ICON S Conference 17 – 19 June 2016 Humboldt University Berlin
160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME
160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
70 CONSTITUTIONAL IDENTITY<br />
IN TIMES OF GLOBAL MIGRATION<br />
This panel seeks to address under what conditions, if<br />
any, could policies like public marking of immigrants,<br />
the seizure of their assets, closing of state borders, be<br />
justified? What sort of political demography would be<br />
in line with liberal-democratic understanding of constitutional<br />
identity? Is a nascent EU constitutional identity<br />
dissolving in the absence of a common politics towards<br />
the immigration crisis?<br />
Participants<br />
Name of Chair<br />
Room<br />
Miodrag Jovanović<br />
Vito Breda<br />
David Marrani<br />
Luis Ignacio Gordillo Pérez<br />
UL6 2070A<br />
outside cannot come in: the door is shut. It removes<br />
something or someone. Exclusion is a door that we<br />
close after sending people out. We remove someone<br />
we do not want to stay in the space. What condition<br />
the relationship between the two spaces is based on<br />
history and politics and regulated by law including<br />
constitution. The theme of exclusion in France is articulated<br />
around nationality citizenship and immigration.<br />
I will argue that the most effective exclusion is<br />
de facto exclusion and that using de jure exclusion is<br />
only a gimmick to satisfy the need of political control<br />
from an executive in end of reign.<br />
Miodrag Jovanović: Handling Massive Immigration<br />
Inflows: Between Liberal-Democratic<br />
Constitutional Identity and Illiberal Demographic<br />
Politics<br />
Rosenfeld’s liberal-democratic account of constitutional<br />
identity is premised on the idea of a moreless<br />
stable, even if heterogeneous, societal subject<br />
which is to be politically constituted. On this view,<br />
even the constitutional norms regarding citizenship,<br />
immigration and demographic politics count<br />
with predictable and manageable flows of people<br />
across the borders. However, how does this view of<br />
constitutional identity fare in times of massive global<br />
migrations, which has triggered across old and new<br />
liberal-democracies some highly challenging policies,<br />
such closing of state borders.<br />
Vito Breda: A Shrinking Vision for European<br />
Constitutional Identities: the Mass Exodus of<br />
Refugees, the Ginevra Convention, and a<br />
legitimation crisis<br />
In this paper, I will argue that some of the European<br />
constitutional ideals are obfuscated by what Habermas<br />
calls a legitimation crisis (<strong>19</strong>73). The European states’<br />
shared aspiration of being a model of a reasonably<br />
liberal democracy has been grinded away by a combination<br />
of fiscal policies which underpin an implausible<br />
welfare state, the rising of ethnocentric nationalism,<br />
and the lack of a communal European vision.<br />
David Marrani: The French Constitution “Post<br />
Terror” Attacks: The Return of the Old Ghost of<br />
de jure exclusion<br />
Exclusion may be a door between two spaces that<br />
opens from one space into the other in both directions.<br />
If we consider movement of population from one<br />
place to another, when the door is opened the event<br />
takes place. When it is closed the event is blocked and<br />
cannot happen. Exclusion forbids the entering and<br />
prevents the event from happening. Those who are<br />
Concurring panels 111