20.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - October 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - October 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - October 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

paul all live in the past. go to a poetry site, something you seem to know<br />

about. cooooo cooooo !!!!|<br />

|9/22/03 03:50:53 PM|Massimo|Rome||t||||10|To everybody-I need an<br />

advice. I have decided to buy Ali'-Terrell from Lotis Tunaman. Is it a good idea<br />

? I mean, was it a good fight ? Thanks !In particular to Kookoo-How do<br />

you explain, as a great Tyson's fan, his lost against Buster Douglas ? Just a<br />

bad night ?|<br />

|9/22/03 04:33:46 PM|kookoo|ny||kookooclock000@yahoo.com||||8|massimo, do you<br />

really think that douglas would have won a rematch??? tyson himself knew that he<br />

could win back the title. anytime he wanted. i'm am not a tyson fan, i am a<br />

great quarry fan, better than kent and paul. the quarry family has great respect<br />

for my opinion. sonya email me a couple of years ago to thank me. i know my<br />

stuff,i just heard my alarm. coo coo coo coo |<br />

|9/22/03 04:41:01 PM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Kook:<br />

Massimo's English is probably better than your Italian! And if living in the<br />

past includes, Ali, Foreman, Frazier, Norton, Shavers, <strong>Quarry</strong>, Lyle, Young,<br />

etc., etc., etc., than I'll take the past because these guys would walkover any<br />

of today's heavyweights---simply put, they had the passion and guts that MOST of<br />

today's guys are sorely lacking. Also, I find it odd that people ridicule<br />

Cooney for the competition he dominated on his way up, while nobody comments<br />

that Tyson fought the same type of opponents during his climb. Was Marvis<br />

Frazier any more of a threat than Lyle or Young? Was a retired Larry Holmes<br />

that much better than a semi-retired Ken Norton? I'm really defending Cooney<br />

more than putting down Tyson, who was potentially the best ever. But he didn't<br />

follow through on his greatness---and it wasn't the loss to Douglas---it was the<br />

fact that he never recovered from that loss to achieve greatness again. |<br />

|9/22/03 05:18:48 PM|Steve|N.J.||dmmsrm@comcast.net||||10|Will someone explain<br />

the seemingly simple ten point must system to me?<strong>The</strong>se last two weeks have<br />

produced decisions in two big fights that make me question my<br />

understanding.winner of a round who scores a knockdown,gets a 10-8 round.Winner<br />

of a round must get 10 points.Usually a 10-9 round.In a 12 rnd.fight,if you<br />

score a perfect shutout,you get 120pnts.I cannot remember ever seeing a 9-8<br />

round.How could Byrd have possibly won by a 111-117 margin on that one judges<br />

card? How many rounds does that mean he won? <strong>The</strong>se Vegas judges are just<br />

knocking the enjoyment right out of this sport for me.What's worse, there doing<br />

it on cable tv for all the world to see.Amagine what the casual boxing fan,who<br />

only watches big fights on HBO or pay-per-view ,must think!!! |<br />

|9/22/03 05:34:30 PM|Steve|N.J.||dmmsrm@comcast.net||||10|After watching the<br />

DeLaHoya-Moseley fight a second time, I think possibly it could have been a just<br />

decision.It depends on several factors.Do the judges give more credit for total<br />

percentages of power punches and jabs landed? Perhaps they evaluate on the<br />

effectiveness of punches landed,who does the most damage. Moseley's punches<br />

though fewer than Oscar's, seemed to be heavier and do more damage.At the end of<br />

the fight,it seemed like Oscar had gotten beaten up.|<br />

|9/22/03 05:40:24 PM|Massimo|Rome||g||||10|KooKoo-Very probably he<br />

wouldn't have won the rematch even if Douglas never was in that shape again.<br />

This doesn't explain what really happened in that night. Tyson was young<br />

andat the peak of his career, maybe a little overweight, but just a little.<br />

<strong>The</strong> thing that mostly surprised me was that Mike lost badly the ninth round,<br />

after having obtained a knockdown in the eight ! I 'd like to know if the reach<br />

of a fighter is measured with open hands or with closed fists. Thanks ! |<br />

|9/22/03 05:52:41 PM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Tysons aura<br />

of invincibility was shattered by Douglas---but even so, I've got to believe<br />

Tyson would have won a rematch. I think Tyson was in decent physical shape for<br />

the fight, but wasn't focused mentally. In contrast, Buster Douglas was totally<br />

focused and stuck with his fight plan in an amazing way. Not since Young-<br />

Foreman did any underdog go in with a plan and stick with it to that extent.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!