20.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - October 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - October 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - October 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

it gets and do not take his losses to Muhammad Ali that seriously. Joe would<br />

get dropped early and become more mobile and come back to win the late rounds<br />

with accurate counter-punching. <strong>The</strong> fight ends in a draw and I will have to<br />

think before the rematch is fought about who will get the nod.|<br />

|8/14/02 12:17:28 AM|Jeff|USA||jps65@sacbeemail.com||||10|ESPN Classic is a<br />

great place to watch some of the great old fights. But watching all the old<br />

fights leads you back to the same old conclusion. Muhammad Ali was the greatest<br />

fighter of all time. Those quick hands still amaze me. He gets off 5 punches<br />

to your 1, who can compete with that?|<br />

|8/14/02 03:29:02 PM|Steve|N.J.||dmmsrm@comcast.net||||10|Louis vs Liston would<br />

have been a great fight.Someone on this site recently stated that "the<br />

difference between Frazier and Tyson was that Frazier had more heart".Tyson has<br />

been accused of having a bully's mentality,and so has Liston.I do think that<br />

both fighters relied heavily on intimidating their opponents.I do not believe<br />

Liston ever faced anyone even close to the physical skill level of Joe<br />

Louis.Liston was a great fighter and probably belongs in the top 20<br />

heavywieghts.That said,I still think Louis was quicker, a better combination<br />

puncher,tougher,and may have hit just as hard as Liston.I pick Joe L ouis by tko<br />

in eleven or twelve rounds.|<br />

|8/14/02 04:01:08 PM|Steve|N.J.||dmmsrm@comcast.net||||10|In my last post I<br />

forgot to factor in Sonny Liston's very long armed,accurate and powerful<br />

jab.This would not have changed the outcome of the fight but would have made it<br />

even more exciting.A question for everyone's analysis,who had the most effective<br />

jab of all era's? Effective meaning it played a large part in the fighter's<br />

victory. In terms of speed,accuracy,and power,and ability to cause damage,cuts,<br />

swelling, ect.|<br />

|8/14/02 04:13:54 PM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||oriononside@aol.com||||10|Just watched<br />

on ESPN Classic <strong>Jerry</strong> verses Norton and <strong>Jerry</strong> verses Frazier 2. We have<br />

recently discussed that <strong>Jerry</strong> was on the way down when he fought Norton and was<br />

not in his best condition but still gave Norton a good fight, in the first three<br />

rounds at least. In Frazier/<strong>Quarry</strong> 2, <strong>Jerry</strong> boxed very well in the first round<br />

but seemed to abandon a good plan of moving and counter punching after that. It<br />

made for some great action of <strong>Jerry</strong> and Frazier going toe to toe, it became a<br />

war, but Frazier was in complete control by round four on the way to a fifth<br />

round TKO win. Did <strong>Jerry</strong> go away from his plan of boxing instead of slugging<br />

because as the announcer said, Frazier would not let him move or was it because<br />

<strong>Jerry</strong> was stubborn and chose to slug it out with Frazier? I think it may have<br />

been a combination of both.|<br />

|8/14/02 07:51:04 PM|Gerry Schultz|Ohio||jgschultz@firstam.com||||9|I just<br />

recently watched Joe Frazier vs. Ron Stander on ESPN, after two rounds it was<br />

tough to watch. I give Joe a lot of credit for the way he trained, his courage<br />

and attitude as a fighter, and how well grounded he was/is out of the ring.<br />

During their day, I cheered for both he and <strong>Jerry</strong> about equally because he came<br />

across well as a good guy and an overacheiver. But I do not see him beating<br />

Tyson, a harder, quicker puncher who could do Joe like Foreman did. Joe would be<br />

tougher and more skilled, but also easier to hit. While I prefer Joe, I have to<br />

be honest... As for Liston/Louis, I do feel Joe was the fighter of the century<br />

because of the way he conducted himself, that he united people in a tumultuous<br />

era, and he stood for the country even when it did not for him. Again, I have to<br />

pick the villain, Liston , though. Joe, from the waist down, was like most<br />

fighters of his era, not mobile, but was a punching machine from the waist up.<br />

Liston was bigger, stronger, very intimidating and just as methodical, plus he<br />

had that ridiculous jab, which required a movemnet fighter, an Ali, to avoid.<br />

<strong>The</strong> good guys lose both of these, in my opinion. Great fantasy bouts, though. |<br />

|8/14/02 08:05:15 PM|Gerry Schultz|Ohio||jgschultz@firstam.com||||10|Also, to<br />

answer Kent and Steve, I feel <strong>Jerry</strong> had two real flaws in an otherwise<br />

outstanding package, 1) low hands 2) an instinct to brawl that squashed good

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!