09.06.2016 Views

ICON S Conference 17 – 19 June 2016 Humboldt University Berlin

160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME

160606-ICON-S-PROGRAMME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

70 CONSTITUTIONAL IDENTITY<br />

IN TIMES OF GLOBAL MIGRATION<br />

This panel seeks to address under what conditions, if<br />

any, could policies like public marking of immigrants,<br />

the seizure of their assets, closing of state borders, be<br />

justified? What sort of political demography would be<br />

in line with liberal-democratic understanding of constitutional<br />

identity? Is a nascent EU constitutional identity<br />

dissolving in the absence of a common politics towards<br />

the immigration crisis?<br />

Participants<br />

Name of Chair<br />

Room<br />

Miodrag Jovanović<br />

Vito Breda<br />

David Marrani<br />

Luis Ignacio Gordillo Pérez<br />

UL6 2070A<br />

outside cannot come in: the door is shut. It removes<br />

something or someone. Exclusion is a door that we<br />

close after sending people out. We remove someone<br />

we do not want to stay in the space. What condition<br />

the relationship between the two spaces is based on<br />

history and politics and regulated by law including<br />

constitution. The theme of exclusion in France is articulated<br />

around nationality citizenship and immigration.<br />

I will argue that the most effective exclusion is<br />

de facto exclusion and that using de jure exclusion is<br />

only a gimmick to satisfy the need of political control<br />

from an executive in end of reign.<br />

Miodrag Jovanović: Handling Massive Immigration<br />

Inflows: Between Liberal-Democratic<br />

Constitutional Identity and Illiberal Demographic<br />

Politics<br />

Rosenfeld’s liberal-democratic account of constitutional<br />

identity is premised on the idea of a moreless<br />

stable, even if heterogeneous, societal subject<br />

which is to be politically constituted. On this view,<br />

even the constitutional norms regarding citizenship,<br />

immigration and demographic politics count<br />

with predictable and manageable flows of people<br />

across the borders. However, how does this view of<br />

constitutional identity fare in times of massive global<br />

migrations, which has triggered across old and new<br />

liberal-democracies some highly challenging policies,<br />

such closing of state borders.<br />

Vito Breda: A Shrinking Vision for European<br />

Constitutional Identities: the Mass Exodus of<br />

Refugees, the Ginevra Convention, and a<br />

legitimation crisis<br />

In this paper, I will argue that some of the European<br />

constitutional ideals are obfuscated by what Habermas<br />

calls a legitimation crisis (<strong>19</strong>73). The European states’<br />

shared aspiration of being a model of a reasonably<br />

liberal democracy has been grinded away by a combination<br />

of fiscal policies which underpin an implausible<br />

welfare state, the rising of ethnocentric nationalism,<br />

and the lack of a communal European vision.<br />

David Marrani: The French Constitution “Post<br />

Terror” Attacks: The Return of the Old Ghost of<br />

de jure exclusion<br />

Exclusion may be a door between two spaces that<br />

opens from one space into the other in both directions.<br />

If we consider movement of population from one<br />

place to another, when the door is opened the event<br />

takes place. When it is closed the event is blocked and<br />

cannot happen. Exclusion forbids the entering and<br />

prevents the event from happening. Those who are<br />

Concurring panels 111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!