20.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - October 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - October 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - October 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

! Cristoforo Colombo should be your number 1 hero...Shaq should be just the<br />

number 2 !|<br />

|10/16/03 02:37:15 AM|Hubie Albrecht|San Jose, CA||halbrecht@aol.com<br />

||||9|Here's what you have to believe to conclude that Mike Tyson would have<br />

beaten Joe Louis: 1) Tyson with his mediocre defense would have<br />

withstood Louis's powerful and proven punching power.2) Tyson, who fought<br />

mostly run of the mill opponents, is simply better somehow than Louis, who also<br />

fought mostly run of the mill opponents. 3) <strong>The</strong> reputedly superior<br />

equipment, training methods, conditioning and nutrition of Tyson would enable<br />

him somehow to dominate and defeat Louis with his inferior stuff. 4) Tyson's<br />

so-called ferocity would intimidate and overcome Louis. 5) Tyson at 5'10"<br />

and 220 would physically dominate and overpower Louis at 6'1" and 205. 6)<br />

Tyson's pattern of rushing out to try for a first round KO being his choice,<br />

unlike any other prominent boxer in recent history, would also prevail over Joe<br />

Louis in a first round KO, even though Louis never in his career lost a fight in<br />

the first round. 7) Evander Holyfield figured out Tyson and owned him, but<br />

Joe Louis could and would not. In my opinion, not a single one of these<br />

beliefs is supportable. While they are both great champions, I believe Louis<br />

would have won a single fight, or about 8 out 10 if they fought that often. He<br />

was fast, shrewd, a superb boxer, and packed a wallop with either hand. Sooner<br />

or later, he figured out almost everybody, and then knocked each one out. He<br />

would have been a great champion at the turn of the century or in 2003, when he<br />

would have easily trained up to 220 or more. In his day, when boxers fought<br />

every other week usually, skill and speed were considered more important than<br />

size. Louis would have had a good chance against any champion, before or after<br />

him, including Ali, Foreman, Frazier, Dempsey or Marciano. He might have lost or<br />

won, but he would have been in every fight. He was a great champion, fought all<br />

contenders, and I don't understand why anyone would sincerely argue otherwise. |<br />

|10/16/03 03:26:20 AM|Ed|Cicero N Y||mooseygoop@aol.com||||10|Tyson had 3 phases<br />

to his career. Phase 1, when he was focused on boxing and with trainer Kevin<br />

Rooney he was a great fighter. His combination of power and hand speed we're<br />

unmatched, (Ali and Patterson maybe matched his hand speed but not his power.<br />

Liston and Foreman his power but not his speed). He had excellent head movement<br />

and a very good chin. His fighting discipline was also more focused. He lived to<br />

fight.Phase 2, after Kevin Rooney, was the start of his downfall. Blame it<br />

on a bad marriage, extremely poor trainers who couldn't handle Mike ( I'll never<br />

forget the way his trainers handled the ice bag when Tyson fought Douglas), Don<br />

King's antics causing resentment with Mike, or Mikes over active sex<br />

drive..these things all contributed to his fall from greatness. Mike was always<br />

a loose cannon and needed strong people around him to keep him in line. He<br />

didn't have it.<strong>The</strong> third phase was his after prison life. He came out of<br />

jail very resentful and unfocused in boxing. He never would have bitten<br />

Holyfield's ear early on in his career. He pulled one bad stunt after another<br />

but he was making huge money and still knocking out most guys very quickly. Even<br />

today at this stage theres still very few fighters that could beat him ( but<br />

with the current state of the heavyweight division thats not saying very much).<br />

So when I judge Mike Tyson I use the first phase of his career. He would<br />

have beaten most ex-champs easily and would have had an excellent chance against<br />

anyone in history.|<br />

|10/16/03 03:53:33 AM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||Kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Massimo,<br />

these questions were for your amusmement (and mine too). You are wrong!!!<br />

Columbus did not discover the Americas!!! <strong>The</strong> ancestors of the present day<br />

Native Americans, also known as Indians because Columbus claimed he was in<br />

India, came to the Americas and settled here thousands of years before any<br />

Europeans ever set foot here. It is believed that the Bering Strait,which<br />

seperates Alaska in the United States and Siberia in Russia, was a land mass and<br />

the people originally came from Asia. <strong>The</strong>y slowly settled the continents of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!