14.12.2012 Views

The Context of HIV Risk Among Drug Users and Their Sexual Partners

The Context of HIV Risk Among Drug Users and Their Sexual Partners

The Context of HIV Risk Among Drug Users and Their Sexual Partners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Edinburgh study found greater percentages—13 <strong>of</strong> 110<br />

(11.8 percent)—<strong>and</strong> reported that female sex workers (28 <strong>of</strong> 101, or<br />

27.7 percent) were more likely to be IDUs than males.<br />

TWO STUDIES CONDUCTED IN SAN FRANCISCO<br />

During the period from 1987 through 1991, two different studies <strong>of</strong> male<br />

sex workers were undertaken in San Francisco. <strong>The</strong> first study, from<br />

1987 to 1988, interviewed 360 male sex workers. <strong>The</strong> study was funded<br />

by the National Institute on <strong>Drug</strong> Abuse (NIDA) <strong>and</strong> focused on injection<br />

drug use <strong>and</strong> syringe-sharing practices. <strong>The</strong> second study was undertaken<br />

between 1989 <strong>and</strong> 1991 <strong>and</strong> interviewed 552 male sex workers. This<br />

study was funded by the National Institute <strong>of</strong> Child Health <strong>and</strong> Human<br />

Development. <strong>The</strong> study focused primarily on condom use but did ask<br />

questions about drug use as well. Neither study sample was r<strong>and</strong>om, as<br />

there was not enough information available to use such sampling<br />

methods. Both studies did, however, attempt to include substantial<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> all the major types <strong>and</strong> subtypes <strong>of</strong> sex workers. It should be<br />

noted that these are the largest samples ever done <strong>of</strong> male sex workers.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sampling methodology for the two studies was similar. <strong>The</strong><br />

existence <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> male sex workers was established from<br />

ethnographic studies conducted earlier by one <strong>of</strong> the project staff, <strong>and</strong><br />

interview quotas were established for each type <strong>of</strong> sex worker. <strong>The</strong> first<br />

study identified two general types <strong>of</strong> sex workers <strong>and</strong> seven subtypes.’<br />

<strong>The</strong> two general types were hustlers <strong>and</strong> call men. <strong>The</strong> first type,<br />

hustlers, solicited clients face-to-face, most <strong>of</strong>ten in public places-on the<br />

streets, in bars, <strong>and</strong> at sex magazine <strong>and</strong> paraphernalia shops. <strong>The</strong> second<br />

type solicited clients most <strong>of</strong>ten over the telephone; this group is known<br />

as call men.<br />

<strong>Among</strong> hustlers or workers who solicit clients face-to-face in public<br />

places, there are three subtypes: gay-identified youth, trade hustlers, <strong>and</strong><br />

drag queen hustlers.<br />

Gay-identified youth are young, gay-identified males who present<br />

themselves as being innocent <strong>and</strong> naive in the ways <strong>of</strong> the world but who<br />

participate in a wide spectrum <strong>of</strong> sexual activities. A substantial number<br />

<strong>of</strong> this group are juvenile runaways who generally present themselves as<br />

being adults when confronted by authorities.<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!