St Mary Redcliffe Project 450 RIBA 2 Stage End Report

More documents

Recommendations

Info

8.0 PROGRAMME The below-listed programme represents a projection from the current position, based on anticipated timescales for design development, documentation, and ongoing consultation It records an overall prolongation of 4 months from the initial programme and, as such, is subject to client review and approval Rev B - 16.12.19 ID Task Task Name Duration Start Finish Mode 1 RIBA 1+ 15 days? Mon 01/07/19 Fri 19/07/19 2 Start‐Up Meeting 1 day Mon 01/07/19 Mon 01/07/19 5 Masterplan Review 14 days Tue 02/07/19 Fri 19/07/19 3 Project Board 1 day? Mon 08/07/19 Mon 08/07/19 4 Cost Review 5 days? Mon 15/07/19 Fri 19/07/19 6 RIBA 2 115 days? Mon 22/07/19 Fri 20/12/19 7 On site Review of Proposals 5 days Mon 22/07/19 Fri 26/07/19 8 Scheme Update 15 days Mon 29/07/19 Fri 16/08/19 9 Client Presentation 1 day? Mon 12/08/19 Mon 12/08/19 10 Project Board 1 day? Mon 12/08/19 Mon 12/08/19 14 Wider SMR Update 5 days? Tue 13/08/19 Sun 18/08/19 15 Cost Review 6 days Tue 13/08/19 Mon 19/08/19 11 Intervention Details Survey 3 days Mon 19/08/19 Wed 21/08/19 13 Outline Intervention Details 66 days Thu 22/08/19 Mon 18/11/19 12 DAC Pre‐App Meeting 1 day? Wed 28/08/19 Wed 28/08/19 16 Client Presentation 1 day Mon 11/11/19 Mon 11/11/19 17 Project Board 1 day? Mon 11/11/19 Mon 11/11/19 18 Engagement with DAC 1 day Mon 11/11/19 Mon 11/11/19 19 Scheme Update 17 days Mon 25/11/19 Mon 16/12/19 20 RIBA 3 113 days? Mon 13/01/20 Wed 17/06/20 37 Wider SMR Update 1 day? Mon 10/02/20 Mon 10/02/20 30 Planning / Faculty Scheme Drawings 25 days Mon 13/01/20 Fri 14/02/20 31 First Draft Visuals 15 days Mon 20/01/20 Fri 07/02/20 33 Client Presentation 1 day? Mon 10/02/20 Mon 10/02/20 38 Project Board 1 day? Mon 10/02/20 Mon 10/02/20 32 Wider SMR Update 1 day? Mon 10/02/20 Mon 10/02/20 29 Planning / Faculty Details 15 days Mon 17/02/20 Fri 06/03/20 21 Meeting of PCC 1 day? Mon 24/02/20 Mon 24/02/20 22 Project Board 1 day? Mon 09/03/20 Mon 09/03/20 28 First Draft of Drawings Issued 1 day? Mon 09/03/20 Mon 09/03/20 2020 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 34 Client Review of First Draft 4 days Tue 10/03/20 Fri 13/03/20 35 1:20s / New Details 25 days Mon 16/03/20 Fri 17/04/20 36 Project Board 1 day? Mon 13/04/20 Mon 13/04/20 26 DAS / HIA 30 days? Mon 20/04/20 Fri 29/05/20 27 Project Board 1 day? Mon 11/05/20 Mon 11/05/20 25 Final Draft of Documentation Issued 1 day? Mon 01/06/20 Mon 01/06/20 24 Client Review of Final Draft 5 days Tue 02/06/20 Mon 08/06/20 23 Finalising Documentation 4 days Tue 09/06/20 Fri 12/06/20 39 Planning / Faculty Submissions 1 day? Mon 15/06/20 Mon 15/06/20 Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Project: SMR Date: Mon 16/12/19 Split Milestone Inactive Task Inactive Milestone Duration-only Manual Summary Rollup Finish-only External Tasks Progress Manual Progress Summary Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Page 1
9.0 NEXT STEPS Recording the development of a considered and coordinated concept design, this report and its findings will be presented to the P450 Project Board on 10 Feb 2020. Subject to approval, it is proposed to then progress to RIBA 3 to undertake the detailed design development and preparation of the comprehensive documentation necessary for the Consents applications To de-risk this process, and with due regard to the feedback received from stakeholders, the following next steps are proposed: 5. FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS Finally, prior to all of the above, to provide an opportunity to consult on the outcomes, and avoid potentially abortive work during RIBA 3, the design team will, as a first priority, undertake the options studies cited in Section 4.8 1. FORMAL PRE-APPLICATION ENQUIRY Subject to the approval of both the Canynges Society and the Church Lands Charity, utilise the existing contact with Dr Roger Leech to initiate a bespoke, formal pre-app process to engage both BCC’s planning department and the Conservation Advisory Group and invite written feedback on the current proposals, areas of further development, and any factors affecting Consents / Approval Dan Talkes Consultant Project Architect RIBA AABC 2. PUBLIC & STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION Alongside item 1, continue the pattern of regular, open engagement to ensure continued project support and an increased sense of ownership within P450’s stakeholders, community and congregation 3. ADDITIONAL SURVEYS / INVESTIGATIONS As noted within section 7.0, throughout RIBA 2, the design team has conducted a review of the available survey information. Given the current level of scheme design, targeted investigations of key areas of unresolved risk are now possible, and it is therefore recommended that, at the commencement of RIBA 3, the design team scopes and competitively tenders these surveys to obtain accurate costs for client consideration 4. EXPERIENTIAL WALK-THROUGH The current proposals are undoubtedly complex and many consultees, both stakeholder and public, have expressed difficulty in visualising particularly the proposed internal spaces. For this reason, the design team intend to produce a three-dimensional, digital walk-through model that can be presented either as a video or, ideally, as a self-directed ‘virtual’ experience The existing architectural fee includes an allocation for visualisations, so Purcell will seek specialist advice on what might be achieved for this sum
Page 1 and 2:
ST MARY REDCLIFFE PROJECT 450 RIBA
Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT TEAM 2.0 INTRO
Page 5 and 6:
2.0 INTRODUCTION Funded jointly by
Page 7 and 8:
Project 450 Board Review Instructio
Page 9 and 10:
4.1 STRUCTURES Undertaken by Integr
Page 11 and 12:
s dopted e, whilst A full CCTV surv
Page 13 and 14:
3.2 Existing Trees There are a larg
Page 15 and 16:
Stability can be provided by reinfo
Page 17 and 18: 1563.R1 - Stage 2 report Page 5 of
Page 19 and 20: LEGEND 40-60 W/m 2 HEAT GAINS - NAT
Page 21 and 22: LEGEND 40-60 W/m 2 HEAT GAINS - NAT
Page 24 and 25: 4.3 LANDSCAPE Introduction The purp
Page 26 and 27: Historical Context The southern chu
Page 28 and 29: Landscape Concept The diagram adjac
Page 30 and 31: Response to Site The ANGULAR framew
Page 32 and 33: Sketch Plan: North Churchyard 3 The
Page 34 and 35: Sketch Ideas Red cliff - continuati
Page 36 and 37: NORTH CHURCHYARD Simple high-qualit
Page 38 and 39: SOUTH CHURCHYARD Mown paths/ margin
Page 40 and 41: 4.4 SCHEME UPDATES ARCHITECTURAL PR
Page 42 and 43: FFL 12.00 FFL 10.36 FFL 10.36 FFL 1
Page 44 and 45: FFL 12.00 FFL 10.36 FFL 10.36 FFL 1
Page 46 and 47: 4.5 CURRENT PROPOSALS 11 13 3 9 10
Page 48 and 49: 27 29 28 A Concept Image for the Ne
Page 50 and 51: 31 32 The Chancel South Aisle & Pri
Page 52 and 53: 4.6 MATERIALITY The design team hav
Page 54 and 55: PROPOSED OPENING TO NORTH AISLE
Page 56 and 57: Former Opening to South Porch Stair
Page 58 and 59: 4.8 AREAS OF FURTHER INVESTIGATION
Page 60 and 61: 5.0 CONSULTATION In order to ensure
Page 62 and 63: 6.0 COST PLAN Throughout RIBA Stage
Page 64 and 65: 7.0 RISK REGISTER To ensure the eff
Page 66 and 67: SMR - PROJECT 450 - RISK REGISTER R
Page 70 and 71: 10.0 APPENDICES Endnotes 1 Sampson,
Page 72 and 73: St Mary Redcliffe Appendix B BS 583
Page 74 and 75: 10.2 ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Contents
Page 76 and 77: 2 Method 2.8 A list of other specie
Page 78 and 79: 3 Results with some parts ancient w
Page 80 and 81: Eurasian Badger Meles meles Mammals
Page 82 and 83: oost is defined as any structure or
Page 84 and 85: Appendix 2 Policy & Legal Considera
Page 86 and 87: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A
Page 88 and 89: 10.3 MEP STRATEGY 4 Site Infrastruc
Page 90 and 91: 5 Proposed infrastructure This opti
Page 94 and 95: 9 Mechanical Services Strategy 9.1
Page 96 and 97: In some public areas low surface te
Page 98 and 99: Drainage is provided to the existin
Page 102 and 103: Flexible conduits will be used for
Page 106: 35 HYB ASS'D ROU 1 x 75 35 Hyb AR T
show all

St Mary Redcliffe Project 450 RIBA 2 Stage End Report

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?