGEES II Panel form
Page 143 and 144:
are at stake, administrative courts
Page 145 and 146:
SUNDAY 19 JUNE 2016 9:00 - 10:45 am
Page 147 and 148: Zsuzsanna Gedeon: Constitutional co
Page 149 and 150: 101 THE BLURRED BORDERS BETWEEN PUB
Page 151 and 152: contractual governance, this can ha
Page 153 and 154: 104 RETHINKING SOCIAL INCLUSION WIT
Page 155 and 156: making, appearing to accord the pol
Page 157 and 158: is ambiguous. Some argue that globa
Page 159 and 160: 109 THE LAW(S) OF WAR Panel formed
Page 161 and 162: in cars in order to generate unreal
Page 163 and 164: lum fit uneasily with the transnati
Page 165 and 166: Clemens Rieder: Boundaries and Soli
Page 167 and 168: 116 THE RIGHT OF NON-CITIZENS TO CO
Page 169 and 170: 118 THE TRANSATLANTIC TRADE AND INV
Page 171 and 172: 120 OTHERNESS IN LATIN AMERICA: LEG
Page 173 and 174: Caitlin Goss: Constitutional drafti
Page 175 and 176: development of the political econom
Page 177 and 178: policy and legal framework around d
Page 179 and 180: Third, since the EU and the US have
Page 181 and 182: The ICON S Working Papers Conferenc
Page 183 and 184: Venue The 2016 ICON S Conference on
Page 185 and 186: Venues UL6 Unter den Linden 6 Main
Page 187 and 188: UL6 Unter den Linden 6 Main Buildin
Page 189 and 190: UL9 Unter den Linden 9 Law Faculty
Page 191 and 192: Floor 4 1.405 1.404 1.403 1.402 Flo
Page 193 and 194: A David Abraham University of Miami
Page 195 and 196: Pauline Endres de Oliveira Justus L
Page 197: Ingrid Leijten Leiden University 1
Page 201 and 202: Vanessa Wintermantel WZB Berlin Soc
Page 203 and 204: With the collaboration of Funded by
show all

ICON S Conference 17 – 19 June 2016 Humboldt University Berlin

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?