20.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - October 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - October 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - October 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

|9/19/03 06:19:15<br />

PM|Roadscholarette|Chicago||roadscholarette@hotmail.com||||7|Kent -Early<br />

Tyson was a caveman, but a fast, savage, hard hitting caveman. Possibly only Ali<br />

and Frazier put combinations together as fast, and it'd be close. Prime to<br />

prime, I think Tyson would take <strong>Jerry</strong>, possibly Ali, Frazier, only if he struck<br />

early (past five, and Joe'd chop him up), but Foreman would lift him off the<br />

canvas - another Kingston. Late Tyson, all of the guys would beat him fairly<br />

easily, inside the distance.|<br />

|9/19/03 06:25:08<br />

PM|Roadscholarette|Chicago||roadscholarette@hotmail.com||||10|BTW, has anyone<br />

given any thought to Tyson being heavily onto steroids? His weight for his<br />

height (and I don't think he's really 5'11"), and as chiseled as he is - giant<br />

arms, neck, six pack stomach - are all sure signs of steroids. I haven't been<br />

able to see closely enough to tell if he has stretch marks (harder to see on a<br />

black man), but the most common and obvious place would be in the<br />

underarm/pectoral region. If he were on them, this would enhance his speed and<br />

strength immensely. Boxing being what it is, someone could be from another<br />

planet and on LSD, and no one would know or care.|<br />

|9/19/03 07:12:21 PM|kookoo|ny||kookooclock000@yahoo.com||||7|i would not doubt<br />

mike tyson being on drugs. theres no telling with him. i don't like him as a<br />

person and he says a lot of stupid things. he did say somthing very smart once.<br />

HE SAID PEOPLE ARE OUT FOR WHAT THEY CAN GET FROM HIM. ALSO HE JUDGES PEOPLE NOT<br />

FOR WHO THEY ARE, BUT FOR WHO THEY REALLY ARE!!! the clockster agrees coo coo|<br />

|9/19/03 07:57:26 PM|Kent|So Cal||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Koo Koo you said<br />

Frazier, Ellis, <strong>Jerry</strong>, would have no chance agaisnt today's heavyweights? Two<br />

of the three major heavyweight titles in this so called age of giant<br />

heavyweights are held by Roy Jones Jr. 193 pounds when he won his title and<br />

normally a light heavyweight, and Chris Byrd who weighs about 213 pounds. If<br />

these two can win titles in today's age, then why not the fighters from the 60s<br />

and 70s?In recent times only two larger heavyweights have shown to be<br />

major talents, Lennox Lewis and Riddick Bowe. Otherwise the champions have been<br />

closer to the size of the fighters from <strong>Jerry</strong>'s and Joe F's era. Among them,<br />

Tyson, 220 pounds in his prime, Evander Holyfield, 205 to 212 in his prime and<br />

Larry Holmes, 212 to 215 in his prime.When some of the other super sized<br />

heavyweights start winning major titles and holding on to them, then we can say<br />

this is the age of the super big heavyweights. Only David Tua, who is hot one<br />

minute and then cold the next and the Klitscko Brothers have shown any kind of<br />

talent at all and the K Brothers still need to prove themselves as being<br />

anything more than talented prospects. None of the other so called<br />

giant fighters of today have proved they have any talent at all. Frazier, <strong>Jerry</strong>,<br />

Patterson, and especially Foreman and Ali would do very well against these<br />

lumbering, limited fighters. |<br />

|9/19/03 10:02:06 PM|kookoo|ny||kookooclock000@yahoo.com||||7|kent , you poor<br />

lost soul. don't understand that runners are faster, football players are bigger<br />

and better. the boxers are lagging behind on talent(i'll give you that)<br />

otherwise , no contestthe small guys lose. roy jones jr. is an exception to<br />

the rule. he might be the greatest fight in history before he gets done. KENT,<br />

STOP LIVING IN THE PAST ANOTHER THING PAUL DOES. IT'S NOT 1968, IT'S 2003 PAUL<br />

RESPOND TO MY EMAILS I LIKE TO TALK ABOUT KENT , I WROTE THE BOOK YOU KNOW:) COO<br />

COO |<br />

|9/19/03 10:30:44 PM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Yes Koo Koo,<br />

you are right, athletes in other sports are bigger, stronger, and faster. But<br />

boxing is a sport that requires a specialized skill and skill beats size most of<br />

the time. My examples of champions from recent times shows that except for a<br />

few occasions, the heavyweight champions have not been that much bigger than<br />

they were in the past, maybe twenty pounds or so at the most.Like I<br />

said, when more of the super sized heayweights start dominating the division,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!