14.12.2012 Views

The Context of HIV Risk Among Drug Users and Their Sexual Partners

The Context of HIV Risk Among Drug Users and Their Sexual Partners

The Context of HIV Risk Among Drug Users and Their Sexual Partners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

along with discussion <strong>of</strong> some technical <strong>and</strong> statistical difficulties in<br />

conducting research (<strong>and</strong> by extension, intervention programs) that is<br />

more sensitive <strong>and</strong> specific to people in their settings. Like the ecological<br />

model, other research models need to become multidimensional <strong>and</strong> to<br />

incorporate indicators <strong>and</strong> measures across different strata <strong>of</strong> social<br />

complexity.<br />

<strong>The</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> serendipity referred to above has application to contextual<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> the study mode itself. <strong>The</strong> interview process itself may (<strong>and</strong><br />

does) have an effect. When both groups have had before-<strong>and</strong>-after<br />

interviews, this serendipitous effect could work to restrict the differences<br />

that are observed between experimental <strong>and</strong> control groups in<br />

intervention studies <strong>and</strong> between alternative intervention strategies.<br />

Whether or not this effect is a variation <strong>of</strong> the Hawthorne effect<br />

(Roethlisberger <strong>and</strong> Dickson 1939) <strong>of</strong> test-retest, it does suggest the need<br />

to modify the study design. <strong>The</strong> study could be modified by adding<br />

another group to be interviewed only at followup (carefully matched to<br />

the before-<strong>and</strong>-after experimental <strong>and</strong> control groups) or by statistically<br />

matching the results for the control <strong>and</strong> experimental groups with data<br />

obtained in the same period from equivalent populations outside <strong>of</strong> the<br />

study. <strong>The</strong>se supplementary data could be used to estimate how much <strong>of</strong><br />

an intervention effect being interviewed <strong>and</strong> being part <strong>of</strong> a study group<br />

comprises in <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> itself.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Aquilino, W.S., <strong>and</strong> LoSciuto, L.A. Effects <strong>of</strong> interview mode on selfreported<br />

drug use. Pub Opin Quart 54:362-395, 1990.<br />

Becker, M.H. A medical sociologist looks at health promotion. J Health<br />

Soc Behav 34:1-6, 1993.<br />

Bronfenbrenner, U. <strong>The</strong> Ecology <strong>of</strong> Human Development. Cambridge,<br />

MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.<br />

Brunswick, A.F. Impairment, disability <strong>and</strong>/or h<strong>and</strong>icap: An ecological<br />

paradigm. J Adolesc Health Care 6(2):141-151, 1985.<br />

Brunswick, A.F. Health <strong>and</strong> substance use behavior: <strong>The</strong> Longitudinal<br />

Harlem Health Study. J Addict Dis 11:119-137, 1991.<br />

Brunswick, A.F.; Aidala, A.; Dobkin, J.; Howard, J.; Titus, S.P.; <strong>and</strong><br />

Banaszak-Holl, J. <strong>HIV</strong>-1 seroprevalence <strong>and</strong> risk behaviors in an<br />

African American community cohort. Am J Public Health 83:1390-<br />

1394, 1993.<br />

199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!