ICON S Conference 17 – 19 June 2016 Humboldt University Berlin

Recommendations

Info

BE2 Bebelplatz 2 Law Faculty Groundfloor E44/46 E42 foyer E34 way to UL9 UL9 to UL6 + DOR24 Floor 1 144 140 139A UL9 Floor 2 No <strong>Conference</strong> rooms on this floor. Floor 3 326 UL9 next floor Venues 186
UL9 Unter den Linden 9 Law Faculty BE2 Groundfloor way to BE2 E14 E23 E25 to UL6 + DOR24 Floor 1 No <strong>Conference</strong> rooms on this floor. BE2 Floor 2 210 213 Venues 187
Page 1 and 2:
ICON S Conference 17 - 19 June 201
Page 3 and 4:
ICON S Conference 17 - 19 June 201
Page 5 and 6:
ICON S Inaugural Governance The In
Page 7 and 8:
Saturday 18 June 2016 Sunday 19 Jun
Page 9 and 10:
EVENTs Plenary PLENARY Events 7
Page 11 and 12:
FRIDAY 17 JUNE 2016 → UL6 Audima
Page 13 and 14:
FRIDAY 17 JUNE 2016 → UL6 Audima
Page 15 and 16:
saturday 18 JUNE 2016 → UL6 Audi
Page 17 and 18:
concurring panels Concurring panels
Page 19 and 20:
Panels Session i FRIDAY, 17 JUNE 20
Page 21 and 22:
p. 61 30 RACIAL OTHERNESS IN EUROPE
Page 23 and 24:
p. 94 57 IRREGULAR IMMIGRANTS ACROS
Page 25 and 26:
p. 127 85 OTHERNESS IN PUBLIC LAW J
Page 27 and 28:
p. 160 112 REFUGEE PRIVILEGE OR HUM
Page 29 and 30:
1 CONSTITUTIONALISM AND CONSTITUTIO
Page 31 and 32:
3 FIGHT OVER THE TURKISH CONSTITUTI
Page 33 and 34:
5 REGIONAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL STRUC
Page 35 and 36:
7 COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON THE L
Page 37 and 38:
will demonstrate that OTC derivativ
Page 39 and 40:
conditionality is still driven only
Page 41 and 42:
mechanisms and practices of surveil
Page 43 and 44:
on the income and social benefits o
Page 45 and 46:
SATURDAY 18 JUNE 2016 9:00 - 10:45
Page 47 and 48:
17 WOMEN IN THE LAW Panel formed wi
Page 49 and 50:
19 WHO DRAWS THE BOUNDARIES? The Is
Page 51 and 52:
Constitutional Court, which engages
Page 53 and 54:
22 QUESTIONING HIERARCHICAL BOUNDAR
Page 55 and 56:
The paper strives to present the po
Page 57 and 58:
25 BORDERS & POPULATION DESIGN: TES
Page 59 and 60:
versities? Who are the national aut
Page 61 and 62:
28 COLLECTIVE MEMORY AND PUBLIC LAW
Page 63 and 64:
Germans from the East, large guest
Page 65 and 66:
ertheless, the introduction of this
Page 67 and 68:
Orla Lynskey: The free movement of
Page 69 and 70:
35 CONSTITUTIONALISM IN RUSSIA: COM
Page 71 and 72:
are viewed as “other” by one an
Page 73 and 74:
Matej Avbelj: On the Nature of EU C
Page 75 and 76:
Christopher Alexander Thomas: Avoid
Page 77 and 78:
ench. By so doing, the article atte
Page 79 and 80:
SATURDAY 18 JUNE 2016 11:30 am - 1:
Page 81 and 82:
44 CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION, DIA
Page 83 and 84:
Jaclyn Ling Chien Neo: Secular Cons
Page 85 and 86:
47 COMPARING LAW(S) AND INSTITUTION
Page 87 and 88:
49 SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOP- MENT
Page 89 and 90:
Johannes Eichenhofer: An alternativ
Page 91 and 92:
Stephanie Law: The Constitutionalis
Page 93 and 94:
offer an expansive protection of re
Page 95 and 96:
had inherited from its Socialist pa
Page 97 and 98:
Emily Ryo: Developing Legal Cynicis
Page 99 and 100:
59 HUMAN DIGNITY AND “OTHERNESS
Page 101 and 102:
explore the relation between securi
Page 103 and 104:
62 THE NEXT LEGAL FRONTIERS IN EURO
Page 105 and 106:
ies of government to limit and guid
Page 107 and 108:
Jochen von Bernstorff: Ironic Const
Page 109 and 110:
estricted to women, children and fa
Page 111 and 112:
the court characterizes proportiona
Page 113 and 114:
70 CONSTITUTIONAL IDENTITY IN TIMES
Page 115 and 116:
72 DIFFERENCE DISAGREEMENT AND THE
Page 117 and 118:
most important example is the Europ
Page 119 and 120:
Philipp Kastner and Elisabeth Roy T
Page 121 and 122:
Michèle Finck: The Right to the Ci
Page 123 and 124:
small number of Pakistani belies th
Page 125 and 126:
mark in the annals of international
Page 127 and 128:
ing attention in the constitutional
Page 129 and 130:
sity of private enforcement mechani
Page 131 and 132:
Federico Caporale: Water Grabbing:
Page 133 and 134:
88 THE INCLUSION OF “THE OTHER”
Page 135 and 136:
ment’s purpose in enacting partic
Page 137 and 138: 91 THE INTERNATIONAL RULE OF LAW -
Page 139 and 140: 93 JUDICIAL DIVERSITY: A COMPARATIV
Page 141 and 142: 95 LAW(S) OF REFUGEES II Panel form
Page 143 and 144: are at stake, administrative courts
Page 145 and 146: SUNDAY 19 JUNE 2016 9:00 - 10:45 am
Page 147 and 148: Zsuzsanna Gedeon: Constitutional co
Page 149 and 150: 101 THE BLURRED BORDERS BETWEEN PUB
Page 151 and 152: contractual governance, this can ha
Page 153 and 154: 104 RETHINKING SOCIAL INCLUSION WIT
Page 155 and 156: making, appearing to accord the pol
Page 157 and 158: is ambiguous. Some argue that globa
Page 159 and 160: 109 THE LAW(S) OF WAR Panel formed
Page 161 and 162: in cars in order to generate unreal
Page 163 and 164: lum fit uneasily with the transnati
Page 165 and 166: Clemens Rieder: Boundaries and Soli
Page 167 and 168: 116 THE RIGHT OF NON-CITIZENS TO CO
Page 169 and 170: 118 THE TRANSATLANTIC TRADE AND INV
Page 171 and 172: 120 OTHERNESS IN LATIN AMERICA: LEG
Page 173 and 174: Caitlin Goss: Constitutional drafti
Page 175 and 176: development of the political econom
Page 177 and 178: policy and legal framework around d
Page 179 and 180: Third, since the EU and the US have
Page 181 and 182: The ICON S Working Papers Conferenc
Page 183 and 184: Venue The 2016 ICON S Conference on
Page 185 and 186: Venues UL6 Unter den Linden 6 Main
Page 187: UL6 Unter den Linden 6 Main Buildin
Page 191 and 192: Floor 4 1.405 1.404 1.403 1.402 Flo
Page 193 and 194: A David Abraham University of Miami
Page 195 and 196: Pauline Endres de Oliveira Justus L
Page 197 and 198: Ingrid Leijten Leiden University 1
Page 199 and 200: Tilman Reinhardt Humboldt Universit
Page 201 and 202: Vanessa Wintermantel WZB Berlin Soc
Page 203 and 204: With the collaboration of Funded by
show all

ICON S Conference 17 – 19 June 2016 Humboldt University Berlin

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?