St Mary Redcliffe Project 450 RIBA 2 Stage End Report

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SOUTH CHURCHYARD Mown paths/ margins through wildower meadow Extensive green roofs - providing opportunities for wildlife Maintaining and enhancing the peace and tranquility of the space Retention/ restoration of historic stone paving Seamless transition between outside and inside. Nature/ planting to the windowpane Cool verdant planting - enhancing calmness
C O L S T O N P A R A D E Illustrative Landscape Masterplan R E D C L I F F E W A Y coach/ DDA drop-off The adjacent site-wide Illustrative Landscape Masterplan is intended to capture the concepts and ideas idened in this Stage 2 report and provide the staging point for developing detailed design proposals as part of Stage 3. seating/ foils planting/ bleachers IDENTIFIED RISKS water feature paved plaza Entrance Podium cafe spill-out green roof The following key risks/ uncertainties have been identied, these will need to be examined in detail as a priority going forward on to Stage 3: • Tree Removals: in order to construct the building in the south courtyard, a number of trees will need to be removed. Whilst the majority of these are considered low-value, it does include a mature lime tree (T5) which could possibly be contentious as it is a prominant tree in the streetscape. The same tree has also been identied as having bat roost potential (BRP) and will likely require further ecological investigation. The proposed design for the use of screw piles (or similar) will need to be developed in order to provide assurances that the mature existing trees can be retained in such close proximity to the new building. R E D C L I F F H I L L cross exg. paving retained St Mary Redcliffe Church meadow & scattered trees green roof DDA parking PUMP LANE exg. trees retained • Existing Sewer: the implications of building/ planting on top of the existing sewer that runs east-west across the North courtyard will need to be assessed in more detail. It may be that there are restrictions on tree planting within the sewer easement which could necessitate use of raised planters etc as an alternative. • Coach/ DDA drop-off/ parking: a transport study is required to assess the feasibility of positioning a new coach/ DDA drop-off layby on Redcliffe Way. The proposed design reduces the quantum of disabled/ staff parking and will look to prevent ad-hoc parking in the south churchyard. The implications of this with regards to staff and congregation etc will need careful consideration. • Service yard/ deliveries: the site provides limited opportunity for ‘back of house’/ servicing areas to allow for deliveries/ refuse pick-up etc. Detailed consideration is required to understand whether these items can be accommodated in the current design. • Substation: It looks likely that a substation will be required to provide the necessary power for the new buildings. The siting of this structure will need sensitive consideration. • Stakeholder Buy-in: As yet, details of the proposed landscape have been very limited, and as such have not been reviewed by stakeholders. South Churchyard • Redcliff Way Masterplan: Unknown future context - Bristol City Councils proposals for Redcliffe Way and Redcliff Hill are currently under development. Therefore the treatment of the northern boundary (within the Churches ownership) needs to mitigate the current situation, as best it can. yard entrance forecourt NORTH
Page 1 and 2: ST MARY REDCLIFFE PROJECT 450 RIBA
Page 3 and 4: CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT TEAM 2.0 INTRO
Page 5 and 6: 2.0 INTRODUCTION Funded jointly by
Page 7 and 8: Project 450 Board Review Instructio
Page 9 and 10: 4.1 STRUCTURES Undertaken by Integr
Page 11 and 12: s dopted e, whilst A full CCTV surv
Page 13 and 14: 3.2 Existing Trees There are a larg
Page 15 and 16: Stability can be provided by reinfo
Page 17 and 18: 1563.R1 - Stage 2 report Page 5 of
Page 19 and 20: LEGEND 40-60 W/m 2 HEAT GAINS - NAT
Page 21 and 22: LEGEND 40-60 W/m 2 HEAT GAINS - NAT
Page 24 and 25: 4.3 LANDSCAPE Introduction The purp
Page 26 and 27: Historical Context The southern chu
Page 28 and 29: Landscape Concept The diagram adjac
Page 30 and 31: Response to Site The ANGULAR framew
Page 32 and 33: Sketch Plan: North Churchyard 3 The
Page 34 and 35: Sketch Ideas Red cliff - continuati
Page 36 and 37: NORTH CHURCHYARD Simple high-qualit
Page 40 and 41: 4.4 SCHEME UPDATES ARCHITECTURAL PR
Page 42 and 43: FFL 12.00 FFL 10.36 FFL 10.36 FFL 1
Page 44 and 45: FFL 12.00 FFL 10.36 FFL 10.36 FFL 1
Page 46 and 47: 4.5 CURRENT PROPOSALS 11 13 3 9 10
Page 48 and 49: 27 29 28 A Concept Image for the Ne
Page 50 and 51: 31 32 The Chancel South Aisle & Pri
Page 52 and 53: 4.6 MATERIALITY The design team hav
Page 54 and 55: PROPOSED OPENING TO NORTH AISLE
Page 56 and 57: Former Opening to South Porch Stair
Page 58 and 59: 4.8 AREAS OF FURTHER INVESTIGATION
Page 60 and 61: 5.0 CONSULTATION In order to ensure
Page 62 and 63: 6.0 COST PLAN Throughout RIBA Stage
Page 64 and 65: 7.0 RISK REGISTER To ensure the eff
Page 66 and 67: SMR - PROJECT 450 - RISK REGISTER R
Page 68 and 69: 8.0 PROGRAMME The below-listed prog
Page 70 and 71: 10.0 APPENDICES Endnotes 1 Sampson,
Page 72 and 73: St Mary Redcliffe Appendix B BS 583
Page 74 and 75: 10.2 ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Contents
Page 76 and 77: 2 Method 2.8 A list of other specie
Page 78 and 79: 3 Results with some parts ancient w
Page 80 and 81: Eurasian Badger Meles meles Mammals
Page 82 and 83: oost is defined as any structure or
Page 84 and 85: Appendix 2 Policy & Legal Considera
Page 86 and 87: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A
Page 88 and 89:
10.3 MEP STRATEGY 4 Site Infrastruc
Page 90 and 91:
5 Proposed infrastructure This opti
Page 92 and 93:
1563.R1 - Stage 2 report Page 12 of
Page 94 and 95:
9 Mechanical Services Strategy 9.1
Page 96 and 97:
In some public areas low surface te
Page 98 and 99:
Drainage is provided to the existin
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Flexible conduits will be used for
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106:
35 HYB ASS'D ROU 1 x 75 35 Hyb AR T
show all

St Mary Redcliffe Project 450 RIBA 2 Stage End Report

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?