ICON S Conference 17 – 19 June 2016 Humboldt University Berlin
160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME
160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
91 THE INTERNATIONAL RULE OF LAW <strong>–</strong><br />
RISE OR DECLINE?<br />
The panel introduces the <strong>Berlin</strong> Potsdam Research<br />
Group “The International Rule of Law <strong>–</strong> Rise or Decline?”<br />
Certain developments in recent years give rise to the<br />
question how international law currently develops and<br />
performs its function. Whether we are seeing symptoms<br />
for a more significant “rise or decline” of international<br />
law is a question that underlies the research<br />
agenda of the group. Panelists will address select issues<br />
within this framework.<br />
Participants<br />
Name of Chair<br />
Room<br />
Pierre d’Argent<br />
Jutta Brunnée<br />
Heike Krieger<br />
Georg Nolte<br />
Heike Krieger<br />
BE2 E34<br />
Pierre d’Argent: Domestic democracy and<br />
normative differentiation as challenges for the<br />
international rule of law<br />
Two challenges <strong>–</strong> one external, one internal <strong>–</strong> to the<br />
international rule of law will be explored. The external<br />
challenge relates to domestic democracy: while international<br />
law was largely seen and used after World<br />
War II as a way to strengthen and promote domestic<br />
democracy through external control mechanisms, it is<br />
increasingly seen today as an impediment to popular<br />
choices expressed through democratic means. The<br />
internal challenge relates to international democracy:<br />
while the principle of equal sovereignty of States is<br />
essential to the legitimacy of the international legal<br />
order, the need to accommodate differences in capacities<br />
through normative differentiation tends to erode<br />
such legitimacy.<br />
Jutta Brunnée: Up to the Task? The International<br />
Rule of Law and Complex Problems<br />
International law is routinely called upon to grapple<br />
with environmental problems that are polycentric and<br />
multi-dimensional in nature, and resistant to permanent<br />
resolution. The rise of such complex environmental<br />
problems has coincided with a growing emphasis in<br />
international environmental law, both customary and<br />
treaty-based, on procedural rather than substantive<br />
requirements. Does this turn to procedure signal a<br />
decline in the global rule of law? Using climate change<br />
as an example, I argue that strong procedural requirements<br />
are crucial elements of the rule of law. In the<br />
context of complex problems like climate change, procedural<br />
requirements help provide a resilient and predictable<br />
framework for the long-term interaction that<br />
is inevitably needed in dealing with policy challenges<br />
that may not be amenable to solution on the basis of<br />
formally fixed substantive commitments.<br />
Heike Krieger: Consitutionalization in Crisis?<br />
Numerous developments and symptoms suggest<br />
that international law is currently undergoing a significant<br />
crisis. Here, the thesis on constitutionalization of international<br />
law could offer an answer as to how law might face<br />
and channel significant changes within the international<br />
order. However, this thesis is closely linked to the period<br />
of juridification in the <strong>19</strong>90s which fostered an optimistic<br />
perception of international legal developments. Can<br />
constitutionalism prevail as a dominant interpretative<br />
model under current circumstances? The paper analyses<br />
opposite trends which question the appropriateness<br />
of a constitutional reading of international law.<br />
Georg Nolte: The International Rule of Law <strong>–</strong><br />
Rise or Decline?<br />
Certain developments in recent years give rise to<br />
the question how international law currently develops<br />
and performs its function. Whether we are seeing<br />
symptoms for a more significant “rise or decline”<br />
of international law is a question that underlies the<br />
agenda of the <strong>Berlin</strong> Potsdam Research Group on<br />
“The International Rule of Law <strong>–</strong> Rise or Decline?” The<br />
pursuit of this question requires to clarify how “rise or<br />
decline” can be identified and assessed.<br />
Concurring panels 135