14.12.2012 Views

The Context of HIV Risk Among Drug Users and Their Sexual Partners

The Context of HIV Risk Among Drug Users and Their Sexual Partners

The Context of HIV Risk Among Drug Users and Their Sexual Partners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

may regard a refusal to share a syringe as a sign <strong>of</strong> mistrust. On the other<br />

h<strong>and</strong>, familiarity might enable drug injectors to be assertive about proper<br />

needle hygiene. An individual’s position relative to the other people with<br />

whom they are engaging in sex or drug use may also determine whether<br />

they engage in risky activity. For example, a woman who is dependent<br />

upon a male injector for access to drugs may be limited in her ability to<br />

negotiate for safer drug use or the use <strong>of</strong> condoms (Guydish et al. 1991).<br />

Non-drug-using members <strong>of</strong> a drug user’s personal network also may<br />

influence drug-using behavior. For example, in San Juan, Puerto Rico,<br />

IDUs who live with their families <strong>of</strong>ten frequent shooting galleries, where<br />

high-risk drug use is common, in order to keep their drug use hidden<br />

(Ann Finlinson, personal communication, May 2, 1994). This pattern is<br />

common among injectors in Denver as well. However, among some<br />

Denver injectors, an opposite trend is apparent. Some IDUs are able to<br />

use drugs in their own homes because their families support them <strong>and</strong><br />

tolerate their drug use.<br />

<strong>The</strong> specific setting in which drugs are used has been shown to play an<br />

important role in influencing drug-using behavior. Researchers in several<br />

cities have described the relationship between type <strong>of</strong> injecting location<br />

<strong>and</strong> the drug-using behavioral complex that occurs there (Carlson et al. in<br />

press; Clatts et al. in press; Des Jarlais <strong>and</strong> Friedman 1990; Oulette et al.<br />

1991; Watters 1989). <strong>The</strong> shooting galleries <strong>and</strong> “get <strong>of</strong>fs” (locally<br />

known places injectors go to use drugs) that they describe vary in size,<br />

organization, <strong>and</strong> function, <strong>and</strong> include establishments that service over<br />

100 injectors a day as well as apartments or hotel rooms that are used<br />

only by members <strong>of</strong> a closed drug-injecting network. Some shooting<br />

galleries have tightly enforced rules governing injecting behavior; others<br />

have no rules at all. Some <strong>of</strong> these establishments’ customers include<br />

both crack smokers <strong>and</strong> injectors, some allow sexual barter to occur, <strong>and</strong><br />

some facilitate completely anonymous syringe sharing.<br />

In Denver, drug injection occurs in a variety <strong>of</strong> settings, from relatively<br />

small organized galleries to ab<strong>and</strong>oned buildings, private homes, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

backseats <strong>of</strong> automobiles. Each <strong>of</strong> these locations presents the injector<br />

with certain conditions that may affect drug injection hygiene. For<br />

example, the number <strong>of</strong> participants <strong>and</strong> their familiarity will vary with<br />

the setting. Necessary ingredients like clean water may or may not be<br />

present. Privacy for injection may be <strong>of</strong> particularly brief duration. IDUs<br />

who inject in public areas, behind buildings, or in automobiles must do so<br />

quickly if they are to avoid detection. As a result, the procedure is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!