14.12.2012 Views

The Context of HIV Risk Among Drug Users and Their Sexual Partners

The Context of HIV Risk Among Drug Users and Their Sexual Partners

The Context of HIV Risk Among Drug Users and Their Sexual Partners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Using the same interview questions as the Chicago MACS, but<br />

employing a r<strong>and</strong>om household survey <strong>of</strong> unmarried males living in the<br />

San Francisco neighborhoods with the highest rates <strong>of</strong> reported AIDS<br />

cases, Stall <strong>and</strong> Wiley (1988) reported on the NMPD use patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

1,034 men aged 25 to 54, <strong>of</strong> whom 286 said they were exclusively<br />

heterosexual <strong>and</strong> 748 were gay or bisexual. Using a somewhat different<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> heavy drinking (5 or more drinks on 2 or more nights per<br />

week), the San Francisco Men’s Health Study (SFMHS) sample had rates<br />

<strong>of</strong> 19 percent <strong>and</strong> 11 percent heavy drinkers among the gay/bisexual <strong>and</strong><br />

heterosexual subsamples, respectively, compared to rates <strong>of</strong> 28 percent<br />

<strong>and</strong> 19 percent at the first two baseline assessments <strong>of</strong> the gay/bisexual<br />

men in the Chicago MACS/CCS. Except for the oldest group<br />

(45 to 54 years) in the SFMHS sample, gay/bisexual men did not differ<br />

from heterosexual men in terms <strong>of</strong> alcohol use patterns.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> NMPD use prevalence, however, the SFMHS data for<br />

gay/bisexual men is similar to what was found in the Chicago<br />

MACS/CCS at baseline <strong>and</strong> significantly higher than in the San Francisco<br />

heterosexual male subgroup. Stall <strong>and</strong> Wiley (1988) reported 25 percent<br />

<strong>and</strong> 18 percent prevalence use rates for downers <strong>and</strong> hallucinogens in<br />

their gay/bisexual sample, which compares to the 19 percent <strong>and</strong><br />

18 percent rates in the Chicago cohort <strong>and</strong> 9 percent <strong>and</strong> 12 percent rates<br />

for downers <strong>and</strong> hallucinogen use by the San Francisco heterosexual male<br />

sample. <strong>The</strong> SFMHS gay/bisexual subgroup did report somewhat higher<br />

baseline rates <strong>of</strong> reported use <strong>of</strong> cocaine (52 percent), opiates (4 percent),<br />

<strong>and</strong> uppers (28 percent) than did the Chicago sample. Conversely,<br />

popper use was reported by 58 percent <strong>of</strong> SFMHS respondents <strong>and</strong> MDA<br />

use by 9 percent, compared to initial rates <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> 71 percent <strong>and</strong><br />

15 percent, respectively, by the Chicago MACS/CCS sample.<br />

<strong>The</strong> third relevant sample is the diverse community-based sample <strong>of</strong><br />

746 New York City (NYC) gay/bisexual men recruited by Martin <strong>and</strong><br />

Dean in early 1985 (Martin et al. 1989). In three yearly interviews <strong>of</strong><br />

their cohort, the investigators determined both prevalence <strong>of</strong> NMPD use<br />

<strong>and</strong> alcohol abuse/dependence disorder. <strong>The</strong>y reported a 12 percent rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> alcohol abuse or dependence in 1986, which dropped to 9 percent in<br />

1987. In terms <strong>of</strong> NMPD use, Martin <strong>and</strong> Dean’s NYC cohort appears<br />

similar to the Chicago MACS/CCS cohort during the period 1984-1987,<br />

with the exception <strong>of</strong> inhaled nitrites, which were reportedly used by<br />

45 percent <strong>of</strong> the NYC cohort in 1984/1985 <strong>and</strong> approximately<br />

25 percent <strong>of</strong> the men in 1986/1987.<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!